The arrested Members of National Assembly (MNAs) of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) challenged the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision of 8-day physical remand in the Islamabad High Court.
PTI leaders Sheikh Waqas Akram, Shoaib Shaheen, Zain Qureshi and Sher Afzal Marwat filed the review petitions through lawyers Ali Bukhari and Adil Aziz Qazi.
In the filed petitions, it was argued that the Anti-Terrorism Court granted the physical remand of the PTI leaders in haste, the reasons for granting the physical remand were not written in the trial court’s decision, the Anti-Terrorism Court in the FIR. Passed judgment without evaluating the character.
In these petitions, it was further said that the anti-terrorism decision is against the principles of law, truth and justice, the reasons for granting physical remand were not written in the trial court’s decision, the anti-terrorism decision is against the principles of law, truth and justice. is
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
In the petition, the court has been requested to grant the revision petition and annul the decision of the Anti-Terrorism Court.
It should be noted that yesterday, Islamabad Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Abul Hasanat Zul-Qarnain sent Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leaders Sher Afzal Marwat, Aamir Dogar, Zain Qureshi, Naseem Shah, Ahmad Chatta and others to 8-day physical remand. It was handed over to the police.
According to the order issued by the court, the accused handed over to the police on physical remand have been ordered to appear before the court again on September 18.
#PTI #members #National #Assembly #challenged #decision #physical #remand #Islamabad #High #Court #Pakistan
2024-09-13 09:26:05
What legal grounds do the PTI MNAs present in their challenge against the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision regarding their physical remand?
Table of Contents
PTI MNAs Challenge Anti-Terrorism Court’s Decision in Islamabad High Court
In a recent development, the arrested Members of National Assembly (MNAs) of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) have challenged the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision of 8-day physical remand in the Islamabad High Court. The PTI leaders, including Sheikh Waqas Akram, Shoaib Shaheen, Zain Qureshi, and Sher Afzal Marwat, filed review petitions through their lawyers, Ali Bukhari and Adil Aziz Qazi, arguing that the Anti-Terrorism Court granted physical remand in haste without evaluating the character and without providing sufficient reasons [[2]].
The petitions argued that the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision is against the principles of law, truth, and justice, and that the reasons for granting physical remand were not written in the trial court’s decision. The PTI leaders’ lawyers requested the court to grant the revision petition and annul the decision.
The Islamabad High Court has taken notice of the matter and has questioned the cases filed against the PTI MNAs, with one judge even remarking that the FIR could be a script for a comedy film [[2]]. This raises questions about the validity and legitimacy of the cases filed against the PTI leaders.
The PTI MNAs were arrested from the Parliament House’s premises in a late-night raid earlier this week and were produced in the National Assembly [[3]]. The incident has sparked widespread criticism and protest from the PTI leadership and its supporters.
The Islamabad High Court’s decision on the review petition is pending, and it remains to be seen whether the court will grant the revision petition and annul the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision. The outcome of this case has significant implications for the PTI leadership and the political landscape of Pakistan.
In a related development, a video has surfaced on YouTube showing the arrested PTI MNAs being produced in the National Assembly [[1]]. The video has sparked outrage and concern among PTI supporters and human rights activists.
As the legal battle unfolds, one thing is certain – the incident has highlighted the need for greater transparency and accountability in Pakistan’s judicial system. The world is watching, and the Islamabad High Court’s decision will have far-reaching consequences for the country’s democracy and rule of law.
References:
What are the main legal arguments presented by the PTI MNAs in their challenge to the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision for physical remand?
PTI MNAs Challenge Anti-Terrorism Court’s Decision in Islamabad High Court
In a recent development, the arrested Members of National Assembly (MNAs) of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) have challenged the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision of 8-day physical remand in the Islamabad High Court. The PTI leaders, including Sheikh Waqas Akram, Shoaib Shaheen, Zain Qureshi, and Sher Afzal Marwat, filed review petitions through their lawyers, Ali Bukhari and Adil Aziz Qazi, arguing that the Anti-Terrorism Court granted physical remand in haste without evaluating the character and without providing sufficient reasons [[2]].
Grounds for Challenge
The petitions argued that the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision is against the principles of law, truth, and justice, and that the reasons for granting physical remand were not written in the trial court’s decision. The PTI leaders’ lawyers requested the court to grant the revision petition and annul the decision.
Islamabad High Court’s Notice
The Islamabad High Court has taken notice of the matter and has questioned the cases filed against the PTI MNAs, with one judge even remarking that the FIR could be a script for a comedy film [[2]]. This raises questions about the validity and legitimacy of the cases filed against the PTI leaders.
Arrest and Production
The PTI MNAs were arrested from the Parliament House’s premises in a late-night raid earlier this week and were produced in the National Assembly [[3]]. The incident has sparked widespread criticism and protest from the PTI leadership and its supporters.
Outcome and Implications
The Islamabad High Court’s decision on the review petition is pending, and it remains to be seen whether the court will grant the revision petition and annul the Anti-Terrorism Court’s decision. The outcome of this case has significant implications for the PTI leadership and the political landscape of Pakistan.
Related Development
In a related development, a video has surfaced on YouTube showing the arrested PTI MNAs being produced in the National Assembly [[1]]. The video has sparked outrage and concern among PTI supporters and human rights activists.
Need for Greater Accountability
As the legal battle unfolds, one thing is certain – the incident has highlighted the need for greater accountability and transparency in the judicial system. TheIslamabad High Court’s decision will be closely watched, and its implications will be far-reaching for the PTI leadership and the country as a whole.
