The seventh day conducted a live broadcast with Dr. Magdi Mahran, the lawyer of the artist Rashwan Tawfiq, in which he monitored the details of the ruling session in the case of Aya Rashwan Tawfiq against her father, the artist Rashwan Tawfiq, her sister Heba Allah Rashwan, her niece Omaima Tawfiq Rashwan, and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Cooperative Society for Construction and Housing.
Circuit 11 Civilians of the South Cairo Court issues a ruling in the case today, Monday, as it was stated in the subject matter of Case No. 3127 of 2021: The student and the one announced to them in common owns from their inheritance the late Omaima Abdel Rahman, a chalet in a project in Ras Sidr, South Sinai, and according to the preliminary sale contract Dated on August 17, 2020, and issued between the fourth advertiser as a first party seller, and the student and the second and third advertisers – as a second party purchases – the latter contracted to buy the two-storey chalet in Ras Sidr, and this sale took place for one hundred thousand pounds, which was fully paid .
The issuance of the contract explicitly stipulated that the student and the second and third announced to have the right to one-third share according to the official report issued by the Qasr al-Nil Prosecution for Family Affairs No. 14 of 2005, the affairs of the Qasr al-Nil family, a guardianship over money.
The plaintiff also owns on her mother’s behalf another chalet in the city of Ras Sidr in South Sinai under a preliminary sale contract between the fourth advertiser as a first party seller, and the second and third advertisers – as a second party buyer – the latter contracted to buy Chalet No. 9 in the owners’ union project in Ras Sidr, This sale was for a sum of one hundred thousand pounds.
The contract explicitly stipulates that the student and the second and third advertisers have the right to one-third share according to the official report issued by the Qasr al-Nil Prosecution for Family Affairs No.
The lawsuit added that the student had previously issued a comprehensive, general power of attorney to her father, who was notified by the first, so she was surprised that the power of attorney was used in collusion with the second and third advertisers without her knowledge, by issuing two division contracts for the two chalets, the subject of the case, with the purpose of ending the state of commonality between the student and the announcer of the second and third, and for the first advertiser to sign my contract Division, as an agent on behalf of the student, a share less than her real share specified.