Screenshot via Joe Rogan Experience; Screenshot via The Charlie Kirk Show
A recent report from The Washington Post highlights a concerning narrative that has gained traction among right-wing podcasts: the notion of future election fraud. This narrative revolves around unsubstantiated claims rather than verified instances of fraud.
In an article released on Thursday, investigative journalists Cat Zakrzewski, Naomi Nix, and Jeremy B. Merrill meticulously analyzed transcripts from over 100 widely listened-to podcasts produced within the last year. They discovered that 26 “nationally prominent programs” — including influential shows such as The Joe Rogan Experience, The Ben Shapiro Show, The Charlie Kirk Show, and The Dan Bongino Show — have devoted considerable segments to propagate unfounded assertions that the 2024 election is set to be compromised:
Some of the hosts or their guests have echoed Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump’s alarming allegations that Democrats are scheming to hijack the election process. Experts warn that these groundless claims could set the stage for listeners to reject any outcome unfavorable to Trump in the tightly contested race. During his appearances in October on the Shapiro and Rogan shows, Trump claimed Democrats were cheating and accused the media of manipulating the electoral process.
On Wednesday, former President Trump made a baseless accusation on Truth Social, asserting that Pennsylvania was already “cheating.” This was part of a series of unsubstantiated claims suggesting the 2024 election would not be valid. The Washington Post underscored that podcasts operate largely without oversight, creating a “safe space” for disseminating misinformation to vast audiences free from the scrutiny of fact-checkers:
Podcasts, whose rapid audio format poses challenges for tech companies and media researchers, create “a safe space” for proponents of election-fraud theories, said Valerie Wirtschafter, a fellow at the Brookings Institution. The intimate relationship that hosts cultivate with their audiences makes these shows particularly effective vehicles for spreading falsehoods and conspiracy theories, as listeners often engage with them during commutes or while performing household tasks, she added.
Four years ago, Trump associates such as Stephen K. Bannon and Rudy Giuliani leveraged podcasts to circulate claims of fraud ahead of the January 6, 2021, assault on the U.S. Capitol. Wirtschafter expressed concerns that similar narratives could emerge once more through these platforms.
“These aren’t fringe voices at the end of the day anymore,” she emphasized. “It’s a really prominent medium that should not be allowed to escape this conversation the way it did in 2020. The microphone is bigger, the audience is larger and the trust is even deeper.”
Have a tip for us? [email protected]
**Interview with Media Analyst, Dr. Emily Roberts**
*Interviewer*: Good afternoon, Dr. Roberts. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent report from *The Washington Post* regarding the rising narrative of election fraud in right-wing podcasts.
*Dr. Roberts*: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical topic that demands attention.
*Interviewer*: The report highlights that over 100 podcasts, including high-profile shows like *The Joe Rogan Experience* and *The Ben Shapiro Show*, have been spreading unverified claims about election fraud. Why do you think these narratives are gaining traction?
*Dr. Roberts*: There are a couple of factors at play here. First, there’s a significant audience for these podcasts; they often cater to listeners who already lean conservative. When a popular host shares an alarming narrative, their followers are more likely to accept it without questioning it. Moreover, these claims tap into existing fears regarding electoral integrity, particularly within segments of the Republican Party.
*Interviewer*: In the report, experts suggest that this could lead to a dangerous precedent where listeners might dismiss any unfavorable election outcomes. Could you elaborate on why this is particularly concerning?
*Dr. Roberts*: Absolutely. This narrative could undermine public trust in the electoral process. If a sizable portion of the electorate believes that the election is rigged or stolen, it could lead to widespread rejection of election outcomes, increased polarization, and even unrest. This cycle of misinformation can create a self-fulfilling prophecy, where the belief in a flawed process can lead to actions and policies that further deteriorate public confidence.
*Interviewer*: The report mentions that some hosts echo Donald Trump’s claims about a Democratic “scheme.” In your view, how does the involvement of high-profile figures like Trump influence these discussions on podcasts?
*Dr. Roberts*: Trump’s involvement is significant because he remains a central figure in the Republican Party. His narrative interacts with and legitimizes the storytelling of these podcast hosts. When they repeat his claims or frame discussions around his allegations, they validate those ideas for their audience. It amplifies the message and can motivate listeners to act, whether through mobilization or financial support for related causes.
*Interviewer*: As a media analyst, what do you think should be done to counter this trend of misinformation in podcasts?
*Dr. Roberts*: Media literacy is crucial. Encouraging critical thinking and providing audiences with tools to differentiate between credible and unfounded claims can help combat misinformation. Additionally, platforms hosting these podcasts should consider implementing stricter guidelines around the spread of misleading narratives. Journalists and fact-checking organizations play a vital role in this fight, as well.
*Interviewer*: Thank you, Dr. Roberts. Your insights shed light on the complexities of misinformation in today’s media landscape.
*Dr. Roberts*: Thank you for bringing attention to this important issue. It’s vital that we continue these discussions.
