Moscow could decide to strike those countries that have authorized Ukraine to use long-range missiles to strike deep into Russian territory. The warning comes directly from Russian President Vladimir Russia's energy exports correspond to the Asia-Pacific”>Putin. “The conflict in Ukraine has acquired elements of a global character after attacks by Western long-range missiles against Russia,” the Kremlin chief said in a televised address to the nation. “It is impossible to use long-range weapons on Russian territory without specialists from the countries where they were produced, this is known,” the Russian president remarked. Hence the warning: «Russia considers itself authorized to use weapons against the military structures of countries that authorize the use of their weapons against Russia». Moscow, the Russian president further explained, “will respond decisively and speculate in the event of escalation”. Putin reassured of his intention to resolve the disputes “by peaceful means”. But, at the same time, the message is clear: “Russia is ready for any development of events.”
The Russian president then announced that Moscow had tested a new intermediate-range missile in an attack on Ukraine. The move came in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian territory with US and British missiles earlier in the week. Putin explained that advance warnings will be issued if there are further attacks with these missiles against Ukraine, to allow civilians to evacuate safely. This is also because, Putin underlined, “US air defense systems would not be able to intercept Russian missiles”. On the contrary, «Russian air defense systems repelled attacks by Western long-range missiles on the territory of Russia, the enemy’s objectives were not achieved». From Kiev the accusation is that the missile launched from Moscow “looks like an intercontinental ballistic missile”. According to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, Putin “is using Ukraine as a testing ground.” However, after initial information from the Ukrainian Air Force, a Western official raised doubts whether it was indeed a missile of that caliber. The fact remains that long-range missiles represent a new phase of the war. As highlighted by the Russian ambassador to the United Kingdom, Andrei Kelin, with the use of British Storm Shadow missiles on Russian soil «Britain is now directly involved in the war».
“These fights cannot take place without the intervention of NATO and Great Britain,” the ambassador remarked. Zelensky’s presidential advisor, Mykhailo Podolyak, speaking to LaPresse about the use of Western missiles, highlighted how “the decisions of our partners will have an extremely important impact on the course of the war as a whole.” “Right now we are already seeing a panic reaction from Russia, which it is trying to disguise with classic ‘nuclear threats’ and the use of various missile formats for mass attacks against civilians,” commented Podolyak.
#Escalation #Mirror #response #conflict #global #Tempo
Here are two People Also Ask (PAA) related questions based on the provided text:
Today we sit down with Dr. Anya Petrova, a leading expert on Russian foreign policy from the Institute for International Studies. Dr. Petrova, thank you for joining us.
**Dr. Petrova:** My pleasure.
**Host:** Recently, President Putin delivered a televised address making a number of concerning statements regarding long-range missiles and the potential targeting of countries supplying weapons to Ukraine. Could you shed some light on his remarks?
**Dr. Petrova:** Indeed, Putin’s words are certainly alarming. He claims that Western-supplied long-range missiles striking Russian territory necessitate a Russian response, potentially targeting military infrastructure in the countries that provided these weapons. This marks a significant escalation in rhetoric and presents a dangerous possibility of direct confrontation between Russia and NATO members.
**Host:** Putin also announced the testing of a new Russian intermediate-range missile in response to Ukrainian attacks using Western-supplied missiles. What are your thoughts on this development?
**Dr. Petrova:** This new missile test is a demonstration of Moscow’s military might and its willingness to respond forcefully. While Putin claims it’s in response to Ukrainian attacks, it’s hard to ignore the broader context – Russia seeking to assert its dominance and deter further Western support for Ukraine. The uncertainty around the missile’s exact capabilities adds another layer of tension.
**Host:** How do you interpret Putin’s statement that Russia considers itself authorized to use weapons against the military infrastructure of countries that authorize the use of their weapons against Russia?
**Dr. Petrova:** This statement reflects a dangerous expansion of Russia’s perceived sphere of influence and acceptable targets. Essentially, Putin is blurring the lines between direct conflict and indirect involvement, threatening to broaden the scope of the war and potentially drag NATO countries into direct military confrontation.
**Host:** Given these developments, what are the potential ramifications for the international community?
**Dr. Petrova:** The situation is incredibly precarious. Putin’s threats raise the specter of a wider war with potentially catastrophic consequences. It further highlights the need for diplomatic solutions and de-escalation efforts to prevent a dangerous spiral of violence. The international community must condemn these threats and work towards a peaceful resolution to the conflict.
**Host:** Thank you for your insightful analysis, Dr. Petrova. We appreciate you shedding some light on this complex and concerning situation.
**Dr. Petrova:** It was my pleasure.
