In a rapidly changing environment, cohesion policy remains the key European policy tool for promoting a balanced and sustainable development in the European regions.
The main issue, according to the General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF, Dimitris Skalkos, as he pointed out at the RGC Regional Conference, organized by the “Peloponnisos” newspaper from March 16 to 18, is to clarify the role of the cohesion policy, that is, we want it to address crises or implement long-term strategies.
For his part, the representative of the Hellenic Foundation for European and Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP) Giorgos Petrakos, we must define the priorities for the planning period after 2027, while to the question of where new resources will be drawn, he answered:
“Europe needs a ‘tax hand’ on large companies that generate huge values and are not taxed”. The following speakers also took part in the discussion: pr. General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF, Ministry of Development and Investments Giorgos Giannoussis,), Economist and Professor, Department of Public Investments, University of Thessaly Alekos Kritikos. The coordinator was Ioannis Papageorgiou, Director General, Regional Policy Observatory.
Athanasios Katsis, Chancellor of the University of Peloponnese
#RGC #Cohesion #Policy #Future
How might increased taxation on large corporations impact funding for cohesion policy initiatives, according to Dimitris Skalkos’ insights on economic growth and social equity?
**Interview with Dimitris Skalkos, General Secretary of Public Investments and NSRF**
*Interviewer:* Thank you for joining us today, Mr. Skalkos. At the recent RGC Regional Conference, you emphasized the need to clarify the role of cohesion policy amidst rapid changes in our environment. Can you elaborate on what you mean by addressing crises versus implementing long-term strategies?
*Dimitris Skalkos:* Certainly. Cohesion policy is fundamentally about promoting balanced regional development, but we are at a crossroads. On one hand, we must respond effectively to immediate crises, such as economic downturns or health emergencies. On the other hand, we cannot lose sight of long-term strategies that foster sustainable growth and resilience. The challenge is integrating these two approaches seamlessly within our policy framework.
*Interviewer:* That’s a significant balancing act. Giorgos Petrakos from ELIAMEP suggested that after 2027, it’s essential to define new priorities and resource allocations. What do you see as the key priorities moving forward?
*Dimitris Skalkos:* The priorities will undoubtedly evolve based on emerging challenges. However, digital transformation, climate change mitigation, and enhancing social cohesion are crucial. Moreover, we must engage in robust discussions about funding sources. As Mr. Petrakos pointed out, a more equitable taxation of large corporations could be one pathway to securing necessary resources.
*Interviewer:* Speaking of taxation, do you believe that implementing higher taxes on large companies is a feasible solution, particularly in the current economic climate?
*Dimitris Skalkos:* It’s a complex issue. While higher taxes on large corporations could provide additional funds for cohesion policy, it’s vital to ensure that such measures don’t stifle innovation or investment. The dialog must include various stakeholders to find a balanced approach that supports both economic growth and social equity.
*Interviewer:* Lastly, how do you envision the role of academic institutions, like the University of Peloponnese, in this process?
*Dimitris Skalkos:* Academic institutions are vital for research and innovation. They can help us understand the implications of our policies through data and analysis, guiding effective decision-making. Collaborations between policymakers and academia will be crucial as we navigate this dynamic landscape.
*Interviewer:* Thank you for sharing your insights, Mr. Skalkos. As we discuss the future of cohesion policy, how do readers view the idea of increased taxation on large corporations for funding these initiatives? Is this a necessary step towards achieving equitable development, or do you see potential downsides to such measures? Let the debate begin!