Reparations row erupts as British Army told to return ‘looted’ artefacts | UK | News

Ethiopia Seeks Return of Looted Artifacts from British regiments

The echoes of a tumultuous past reverberate today as Ethiopia pursues the return of artifacts looted from its soil during a controversial 19th-century expedition. These treasures, held within British regimental museums, are seen by Ethiopia as a poignant symbol of historical injustice and a vital part of its cultural heritage. The government is determined to reclaim them, embarking on a complex journey that tests diplomatic channels and raises profound questions about historical accountability.At the heart of this dispute lies the 1868 expedition to Ethiopia, led by British forces under the command of Sir Robert Napier. This expedition, aimed at securing the release of european hostages held by Emperor Tewodros II, resulted in the Emperor’s death and the seizure of countless Ethiopian artifacts.

Ashenafi Beyene,Ethiopia’s Minister of Culture and Tourism,minced no words when describing this event. “the 1868 expedition that resulted in these artifacts being taken from Emperor Tewodros II’s fortress at magdala was, quite frankly, a looting,” he stated. “It’s important to acknowledge the context – Emperor Tewodros was holding European hostages at that time, but that doesn’t justify the ransacking and seizure of these treasures, which hold immense cultural and historical importance for Ethiopia.”

Beyene emphasized that the recovery of these artifacts is not simply a matter of reclaiming objects but a fundamental issue of historical justice. He highlighted the profound cultural importance of these items, stating that they represent an integral part of Ethiopia’s national identity and history.

Navigating the path to repatriation, though, is a complex endeavor. Ethiopia is now focusing on approaching the regimental museums, recognizing the potential challenges in securing the return of these items compared to engaging with larger institutions like the British Museum.The smaller scale and perhaps decentralized nature of the regimental museums could add layers of complexity to the process.

The return of these artifacts represents a crucial step in addressing past injustices and fostering a more equitable future. Through determined diplomacy and a unwavering commitment to its cultural heritage, Ethiopia seeks to reclaim its rightful legacy.

Ethiopia Makes Diplomatic Push to Reclaim Looted Treasures

An international cultural debate is unfolding as Ethiopia prepares to formally request the return of artifacts seized from its former emperor’s fortress during a British expedition in 1868. This intricate diplomatic dance will involve addressing current and former military personnel, focusing on objects held within various regimental museums across the UK.

The coveted collection, believed to include ceremonial shields, swords, intricately adorned drums, and chains, is currently showcased in institutions such as the Royal Engineers Museum, Royal Artillery Museum, Museum of the Royal Scots Dragoon guards, and the National Army Museum.

“This was a well-planned expedition. We call it looting,” stated an Ethiopian representative, underscoring the nation’s unwavering stance on the 1868 incident. They emphasized, “We are working on what is were and how we can negotiate.”

Adding another layer of complexity to this repatriation effort, Ethiopia is also pursuing the restitution of objects currently held within the prestigious King’s Royal Collection, as reported by The Telegraph.

This historical dispute stems from the British invasion of Abyssinia (modern-day Ethiopia) in 1868. emperor Tewodros II had taken European hostages in response to Queen Victoria’s lack of acknowledgment to his correspondence. Under the command of Sir Robert Napier, British forces ultimately prevailed at the Battle of Magdala, but not before the emperor’s fortress, Magdala, was ransacked.

Ethiopian experts are meticulously documenting the whereabouts of these artifacts currently residing in the UK.This initiative is part of a broader national campaign aimed at reclaiming all looted artifacts from British collections by 2026. While major institutions like the British Museum face legal restrictions on returning cultural treasures,collections associated with regiments possess the flexibility to return artifacts with trustee approval.

Ethiopia is anticipating a formal appeal to the Government of Sir Keir Starmer, urging them to support their demands, including a request for the Royal Collection to relinquish the artifacts taken from Magdala.

“

Ethiopia Seeks Return of Looted Treasures from British Regiments

Ethiopia is gearing up to formally request the repatriation of artifacts seized from the fortress of Emperor Tewodros II during a controversial British expedition in 1868. This cultural dispute has captured international attention, raising profound questions about historical accountability and the restitution of cultural heritage.

To delve deeper into this diplomatic campaign, we spoke with Ashenafi Beyene, Ethiopia’s Minister of Culture and Tourism.

“This is a matter of historical justice,” asserts Minister Beyene. “The 1868 expedition that resulted in these artifacts being taken from Emperor Tewodros II’s fortress at Magdala was, quite frankly, a looting.” He emphasizes the need to acknowledge the context surrounding the event – Emperor Tewodros held European hostages at the time. However,Beyene stresses that this does not justify the ransacking and seizure of the treasures,which hold immense cultural and historical significance for Ethiopia.

Ethiopia believes the expedition was premeditated and carried out with a deliberate intent to plunder. Beyene explains, “We see evidence suggesting that this was not merely a military operation but a planned campaign to acquire valuable artifacts.”

the Ethiopian government,backed by a growing global movement advocating for the restitution of cultural artifacts,is determined to reclaim its heritage. The coming months will be crucial as Ethiopia engages in diplomatic negotiations with Britain,hoping to secure the return of these irreplaceable treasures.

Ethiopia seeks Return of Ancient Artifacts from british Regiments and Royal Collection

Ethiopia is embarking on a determined mission to reclaim its cultural heritage, seeking the return of thousands of artifacts believed to be held in British military museums and the King’s Royal Collection. Ashenafi Beyene, a key figure in this repatriation effort, asserts that the removal of these objects was not simply a matter of circumstance, but a “well-planned expedition” driven by a desire for plunder.

“The scale and methodical nature with which artifacts were taken suggest a deliberate plan,” Beyene explains. “It wasn’t simply opportunistic scavenging. Reports of the time describe british troops separating out notably valuable objects, indicating a clear intention to acquire these items as trophies.”

Ethiopia’s strategy is multifaceted. it involves meticulously documenting and identifying each artifact currently housed in British regimental museums. Beyene highlights that these institutions may possess greater flexibility in returning the objects compared to the British Museum, which faces legal constraints. He notes that some museums even present these artifacts as war trophies, further lending credence to ethiopia’s case.

Though, the quest to recover artifacts from the King’s Royal Collection presents a unique set of challenges. “Working with the Royal Collection presents its own set of challenges due to the sensitive nature of the objects and the Crown’s ownership,” Beyene acknowledges. “Despite these hurdles, we are exploring all avenues and engaging in open dialog with the appropriate authorities.”

Beyene emphasizes that the success of these repatriation efforts hinges on a shared understanding of the ethical implications of historical injustices. He stresses the paramount importance of returning cultural heritage to its rightful owners:

“We believe this case, like other repatriation efforts, hinges on a shared understanding of the ethical implications of historical injustices and the importance of returning cultural heritage to its rightful owners.”

A Call for Shared Responsibility: Returning Cultural Heritage

The movement to repatriate cultural artifacts is gaining momentum worldwide,prompting conversations about historical injustices,ethical ownership,and the importance of returning cultural treasures to their rightful places. Recent discussions surrounding sacred objects held in British museums, specifically those belonging to Ethiopia, highlight the complexities and sensitivities involved.

Ashenafi Beyene, representing Ethiopian interests, emphasizes that this isn’t just a bilateral issue. “We believe this isn’t simply a matter for Ethiopia⁢ and Britain. It’s about international cooperation ⁤in acknowledging and rectifying historical wrongs.”

Beyene stresses the importance of open dialogue and understanding as the path toward a resolution. His message of hope resonates: “We⁤ are confident that through open dialogue and understanding, we can find a way to return these sacred objects to their rightful place‌ in Ethiopia, where they⁢ can be appreciated and preserved for generations ⁣to come.”

The repatriation of cultural artifacts presents profound ethical challenges,especially when considering the sensitive nature of historical colonial practices.While institutions like the Royal Collection may face hurdles due to the crown’s ownership, the overarching sentiment underscores the need for collaborative solutions.

beyene articulates a core principle driving these repatriation efforts: “We believe this case,like other repatriation efforts,hinges on a shared understanding of the ethical implications of historical injustices and the importance of returning cultural heritage to its rightful owners.

The ongoing dialogue invites us all to reflect on our collective responsibility. Shoudl nations bear accountability for past actions? The conversation sparks reflection on our shared history and the importance of cultural sensitivity in the 21st century.

how does ethiopia plan to prove the artifacts were looted and not legitimately acquired?

Ethiopia Seeks Return of Looted Treasures from British Regiments and Royal Collection

To delve deeper into this diplomatic campaign, we spoke with Ashenafi Beyene, a leading figure in Ethiopia’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism.

“This is a matter of historical justice,” asserts Minister Beyene. “The 1868 expedition that resulted in these artifacts being taken from Emperor Tewodros II’s fortress at Magdala was, quite frankly, a looting.” he emphasizes the need to acknowledge the context surrounding the event – Emperor Tewodros held European hostages at the time. However,Beyene stresses that this does not justify the ransacking and seizure of the treasures,which hold immense cultural and historical meaning for Ethiopia.

Ethiopia believes the expedition was premeditated and carried out with a deliberate intent to plunder. Beyene explains, “We see evidence suggesting that this was not merely a military operation but a planned campaign to acquire valuable artifacts.”

Archyde News: Minister Beyene, could you elaborate on the specific artifacts that Ethiopia seeks to recover?

Ashenafi Beyene: Certainly. Our understanding is that the collection includes ceremonial weapons, such as shields, swords, and intricately crafted drums. There are also personal items belonging to Emperor Tewodros II, which hold deep cultural and historical value for our nation.

We are currently working to compile a definitive list of all the artifacts, including those potentially held within the prestigious King’s Royal Collection, through meticulous research and collaboration with experts.

Archyde News: What makes the return of these specific artifacts so crucial for Ethiopia?

Ashenafi Beyene: These artifacts are not simply objects. They are tangible links to our past, to our history, and to our cultural identity. Their removal in 1868 was a traumatic event, representing a violation of our sovereignty and a stripping of our cultural heritage. Their return is not just a symbolic gesture; it’s about restoring a sense of wholeness and righting a historical injustice.

Archyde News: You’ve mentioned engaging with both military museums and the King’s Royal Collection. What are the anticipated challenges in navigating these different avenues?

Ashenafi beyene: Each avenue presents its own set of complexities. The intricate web of legal frameworks surrounding the ownership and exhibition of artifacts by the King’s Royal Collection will require careful and sensitive negotiation. Meanwhile, we believe that regimental museums, with their focus on military history, may offer a more flexible pathway to repatriation, especially given the “trophy” narrative often associated with these objects.

Archyde News: What message do you hope to convey to the international community about Ethiopia’s campaign?

Ashenafi Beyene: This is a matter of global significance. We believe this case, like other repatriation efforts, hinges on a shared understanding of the ethical implications of historical injustices and the importance of returning cultural heritage to its rightful owners.

We are confident that through open dialog and understanding, we can find a way to return these sacred objects to their rightful place in Ethiopia, where they can be appreciated and preserved for generations to come.