The race for one of Pennsylvania‘s U.S. Senate seats remains contentious as an automatic recount commenced on Wednesday. According to state law, every county is mandated to finalize their recount by November 26, ensuring a swift and thorough examination of the ballots.
Officials in Philadelphia estimate that the intricate process of tabulating the massive volume of ballots cast in the state’s largest urban center could require as much as four days. In response to this objective, election staff in Philadelphia resumed their efforts Wednesday, meticulously counting ballots a second time in a dedicated warehouse in Northeast Philly.
As per the unofficial results, Republican candidate Dave McCormick currently leads incumbent Democrat Bob Casey by an approximate margin of 16,000 votes, a strikingly narrow gap in such a high-stakes race.
“That is a staggeringly close number considering that 36,604 Philadelphians chose to undervote the race,” stated Philadelphia Commissioner Lisa M Deeley (D), highlighting a significant percentage of voters who engaged in the election but deliberately bypassed the critical Senate contest. She emphasized the importance of every vote in down-ballot races, declaring, “This should serve as a wake-up call for all voters in Philadelphia and Pennsylvania. These down-ballot races, they matter.”
During the recount process, state law mandates counting the ballots using a different machine than the one employed in the initial tally, a measure designed to ensure the accuracy of the results. City Commissioner Seth Bluestein (R) reassured the public by stating, “We want to make sure the ballots are being scanned on different types of technology so we can be confident in the results.”
The state authorities are set to release the final results of the recount on the day before Thanksgiving, creating a palpable tension as the nation awaits the outcome. While Bob Casey has yet to concede, Dave McCormick has preemptively declared victory in this fiercely contested race. Notably, this marks the fourth recount in Pennsylvania’s electoral history since 2004, and previous instances have never altered the final results.
More from CBS News
Liz Crawford, a Jersey native, is thrilled to join CBS News Philadelphia, returning to her roots to share community stories and hold the powerful accountable. Liz brings a passion for storytelling and a deep connection to the communities she serves.
How might the Pennsylvania Senate race recount influence voter confidence in the electoral process, especially in a closely contested election like this?
**Interview with Political Analyst Jane Doe on the Pennsylvania Senate Race Recount**
**Interviewer (I):** Thank you for joining us today, Jane. Let’s dive right in. We’ve seen that the automatic recount for the Pennsylvania U.S. Senate seat began this week. What are the key elements at play in this recount process?
**Jane Doe (JD):** Thank you for having me. The recount is crucial because every vote can change the outcome, especially in a race as close as this one between Dave McCormick and Bob Casey. According to Pennsylvania law, this automatic recount was triggered due to the narrow margin—currently about 16,000 votes in favor of McCormick. It’s essential that every county finalizes their counts by November 26 to ensure the process is swift and thorough [[1](https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/bob-casey-recount-dave-mccormick-senate-race/)].
**I:** Speaking of the counties, how will the process vary, especially in urban areas like Philadelphia where the volume of ballots is substantial?
**JD:** That’s a great point. Philadelphia is the largest city in Pennsylvania and has a significant number of ballots to count. Officials there estimate it could take up to four days just to finish tabulating all those votes, given the complexity involved in ensuring accuracy [[1](https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/bob-casey-recount-dave-mccormick-senate-race/)]. They have brought in election staff to work in a dedicated warehouse to count the ballots a second time, which speaks to the city’s commitment to a transparent recount process.
**I:** With the unofficial results showing McCormick leading, what implications could this recount have for both candidates?
**JD:** If McCormick maintains his lead, it would solidify a significant victory for Republicans in Pennsylvania, which could impact the party’s strategy for future elections in the state. On the other hand, if Casey manages to close the gap or even overtake McCormick in the recount, it could reinvigorate his campaign and validate the support he has among Democrats. Ultimately, the recount will be vital in determining not just the immediate outcome, but also the political landscape in Pennsylvania moving forward [[1](https://www.cbsnews.com/philadelphia/news/bob-casey-recount-dave-mccormick-senate-race/)].
**I:** Thank you, Jane, for your insights on this evolving situation. It will be interesting to see how the recount unfolds in the coming days.
**JD:** Thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to seeing how this plays out as well!