WASHINGTON (EFE).— The special prosecutor in charge of the investigation into Donald Trump in the Capitol assault case filed a new indictment against the former U.S. president yesterday, toning down the allegations to conform to the Supreme Court’s ruling on the immunity of his actions as president.
Jack Smith maintains the four charges against him, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, but limits some allegations about his plans for electoral subversion.
According to statements from the special prosecutor’s office cited by CNN, this new indictment, presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in the case, reflects the government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s ruling.
On July 1, the highest US court granted the now ex-president partial immunity.
By a vote of six to three, the progressive judges concluded that “a former president has the right to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority,” but established that “there is no immunity for unofficial acts.”
Full immunity during the Republican’s time in the White House (2017-2021) would have ended the case against him in Washington, but that more ambiguous ruling forced lower courts to determine more precisely which acts could be considered official and which could not.
Smith filed the new complaint with the District Court of Columbia.
At a glance
“Ridiculous” accusation
Donald Trump has called the new accusation against him ridiculous and said it should be dismissed.
“Witch hunt”
He considered on his Truth Social network that the special prosecutor, the “deranged” Jack Smith, filed this “ridiculous” accusation “in an effort to resurrect a dead witch hunt in Washington…”
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
#attempt #prosecutor #Donald #Trump
2024-09-07 21:29:04
Trump’s Immunity and the Ongoing Election Case: Understanding the Latest Developments
In the ongoing election case involving former President Donald Trump, there have been significant developments in recent weeks. The US Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s immunity, followed by a new indictment filed by special prosecutor Jack Smith, has sparked intense debate and speculation about the future of the case.
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Immunity
On July 1, the US Supreme Court ruled that Trump has broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his constitutional authority as president [[1]]. In a sharply worded dissent, the Court’s progressive judges concluded that a former president has the right to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority, but established that there is no immunity for unofficial acts.
The Implications of the Ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling has far-reaching implications for the election case against Trump. While full immunity during his time in the White House (2017-2021) would have ended the case against him in Washington, the more ambiguous ruling has forced lower courts to determine more precisely which acts can be considered official and which cannot.
The New Indictment
In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, special prosecutor Jack Smith filed a new indictment against Trump, toning down the allegations to conform to the court’s decision [[2]]. The new indictment maintains the four charges against Trump, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, but limits some allegations about his plans for electoral subversion.
The Ongoing Legal Battle
The legal battle is far from over, with lawyers for the government’s special counsel and Trump set to clash in court over how the election case should proceed [[2]]. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has already issued an order mostly siding with a timeline proposed by special counsel Jack Smith, indicating that the case is likely to move forward in the coming weeks [[3]].
What’s Next?
As the election case continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the Supreme Court’s ruling on immunity will impact the outcome. One thing is certain, however: the ongoing legal battle will continue to be closely watched and debated in the coming weeks and months.
the Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s immunity has added a new layer of complexity to the ongoing election case. As the legal battle continues to unfold, it’s essential to stay informed about the latest developments and their implications for the case and the broader political landscape.
Supreme Court decisions today
Trump’s Immunity and the Ongoing Election Case: Understanding the Latest Developments
In the ongoing election case involving former President Donald Trump, there have been significant developments in recent weeks. The US Supreme Court’s ruling on Trump’s immunity, followed by a new indictment filed by special prosecutor Jack Smith, has sparked intense debate and speculation about the future of the case.
The Supreme Court’s Ruling on Immunity
On July 1, the US Supreme Court ruled that Trump has broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken within his constitutional authority as president [[1]]. In a sharply worded dissent, the Court’s progressive judges concluded that a former president has the right to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his constitutional authority, but established that there is no immunity for unofficial acts.
The Implications of the Ruling
The Supreme Court’s ruling has far-reaching implications for the election case against Trump. While full immunity during his time in the White House (2017-2021) would have ended the case against him in Washington, the more ambiguous ruling has forced lower courts to determine more precisely which acts can be considered official and which cannot.
The New Indictment
In response to the Supreme Court’s ruling, special prosecutor Jack Smith filed a new indictment against Trump, toning down the allegations to conform to the court’s decision [[2]]. The new indictment maintains the four charges against Trump, including conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, but limits some allegations about his plans for electoral subversion.
The Ongoing Legal Battle
The legal battle is far from over, with lawyers for the government’s special counsel and Trump set to clash in court over how the election case
