2024-09-19 01:02:00
Amid activist tensions, UC Riverside House of Commons leader, Rodrigo de LoredoTalked about the decision to expel from the EU those lawmakers who aligned themselves with the government over the president’s veto of retirement reforms. In this regard, he clarified in a conversation with PERFIL that While “they didn’t kick anyone out,” “they didn’t beg them to stay, either.”.
cordoba foal Try putting a cold cloth insideclarifying that the “atomization of political representation” is a product of “the current complex moment” and “happens in all neighborhoods,” so the UCR is “no exception.” His statement came after a group meeting held after the Radical Party Congress decided to suspend the affiliations of the four state representatives who voted in favor of rejecting the Temporary Mobility Act: Mariano Campello, Martin Achoor, Pablo Cervi y Louis Picart.
Radical bloc in House acknowledges split, but sweetheart lawmakers remain inside
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Continuing with this premise, he emphasizes Radicalism ‘is the group that loses the fewest members’ Since Javier Mire became president. “We continue to integrate the group with 33 representatives,” he stressed, insisting that this was “the group that implemented the most reform initiatives, because we were the country that enacted the most changes to the Basic Law and ultimately adopted them. “ . “We were the originators of the labor reforms that eventually became law (with logical changes) and brought the necessary reforms to Argentines, and we were the originators of the restrictions on pensions and the ‘quality adjustment’ of pensions. University financing initiatives,” he added.
Regarding changes in delegates voting to uphold a presidential veto, he said, “Like every other group, we are not exempt from a group of delegates who vote differently than the majority.” Along these lines, he argued that cases of activism “tend to be more Loud” because their number of seats “because they are majority-centric, often ultimately determines whether a law is passed”. “Close down to business, insistence on the pension vote resulted in a 28-vote change in favor of the government, but clearly, The axis is drawn on the 5 votes corresponding to Radicalism“, hold on.
In this way, he accused the Assembly Council of being unjustified in its decision to suspend the affiliation of Campero, Arjol, Cervi and Picat. “Selective and one-sided”. “There are dozens of other cases of leaders competing with the UCR but not being sanctioned,” he said. Furthermore, he explained that it was decided “by an overwhelming majority” not to accept the above-mentioned resolution or the “minority’s” request to expel them.
Along these lines, he added, the Convention Bureau’s measures “This is arbitrary and illegal” Because it does not guarantee the legislator’s “right to defense.” “The delegates were not notified to make their arguments; our group was not notified. I do not agree with the position taken by the delegates, but I am fully aware that they are honorable delegates with a reputation and a long track record in their areas, “he said.
“We’re not going to kick anyone off the block out of a sense of responsibility, but We won’t beg anyone to stay either.”, he initiated. Likewise, he suggested that “those who are uncomfortable with the positions taken by the activist group majority and the democrats can do whatever they want.
Picart: “I don’t rule out that the radical group will split, some people will leave, and today two extreme visions coexist”
He also spoke of rifts within the party, which he described as “Minority identification with political representation [Martín] Lusteau and [Facundo] Maneswho have an extreme opposition profile to the government and mainly represent AMBA and the city of Buenos Aires”, while on the other hand “most of the activists from the interior have a more cooperative view with the government and understand the need for fiscal balance nature to stabilize the economy and govern the provinces and many municipalities; despite marking institutional variables as the main difference from the government.
Along these lines, he issued a warning to those who “publicly express” their “disagreement” because “You have to tremble and put your ego aside”. Instead, he invited them to “do their laundry at home.” However, he noted, “There are clearly sectors that will destructively seek to position themselves based on internal divisions, causing widespread damage to party representation.”
At the same time, he confirmed that future decisions “will be made by the majority” A few people must accompany or explain “I do not want to be distracted by these issues, but rather focus on the current and future legislative agenda,” he concluded.
With information provided by Giselle Leclercq
MB/Ji
1726709278
#Rodrigo #Loredo #dismantling #radical #groups #wont #kick #wont #beg #stay
What did Rodrigo de Loredo say about the expulsion of lawmakers from the UCR?
Table of Contents
Here is a comprehensive and SEO-optimized article based on the provided text:
UCR Leader Rodrigo de Loredo Speaks Out on Expulsion of Lawmakers Who Voted with Government
Amidst rising tensions, Rodrigo de Loredo, the leader of the House of Commons from UC Riverside (UCR), has spoken out about the decision to expel lawmakers who voted with the government over the president’s veto of retirement reforms. In an exclusive conversation with Perfil, de Loredo clarified that while they didn’t “kick anyone out,” they also “didn’t beg them to stay, either.”
The UCR leader’s statement comes after a group meeting was held following the Radical Party Congress’s decision to suspend the affiliations of four state representatives who voted in favor of rejecting the Temporary Mobility Act. These representatives include Mariano Campello, Martin Achoor, Pablo Cervi, and Louis Picart.
De Loredo emphasized that the “atomization of political representation” is a product of the current complex moment and happens in all neighborhoods, making the UCR no exception. He also highlighted that Radicalism “is the group that loses the fewest members” since Javier Mire became president, with the group continuing to integrate 33 representatives.
Regarding changes in delegate voting to uphold a presidential veto, de Loredo stated that like every other group, they are not exempt from having delegates who vote differently than the majority. He argued that cases of activism “tend to be more loud” because their number of seats “often ultimately determines whether a law is passed.”
De Loredo accused the Assembly Council of being unjustified in its decision to suspend the affiliation of Campero, Arjol, Cervi, and Picat, calling it “selective and one-sided.” He explained that there are dozens of other cases of leaders competing with the UCR but not being sanctioned.
The UCR leader also stated that the Convention Bureau’s measures are “arbitrary and illegal” because they do not guarantee the legislator’s “right to defense.” He added that the delegates were not notified to make their arguments, and the group was not notified.
De Loredo emphasized that the UCR will not “beg anyone to stay” but also won’t “kick anyone out” out of a sense of responsibility. He suggested that those who are uncomfortable with the positions taken by the activist group majority and the democrats can do whatever they want.
Regarding rifts within the party, de Loredo described them as “minority identification with political representation” and stated that some representatives have an extreme opposition profile to the government, mainly representing AMBA and the city of Buenos Aires. He warned those who “publicly express” their ”disagreement” to “tremble and put their ego aside” and instead invited them to “do their laundry at home.”
This article provides an in-depth look at the current political climate in Argentina, highlighting the tensions between the government and opposition parties. The use of SEO-optimized keywords such as “Rodrigo de Loredo,” “UCR,” “House of Commons,” ”Radical Party Congress,” and “Temporary Mobility Act” will help improve the article’s search engine ranking.
– What did Rodrigo de Loredo say about the expulsion of lawmakers in relation to activist tensions?
Here is a rewritten and SEO-optimized article based on the provided content:
UC Riverside Leader Rodrigo de Loredo Speaks Out on Expulsion of Lawmakers Amid Activist Tensions
Amidst rising tensions between activists and lawmakers, Rodrigo de Loredo, the House of Commons leader from UC Riverside, has spoken out on the decision to expel certain lawmakers who sided with the government over the president’s veto of retirement reforms.
In a conversation with PERFIL, de Loredo clarified that while lawmakers weren’t forcibly removed, they weren’t begged to stay either. He stated that the “atomization of political representation” is a product of the current complex moment and affects all neighborhoods, making the UCR no exception.
The Fallout of the Retirement Reforms
The controversy began when the Radical Party Congress decided to suspend the affiliations of four state representatives who voted in favor of rejecting the Temporary Mobility Act. The affected lawmakers are Mariano Campello, Martin Achoor, Pablo Cervi, and Louis Picart.
De Loredo emphasized that Radicalism is the group that has lost the fewest members since Javier Mire became president. He highlighted that the group continues to integrate with 33 representatives and has implemented the most reform initiatives.
The Presidential Veto and Delegate Voting
Regarding changes in delegates voting to uphold a presidential veto, de Loredo stated that, like every other group, they are not exempt from having delegates who vote differently than the majority. He argued that cases of activism tend to be more loud due to their larger number of seats, which often determines whether a law is passed.
De Loredo accused the Assembly Council’s decision to suspend the affiliation of the four lawmakers as “selective and one-sided.” He pointed out that there are dozens of other cases of leaders competing with the UCR but not being sanctioned.
The Right to Defense
De Loredo deemed the Convention Bureau’s measures as “arbitrary and illegal” because they do not guarantee the legislator’s right to defense. He stated that the delegates were not notified to make their arguments, and their group was not notified either.
Conclusion
de Loredo reiterated that they won’t expel anyone from the block out of a sense of responsibility, but they won’t beg them to stay either. He suggested that those who are uncomfortable with the positions taken by the activist group majority and the democrats can do whatever they want.
This article has been optimized for SEO with the following keywords and phrases:
Rodrigo de Loredo
UC Riverside
Radical Party Congress
Temporary Mobility Act
Presidential veto
Delegate voting
Activism
Political representation
* Retirement reforms
Note: I’ve rewritten the article to make it more readable and concise, while maintaining the original content and message. I’ve also added subheadings to improve the article’s structure and readability.
