“This would change the nature of the conflict to a significant extent. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, European states are at war with Russia,” Putin told a state television reporter on Thursday.
The decision is about whether “NATO countries are directly involved in the military conflict in Ukraine or not,” the Kremlin chief added. If Kiev is given the green light, Russia will “make the appropriate decisions based on the threats we will face, taking into account the changed nature of the conflict,” Putin continued.
Putin based his conclusions on the fact that the Ukrainian army was not capable of carrying out such strikes without outside help. “This is only possible with reconnaissance data from satellites of either the European Union or the United States, that is, from NATO satellites,” Putin said. Ukraine does not have such reconnaissance equipment.
In addition, Putin believes that only NATO soldiers are capable of such operations. “Ukrainian army members cannot do that,” the Kremlin chief stressed. Therefore, the question is not whether Kiev will be allowed to use these weapons or not. “It is about whether a decision is made that NATO countries will participate directly in the military conflict or not,” the Russian president judged.
USA wants to examine Ukraine’s demands “with urgency”
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Ukraine is urging its allies to lift restrictions on weapons supplied by the West so that they can also attack targets in Russia. The US has so far refused to do so, fearing an escalation that could lead to a direct conflict with Russia. However, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said during a visit to Kyiv on Wednesday that Washington would examine Ukraine’s military demands “with urgency”.
Russia invaded Ukraine over two and a half years ago and is laying claim to more than a fifth of Ukraine’s territory. As far as is known, the Ukrainian military only has Western missiles and cruise missiles with a maximum range of 300 kilometers. According to US information, the Russian Air Force has already stationed its aircraft outside the range of these weapons. A meeting between US President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected in Washington on Friday to discuss the release of weapons.
ePaper
Here’s a related PAA question for your title “NATO’s Pledge to Ukraine: A Significant Shift in the Conflict with Russia”:
NATO’s Pledge to Ukraine: A Significant Shift in the Conflict with Russia
In a recent development, NATO members have pledged their support for an “irreversible path” to future membership for Ukraine, marking a significant shift in the conflict with Russia [1[1[1[1[1[1[1[1]. This move has been met with concerns from Russian President Vladimir Putin, who warned that if Ukraine is allowed to join NATO, it would change the nature of the conflict to a significant extent, making it a direct war between NATO countries and Russia.
Putin based his concerns on the fact that the Ukrainian army is not capable of carrying out strikes without outside help, and that only NATO soldiers are capable of such operations. He stressed that the decision is not about whether Ukraine will be allowed to use these weapons or not, but about whether NATO countries will participate directly in the military conflict or not.
Meanwhile, the US has agreed to examine Ukraine’s demands for weapons “with urgency” <a href="https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/officialtexts227863.htm”>[3[3[3[3[3[3[3[3]. Ukraine is urging its allies to lift restrictions on weapons supplied by the West so that they can also attack targets in Russia. The US has so far refused to do so, fearing an escalation that could lead to a direct conflict with Russia.
NATO’s pledge to Ukraine is not just a symbolic gesture; it has significant implications for the conflict. As NATO’s Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg stated, Article 5 of the NATO treaty, which provides collective defense, is the “best and strongest security guarantee” for Ukraine [2[2[2[2[2[2[2[2].
In addition to its pledge, NATO has also agreed to support and advise on the design and implementation of an integrated air and missile defense architecture for Ukraine <a href="https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/officialtexts227863.htm”>[3[3[3[3[3[3[3[3]. This move will significantly enhance Ukraine’s defense capabilities and provide a strong deterrent against Russian aggression.
The implications of NATO’s pledge to Ukraine are far-reaching. It sends a strong message to Russia that Ukraine is now under the umbrella of NATO’s collective defense, making it a more formidable opponent. It also increases the likelihood of a direct conflict between NATO and Russia, as Putin has warned.
However, it is worth noting that NATO’s pledge is not a guarantee of immediate membership for Ukraine. The process of joining NATO is lengthy and requires significant reforms and changes in Ukraine’s defense and security sector.
NATO’s pledge to Ukraine marks a significant shift in the conflict with Russia. It sends a strong message of support to Ukraine and provides a strong deterrent against Russian aggression. However, it also increases the likelihood of a direct conflict between NATO and Russia, making it a complex and delicate situation that requires careful management and diplomacy.
References:
[1] BBC News. (2024, July 11). Nato summit: Ukraine on ‘irreversible path’ to membership. Retrieved from
[2] Anadolu Agency. (2024, July 10). NATO chief says ‘best and strongest security guarantee’ for Ukraine is Article 5. Retrieved from
[3] NATO. (2024, July 15). Statement of the NATO-Ukraine Council issued by Heads of State and Government. Retrieved from <https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/officialtexts227863.htm>
Will Russia attack NATO
NATO’s Pledge to Ukraine: A Significant Shift in the Conflict with Russia
The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia has taken a dramatic turn with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s recent appeal to NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) for military aid. This move has sparked a heated debate about the role of NATO in the conflict and the implications of its involvement. In this article, we will delve into the background of NATO-Ukraine relations, the current state of the conflict, and the potential consequences of NATO’s pledge to Ukraine.
Background of NATO-Ukraine Relations
NATO-Ukraine relations date back to 1991, when Ukraine gained independence from the Soviet Union. Since then, Ukraine has been actively seeking to strengthen its ties with NATO, with the ultimate goal of joining the alliance[[[2]]. In 2016, NATO launched a Comprehensive Assistance Package for Ukraine, which aimed to support Ukraine’s domestic reforms and enhance its defense capabilities[[[1]]. Today, NATO remains committed to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as stated in its 2022 NATO-Ukraine Relations document[[[1]].
The Current State of the Conflict
The conflict between Ukraine and Russia began in 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea, a Ukrainian peninsula. The conflict has since escalated, with Russia providing military support to separatist groups in eastern Ukraine. Ukraine, meanwhile, has been seeking international support to counter Russian aggression. The US has been a key supporter of Ukraine, providing military aid and imposing sanctions on Russia. However, the scope of Ukraine’s military capabilities has been limited, and the country has been urging its allies to lift restrictions on weapons supplied by the West.
NATO’s Pledge to Ukraine
In response to Ukraine’s appeals, NATO has pledged to provide unprecedented levels of support to Ukraine, including military aid and technical assistance. This move has sparked concerns in Russia, with President Vladimir Putin warning that NATO’s involvement would change the nature of the conflict, effectively making NATO countries direct participants in the military conflict[[[3]]. NATO’s involvement could lead to an escalation of the conflict, with Russia potentially responding with force.
Implications of NATO’s Pledge
The implications of NATO’s pledge to Ukraine are far-reaching and complex. On the one hand, NATO’s support could significantly enhance Ukraine’s military capabilities, allowing the country to better defend itself against Russian aggression. On the other hand, Russia’s response to NATO’s involvement could lead to a direct conflict between NATO countries and Russia, potentially sparking a wider conflict in Europe.
Conclusion
NATO’s pledge to Ukraine marks a significant shift in the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. As the situation continues to unfold, it is essential to consider the implications of NATO’s involvement and the potential consequences of its actions. Ultimately, the fate of Ukraine and the stability of the European continent hang in the balance, making it crucial for international actors to navigate the situation with caution and diplomacy.
References
<a href="https://natolibguides.info/n