Voting for second and fourth place on the Storting list for the Oslo Labor Party was due when the county team gathered for a nomination meeting in the traditional Samfunnssalen in Oslo on Tuesday evening. The members of the nomination committee have not agreed among themselves on who should have the safe second place, as well as the fourth place on the list.
– We have not succeeded, admitted election committee leader Rina Mariann Hansen after explaining the considerable efforts the committee has made through many and long meetings to arrive at a unanimous recommendation for the Storting list.
The majority of the committee nominates Hadia Tajik for the safe second place on the nomination list. The minority wants Kamzy Gunaratnam. If Ap’s support remains at its current level at the election next year, the party is likely to get only three representatives from Oslo in the Storting.
– We have a small group of politicians in Norway who can face Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg in a debate and come out victorious. Hadia is one of them, said Hansen.
– On the whistleblower’s side
Hansen also pointed out that “there were few who stood as straight-backed” on the side of whistleblowers as Hadia Tajik when the metoo dispute ravaged the party. The then deputy leader of the Labor Party, Trond Giske, resigned in 2018 after several women reported him.
The party leadership concluded that Giske had broken the party’s guidelines against sexual harassment. Giske has contested this and also several of the notifications, but has also apologized for his behaviour.
Gunaratnam has the second place on today’s list and is nominated for the same place by the minority – consisting of one of nine members – on the committee.
– Who will take the fight for Oslo? The Oslo list is traditionally characterized by national politicians. Kamzy grew up in Groruddalen, is a popular Oslo politician, former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF, said Laial Janet Ayoub.
Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is, by all accounts, beaten into first place, and so is deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre in third place.
Completely even
Until recently, there was a dead heat between Tajik and Gunaratnam, according to him VG. Each of them received support from 105 delegates, the count the newspaper had carried out showed.
Gunaratnam is said to have led quite clearly earlier this autumn, with the support of more than twice as many delegates as Tajik. But Tajik is said to have taken the lead in recent weeks, the newspaper wrote.
As it is competitive voting, voting must be done in writing. It will make it easier for the delegates to break with their local team and vote according to their own convictions. The counting and mapping of how the local teams are positioned is therefore fraught with uncertainty.
If there is a deadlock, there will be a new written vote. If it also ends in a tie, the nomination will be decided by drawing lots, the rules of procedure state.
National versus local
Tajik’s supporters have highlighted the difficult position she has had in the Labor Party as both deputy leader and minister and the implementation power she has to show time.
Gunaratnam’s supporters have been skeptical that there is a lack of local political voice if only candidates who are widely perceived as national politicians are elected. Some also have opposite The daily newspaper expressed skepticism that Tajik is “shopping counties” after she reported moving from Rogaland to Oslo.
In addition to the battle for second place, there are also two battles for fourth place.
Here, Agnes Nærland Viljugrein has the support of a majority in the nomination committee, while the minority wanted Trine Lise Sundnes.
Frode Jacobsen is set for fifth place on the list.
#Ready #battle #parliamentary #seats #Oslo #Labor #Party
What impact might the outcome of this nomination battle have on the future direction of the Oslo Labor Party?
## Clash of Titans: Oslo Labor Party Torn Between Tajik and Gunaratnam
**(News Anchor):** Welcome back. The Oslo Labor Party is facing an interesting dilemma as they prepare for the upcoming parliamentary elections. Two strong contenders, Hadia Tajik and Kamzy Gunaratnam, are vying for the highly coveted second spot on the Storting list. Joining us today to discuss this political battle is political analyst, Dr. Lars Heggen. Dr. Heggen, thanks for joining us.
**(Dr. Heggen):** My pleasure. I’m always happy to discuss Oslo politics. It’s shaping up to be a fascinating race.
**(News Anchor):** Indeed! Both Tajik and Gunaratnam are highly regarded within the party. What distinguishes them, and what are their strengths and weaknesses coming into this nomination process?
**(Dr Heggen):** Hadia Tajik brings national recognition and undeniable debating prowess. The committee chair highlighted her ability to stand up against formidable political opponents like Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg. She also earned kudos for her unwavering support of whistleblowers during the MeToo movement within the party. Gunaratnam, on the other hand, has deep roots in Oslo, a strong local following, and a impressive track record as former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF. He is viewed as a champion for local issues and someone who truly understands the needs of Oslo residents.
**(News Anchor):** It seems the committee is struggling to reach a consensus. Why the divide, and what implications could this have?
**(Dr. Heggen):** The committee is clearly torn between recognizing Tajik’s national appeal and Gunaratnam’s strong local connections. This highlights a crucial debate within the party – whether to prioritize a figure who can engage on a national stage or someone who deeply understands the needs of Oslo constituents. Ultimately, the decision reflects a larger conversation about the balance between national and local representation within the Labor Party.
**(News Anchor):**
There you have it, a glimpse into the ongoing battle within the Oslo Labor Party. Dr. Lars Heggen, thank you for sharing your insights.
**(Dr. Heggen):** Always a pleasure.
**(News Anchor):** We’ll continue to follow this story closely as it unfolds. Back to you, Tom.
