Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Parliamentary Committee meeting is going on in the Parliament House, in which Aslam Ghamman was allegedly not allowed to attend.
The meeting held on Monday was presided over by Leader of the Opposition Umar Ayub, Salman Akram Raja, Zartaj Gul, Asad Qaiser, Aamir Dogar, Sanaullah Mastikhel, Muhammad Khan, Shandana Gulzar, Khawaja Shiraz, Atif Khan and Shahid Khattak participated in the meeting.
Tehreek-e-Insaf’s announcement to be a part of the Parliamentary Judicial Commission established under the 26th Amendment
During the meeting, the names of the nominees of PTI were discussed in the judicial commission and the resignations of the members of the assembly who received the show were also considered.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
Meanwhile, Aslam Ghaman was expelled from the parliamentary party meeting. When Aslam Ghaman reached room number five, he was asked to go out.
Imran Khan is afraid of a deal on the bail of his sisters
According to the sources, the members present in the parliamentary committee objected to the participation of Aslam Ghamman and said that those who have been issued show-cause notices cannot participate in the meeting.
The journalist asked him why his head was taken out. To which he replied that I am going to pray.
Later, the statement of the meeting was issued, which said that PTI’s Parliamentary Party has approved to be part of the Judicial Commission, the Parliamentary Party supported the decision of the Political Committee.
In the statement, it was said that the protest movement has been approved along with the schedule of meetings across the country.
According to the statement, the current session of the National Assembly, the 26th amendment and the political situation were also reviewed in the meeting, the legal strategy for pursuing the political cases against the founder PTI was also considered and it was decided that his Vigorous and effective protests against unjust imprisonment will continue.
In the statement, it was said that the founder of PTI has been kept in solitary confinement for political purposes. Strict action will be taken against those members who have stood by the ideology, those members who have betrayed the party, disciplinary action against such members will be taken to its logical conclusion.
#PTIs #parliamentary #committee #meeting #Aslam #Ghamman #kicked #room #Pakistan
Samira Khan, MD
**Interview with Political Analyst, Dr. Samira Khan, on PTI’s Recent Internal Developments**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Khan. We’ve heard that Brigadier (retd) Aslam Ghumman was barred from attending the recent Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf parliamentary committee meeting. Can you shed some light on what this means for PTI?
**Dr. Khan**: Thank you for having me. The barring of Aslam Ghumman from the meeting is indeed significant. It could indicate internal strife within the PTI, suggesting that there are possibly factions at play. Aslam Ghumman is a noted figure within the party, and excluding him raises questions about unity and decision-making processes within the PTI parliamentary committee.
**Interviewer**: The meeting was presided over by key figures including Umar Ayub and Salman Akram Raja. What was the primary focus of this meeting?
**Dr. Khan**: The committee convened to discuss several important topics, including PTI’s participation in the Parliamentary Judicial Commission established under the 26th Amendment. They outlined nominees for the commission, which shows PTI’s active role in legislative reforms. Additionally, they considered the resignations of assembly members—a sign that they are responding to challenges within the assembly and possibly strategizing for future movements.
**Interviewer**: Given the current political climate in Pakistan, how do you see PTI navigating these challenges?
**Dr. Khan**: PTI is at a crossroads. With the turbulent political landscape and internal pressures, it’s crucial for them to maintain internal cohesion while effectively representing their interests in the assembly. The barring of a prominent figure like Ghumman could create tensions, and how they manage these internal conflicts will likely influence their legislative effectiveness moving forward.
**Interviewer**: Interesting insights, Dr. Khan. Is there any indication that Ghumman’s exclusion will have long-term effects on his relationship within the party or its direction?
**Dr. Khan**: That remains to be seen. If Ghumman chooses to voice his dissent publicly, it could lead to greater divisions within the party. Conversely, if he stays loyal, it might just be a temporary hiccup. The PTI leadership will need to handle this delicately to avoid setting a precedent of exclusion that could alienate other members.
**Interviewer**: Thank you, Dr. Khan, for your perspective on this evolving situation. It’s clear that PTI has some challenging times ahead, and your insights will help our audience stay informed.
**Dr. Khan**: Thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to seeing how PTI navigates these challenges in the near future.
