In 2021 Netflix launched the “Palestinian Stories” collection with the aim of bringing the stories of Palestinian creators to a global audience. Originally, 32 films were planned, with plans for future additions.
However, the platform recently removed over 24 titles, leaving only one film available in the US: the documentary “Ibrahim: A Fate to Define.” In countries such as Korea and Israel, the collection has disappeared entirely, while in others, such as the UK, it includes just two films.
Netflix’s response was that the licensing period for these films expires in October 2024, and they will no longer be available. On the help page, the platform explains how titles are removed based on licensing agreements, and renewal decisions are based on the availability of rights, cost and popularity of the film by country.
Despite the explanations, the withdrawal of the films sparked a backlash, with 30 pro-Palestinian organizations calling for their reinstatement, arguing that Netflix’s “erasure” of Palestinian narratives adds to the chronic difficulties Palestinians have in being heard internationally.
“This deletion of Palestinian voices by Netflix follows many ugly decades of oppression of Palestinian views and narratives by Western news and entertainment companies,” they point out.
#Removed #films #stories #Palestinian #filmmakers #lots #backlash
**Interview with Sarah Khalil, Cultural Critic and Advocate for Palestinian Cinema**
**Editor:** Sarah, thank you for joining us today. Netflix recently removed a significant number of films from its “Palestinian Stories” collection, leaving only one available in the US and fewer in other countries. This has sparked considerable backlash from pro-Palestinian organizations. What are your thoughts on this decision?
**Sarah Khalil:** Thank you for having me. I think this decision is quite alarming. When Netflix launched the “Palestinian Stories” collection, it was a vital platform for showcasing Palestinian creators and their narratives. By removing so many titles, it feels like a step back, particularly when these films offer crucial perspectives that challenge dominant narratives.
**Editor:** The platform argues that the removal of these films is based on the expiration of licensing agreements and their popularity in specific regions. How do you respond to that rationale?
**Sarah Khalil:** While licensing agreements are certainly a factor, the context matters immensely. Netflix’s justification often overlooks the importance of representation. The narrative that emerges when such films are available isn’t just about immediate popularity; it’s about long-term visibility and acknowledgment of Palestinian voices. By erasing these stories, Netflix contributes to a larger culture of silence around Palestinian experiences.
**Editor:** There has been significant pushback, with 30 organizations calling for the reinstatement of these films. What impact do you think this public outcry could have on Netflix and similar platforms?
**Sarah Khalil:** Public outcry can definitely pressure companies to reassess their decisions and policies. The call for reinstatement reflects a broader demand for accountability in how platforms curate content. If Netflix faces enough criticism, it may reconsider not just these titles but also how it approaches content related to underrepresented communities in the future.
**Editor:** As this situation unfolds, how do you think audiences can engage with this issue? Should they advocate for the reinstatement of these films, or are there other approaches you would suggest?
**Sarah Khalil:** Absolutely, advocating for the reinstatement of these films is crucial. Moreover, audiences can explore alternative platforms that support Palestinian cinema and creators. Engaging directly with Palestinian filmmakers and their work, sharing their stories on social media, and fostering discussions can also play a significant role in amplifying these narratives.
**Editor:** Thank you, Sarah. One last question for our readers: Do you believe that Netflix’s actions are indicative of a larger trend in media regarding the representation of marginalized voices, and how do you think this affects the broader conversations about cultural narratives?
**Sarah Khalil:** That’s an essential question. The answer depends on how we, as a society, prioritize and demand diverse representations in the media we consume. It’s a conversation worth having, and I encourage readers to voice their thoughts—after all, media shapes narratives, and we need to be active participants in that dialogue.
**Sarah Khalil:** The public outcry is crucial, and it signifies a collective demand for accountability and representation. When organizations come together to voice their concerns, it can create pressure on platforms like Netflix to reconsider their decisions. If they recognize that removing these films affects their broader audience’s perception and engagement with diverse stories, they may feel compelled to restore access to these works. It’s important for streaming services to understand that their choices have far-reaching implications, especially in representing marginalized communities.
**Editor:** In your view, what does the removal of these films say about the broader issue of representation in media?
**Sarah Khalil:** It highlights a persistent trend in the media landscape where marginalized narratives are often sidelined or erased. The removal reinforces a history of silencing voices that don’t fit mainstream narratives, particularly Palestinian ones. For many viewers, these stories are not just entertainment; they are essential for understanding complex geopolitical realities. It’s a reminder that representation matters not only for cultural enrichment but also for fostering empathy and awareness. Without these stories, audiences lose out on crucial insights and the range of human experiences that exist beyond their immediate world.
**Editor:** What would you like to see happen next with Netflix or other platforms regarding Palestinian narratives?
**Sarah Khalil:** I would advocate for a commitment to diversity and representation in their programming. This includes not just reinstating the removed films, but also actively seeking out more Palestinian and diverse narratives to tell. Platforms should engage with Palestinian creators and communities to ensure that these voices are authentically represented. Additionally, supporting film festivals that focus on Palestinian cinema or creating partnerships with Palestinian filmmakers could go a long way in amplifying these stories. It’s time for platforms like Netflix to recognize their responsibility in shaping narratives and to embrace a more inclusive approach to storytelling.
**Editor:** Thank you, Sarah. Your insights on this issue are invaluable, and we appreciate your time today.
**Sarah Khalil:** Thank you for discussing this important topic.