RT Erdogan, an ardent supporter of Palestinian interests, urged restraint on both sides in the early days of the war.
But after the explosion at Ahli Arab Hospital in the Gaza Strip last week, which sparked protests in Muslim countries, RT Erdogan changed his tone.
“The international community is not taking any measures against the Israeli regime’s illegal and unrestrained attacks on civilians,” RT Erdogan said in a statement marking the 78th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations.
“We observe that the United Nations Security Council, instead of stopping the bloodshed, ensuring a ceasefire as soon as possible and taking steps to prevent civilian casualties, has deepened the crisis with its unilateral approach,” he added.
On October 7, the Islamist group “Hamas” invaded Israel from the Gaza Strip, killing at least 1.4 thousand people. people, mostly civilians, and took more than 220 hostages.
In response to the attack, the Jewish state launched a bombing campaign in the Gaza Strip, where entire city blocks were razed to the ground. Almost 5.8 thousand died there. people, says the Hamas-controlled territory’s health ministry.
RT Erdogan’s comments came moments after he spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin, whose country is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, along with the United Kingdom, China, France and the United States.
RT Erdogan said the Security Council “can only monitor the collective punishment of the people of Gaza” and accused it of paralyzing the work of the UN agency responsible for helping Palestinian refugees.
“However, we continue to strongly support and defend the values that the United Nations stands for and the principle of multilateralism that underpins the rules-based global system,” he added.
#Erdogan #Security #Council #deepened #crisis #Gaza #Strip
Interview with Dr. Leyla Akdemir, Expert on Middle Eastern Politics
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Akdemir. Following recent events in Gaza and President Erdogan’s statements, how do you assess his shift in tone towards the Israel-Palestine conflict?
Dr. Akdemir: Thank you for having me. President Erdogan’s change in rhetoric is significant. Initially, he called for restraint from both parties, but following the tragic incident at the Ahli Arab Hospital, he adopted a more accusatory stance. This shift reflects the heightened emotions in the region and Erdogan’s position as a leader who has historically championed Palestinian rights.
Editor: Erdogan mentioned that the international community is not taking appropriate measures against Israel’s actions. How does this viewpoint align with the reactions of other leaders and organizations?
Dr. Akdemir: Indeed, Erdogan’s comments resonate with the sentiments expressed by various leaders in Muslim-majority countries. Many have criticized perceived inaction from the international community, particularly the United Nations. The emphasis on the UN Security Council’s failure to act effectively highlights a broader frustration among nations that feel marginalized in diplomatic discussions about the conflict.
Editor: You mentioned historical support for Palestine from Erdogan. How could this incident impact Turkey’s diplomatic relations in the region?
Dr. Akdemir: Erdogan’s vocal support for Palestine may bolster his standing within the Arab world, strengthening Turkey’s role as a regional leader. However, it could also complicate relationships with Western nations that support Israel. The balance will be difficult to maintain, especially given the historical context of Turkey’s foreign policy in the region.
Editor: what steps do you believe the international community should take in light of Erdogan’s concerns?
Dr. Akdemir: The international community must prioritize immediate humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza and work towards a meaningful ceasefire. Engaging in diplomatic dialogue that includes all stakeholders—both Palestinian and Israeli representatives—is crucial. Additionally, the UN needs reform and perhaps a more active role in conflict resolution to ensure that such tragedies are prevented in the future.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Akdemir, for your insights on this critical topic. We appreciate your time.
To intervene effectively highlights a growing frustration among countries affected by the conflict. This frustration is compounded by the significant civilian casualties in Gaza and the perceived bias in how the crisis is being handled. Erdogan’s statements reflect not only his personal convictions but also a broader regional sentiment that demands accountability and action.
Editor: You mentioned Erdogan’s historical advocacy for Palestinian rights. How do you think this affects Turkey’s foreign relations, particularly with Israel and Western nations?
Dr. Akdemir: Erdogan’s strong pro-Palestinian stance definitely complicates Turkey’s relationship with Israel and poses challenges for its geopolitical ties with Western nations. While Turkey has attempted to maintain diplomatic channels with Israel, his rhetoric during crises like this can strain those relationships. However, Erdogan also navigates a delicate balance; maintaining a strong identity as a supporter of Muslim causes resonates well with his domestic audience and strengthens his position regionally. Ultimately, these dynamics reflect the complexities of Middle Eastern politics where national interests often conflict with ideological stances.
Editor: Lastly, what implications do you foresee from Erdogan’s recent comments on the future of the Israel-Palestine conflict and international diplomacy?
Dr. Akdemir: Erdogan’s comments could pave the way for increased support for Palestinian initiatives, potentially energizing diplomacy aimed at addressing Palestinian rights. However, his criticisms of the Security Council may also lead to further polarization in the already contentious international climate surrounding the conflict. The call for multilateralism that he champions suggests a desire for broader dialogue, yet it remains to be seen whether that will translate into effective solutions on the ground. What is crucial now is whether world leaders will heed these calls and work toward a more balanced approach that prioritizes humanitarian concerns.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Akdemir, for your insights on this critical issue.
Dr. Akdemir: Thank you for having me. It’s a complex time, and continued dialogue is essential.
