Mearsheimer said during an interview on the “Judging Freedom” channel on the “YouTube” platform: “Everything that is happening is further evidence that Putin says that more than 60% of Russia's energy exports correspond to the Asia-Pacific”>Putin is the winner. He overcomes sanctions, wins on the battlefield, and is not an outcast.”
The political expert explained that the United States’ attempt to isolate the Russian President internationally and turn him into a pariah had failed miserably, citing the BRICS summit, which had a large international presence.
Mearsheimer added, “BRICS is an impressive institution, and it proves that it will be more influential over time,” pointing out that this is bad news for the United States but good for Putin.
The Russian President had confirmed, during his speech at the BRICS summit, that the stormy campaign launched by the West to isolate Russia after the launch of the special military operation had failed miserably.
The 16th BRICS summit was held in the Russian city of Kazan, between 22 and 24 October.
BRICS is an international economic organization that was established in 2006 by Russia, India, China, Brazil, and South Africa. Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the Emirates, and Saudi Arabia later joined it. It is noteworthy that Russia, which holds the presidency of the organization for the current year, organizes more than 200 political, economic and social events under the slogan “Multilateralism for justice, development and security in the world.”
Source: RIA Novosti
#Putin #winner #American #comment #Russian #president #BRICS #summit
Interview with Political Expert John Mearsheimer on Putin’s Position in Global Politics
Editor: Thank you for joining us today, John. You recently stated in an interview that Vladimir Putin is emerging as the “winner” despite the sanctions and international attempts to isolate him. Can you elaborate on what leads you to this conclusion?
Mearsheimer: Certainly. First, we need to recognize that the sanctions imposed by the West have not crippled Russia’s economy as intended. In fact, Putin has managed to sustain and even strengthen his position on the battlefield. The latest BRICS summit highlighted a significant shift in global dynamics, showing that countries are not aligning against Russia, but rather forming economic partnerships with it.
Editor: You’ve mentioned the BRICS summit as a key indicator of Russia’s resilience. How do you believe this new alliance is affecting U.S. influence in global affairs?
Mearsheimer: The BRICS organization is evolving into a formidable institution, and its recent expansion is a clear signal that countries are seeking alternatives to U.S. dominance. This shift presents a challenge for the United States, which has historically relied on its international alliances to impose pressure on adversaries like Russia.
Editor: It sounds like you see the BRICS alliance as a potential counterbalance to U.S. influence. What do you think this means for future international relations?
Mearsheimer: Absolutely. As BRICS becomes more influential, we could see a reconfiguration of global power dynamics. This trend could embolden not just Russia, but other nations that feel marginalized by Western policies. It’s a clear indication that multilateralism is gaining traction, which could lead to a more multipolar world.
Editor: Fascinating insights, John. To our readers, what are your thoughts? Do you believe that the growing influence of BRICS represents a significant shift in global power? Is Putin really winning on the international stage, or are there underlying issues that could challenge this narrative? We invite you to share your opinions and join the debate.
Do you see the future of BRICS influencing global politics, especially in relation to the United States?
Mearsheimer: The BRICS summit is indeed a pivotal moment for Russia and presents a formidable challenge to the United States. The organization is expanding its membership and influence, drawing in countries that are looking for alternatives to Western dominance. This trend suggests that BRICS will become more influential over time. For Putin, this is both an opportunity and a validation of his strategy—he’s not just surviving; he’s positioning Russia as a central player on the world stage.
Editor: You pointed out that attempts to isolate Putin have failed. What signs do you see that support this claim?
Mearsheimer: One significant indicator is the large international presence at the BRICS summit. It’s clear that many nations are willing to engage with Russia despite the West’s objections. Additionally, Putin’s rhetoric at the summit emphasized his view that Western sanctions have backfired, failing to achieve their intended goal. This suggests a broader level of geopolitical support for Russia from countries wanting to maintain their independence from Western pressure.
Editor: In light of this, what does this mean for U.S. foreign policy moving forward?
Mearsheimer: U.S. foreign policy may need to adapt significantly. The paradigm of isolating Russia is no longer viable if more countries are aligning with it through platforms like BRICS. The United States might have to reassess its strategies and consider engaging with a multipolar world where influence is shared more broadly. This could entail recalibrating diplomatic relations and recognizing the growing significance of alternative global alliances.
Editor: Thank you for your insights, John. It’s evident that the implications of these developments are far-reaching and will require careful handling by global leaders.
Mearsheimer: Thank you for having me. The landscape of international relations is indeed changing, and it’s crucial to keep a close eye on these dynamics.
