Prosecutors noted that celebrities and influencers participated in prime advertising knowing the ads were false and risked violating the Computer Crime Act.

Prosecutors noted that celebrities and influencers participated in prime advertising knowing the ads were false and risked violating the Computer Crime Act.

The NCPO Inspector General said celebrities and influencers participated in prime advertisements which they knew were false, risked breaching the Computer Crime Act and would involve fraud. Whether the public supports it or not depends on the facts of the investigation.

Today (September 30) Mr. Kosonwat Inthuchanyong, Attorney General of the Prosecutor Rights Protection and Legal Aid and Enforcement Office (NCPO) mentioned that there is information showing that celebrities and influencers participated in the live broadcast, Ms. Kornkanok Suwannabut or Mr. Mae Tak and Kanphon Rueangaram case. Or Pa Beer, charged with a Crown Court warrant. Charged with deceiving the public – is the Computer Crime Act involved?

In this case, when the injured person reports the crime, the police will have the right to investigate in accordance with the law. The investigation must immediately investigate both the accuser and the accused to establish the truth. As for whether anyone is involved, it depends on the findings of the facts. Those involved or accused of involvement are given the opportunity to testify to the truth. Therefore, this matter needs to be investigated clearly before the facts can be said. Who is involved in the crime depends on the truth, and an investigation of the truth will lead to prosecution.

Prosecutors noted that celebrities and influencers participated in prime advertising knowing the ads were false and risked violating the Computer Crime Act.
As for the peculiarity of participating in a live broadcast, where you could be accused of participating in a crime, that is that you have to know it is fake. If you know it is fake and still live stream it to deceive, you run the risk of violating the Computer Crime Act, but there are also situations where you know it is fake but do not benefit from the transaction at all. Probably made a mistake on some of the charges and did not engage in fraud as there was nothing to gain. But there may be support. Depends on the investigation The defendant still has the opportunity to prove himself in the police investigation. Prosecutor’s Court or even when being sued, go to court and prove it. Here, the truth must be ascertained during the investigation stage to determine whether the person is involved in the crime of defrauding the public or his supporters. It can be seen from the past that there have been sharing cases where high-profile artists participated in advertisements and ended up in court.

Leave a Replay