Preventive Works: Xie Weijun’s Response to Removing ‘Sensitive’ Content

Preventive Works: Xie Weijun’s Response to Removing ‘Sensitive’ Content

2024-04-22 09:21:34

Asked if he was ‘shocked’ following page removed ‘sensitive’ content Xie Weijun: Preventive works only

[Cetarticleareçumédias indépendants Réimpression autorisée]

[Rapport d’un média indépendant]Legislative Council member Tse Wai-jun earlier closed his social media page to review and remove “sensitive” content last Saturday.Reopen concurrent declarationAll critiques are intended to raise questions and improve opinions, or to advocate for policy formulation through legal channels. Tse Wai-jun was interviewed this morning by Commercial Channel’s “Start on a Sunny Day.” The host Chen Zhiyun asked him: “Are you surprised? What are you surprised by? What do you think you would do?” Jun said: “Actually, you can’t use surprise. “Word”, as a lawyer, every time there is a new law, he will check if the things done by individuals, companies and institutions will have an impact: “The prevention work is easy to understand .

“Sai Wan Chee Tsai” was criticized by Li Jiachao for inciting conflicts. The page was removed from shelves four days following Article 23 was promulgated.

Tse Wai Chun, formerly considered “Sai Wan Qi Zi”,Questions asked to Chief Executive Li Ka-chiu during the Legislative Council question and answer session on January 25 this yearquestioning the recent “tightness” in warehouses, law enforcement “celebrates” day and night, like copies of cards, plainclothes police arresting citizens who do not respect the rules when crossing the road, imposing heavy fines to restaurants for blocking streets, or waging 24-hour “wheel wars” once morest bookstores and canteens in industrial buildings. High-pressure law enforcement behavior.

Tse Wai-jun also believes that the government’s style of governance is “pro-Xiaohongshu, which has no account to pay taxes, far from the Hong Kong people who actually pay their taxes.” The atmosphere of conflict between the government and the people has made the society tense and “. It is difficult to participate in big events. In addition, those responsible explain that they are wrong but place the blame on the population. Regarding the garbage tax, he asked the authorities if they would revise the policy of high pressure accused of excessive fines and fines. money grabbing. In response, Li Jiachao emphasized that he opposed provoking conflicts and reprimanded the other side’s use of words that reminded him of the “soft confrontation” and “reactionary forces” of the “black violence” in 2019.

Xie Weijun, himself a lawyer, closed his Facebook page four days following the order on maintaining national security was published and took effect, and re-listed it the day before yesterday. He also stated that the content was intended for a working file only. conservation and reference, and that all criticism was aimed at raising questions and improving the situation, or through legal channels to induce the central government or the SAR to formulate policies.

Chen Zhiyun asked: Are you surprised?Tse Wai-jun stresses that MPs must be critical

On the show, when asked if this decision was related to the question-and-answer session, Tse Wai-jun replied, “Actually, it’s not.” »The roles and identities of the two are different. “Some of these may require dominant thinking. ” and the responsibility of MPs is to be critical, simply doing what legislators should do: “In the words of the Chief Executive, we are a red team. If everyone speaks in the same direction, the government will be in danger. “

Speaking regarding the content of the disclaimer, Xie Weijun admitted that he “does it for the sake of doing it”: “It’s better than not doing it, because sometimes some people… have feel like certain posts are what they like, and it’s actually tiring to post them everywhere. Kissing makes you tired of your loved ones.

A review of the page’s posts over the years alleging crimes has nothing to do with their background.

As for the impact of the Article 23 legislation on Hong Kong citizens, Tse Wai-jun said the vast majority of citizens would not commit treason, secession or divulging state secrets. However, he did not rule out the possibility that some citizens are more so. likely to “commit crimes without feeling guilty” on social platforms: “In the past, social media interfaces were relatively loose, so that recordings left behind were neither cleaned nor deleted. » He also gave the example of a student studying in Japan. earlier, suspected of having published seditious intentions on social networks. These words reminded the audience to be careful: “These young friends can be impulsive and it is particularly easy to leave a few words behind. They’ve done bad things in the past, but they don’t know that following Section 23 legislation, it might actually become a more serious crime.

On the show, Xie Weijun also revealed that his assistant reviewed the page’s posts over the years, 24 hours a day. The host asked, “Xie Weijun! Is it illegal to post something? Do you have to inspect it once? » Xie Weijun said, “Even if there is unauthorized construction in the capital. After the unauthorized construction incident, if everyone does not inspect their houses. Whether the business is illegal or not, you are arrested. In the past, some high-ranking officials may have driven drunk, and so on, they all broke the law. to do with their journey. »

To prevent the radicals from “taking hold of the text and carrying out an autopsy”, claiming to help the police return

Xie Weijun said that everyone has a responsibility to review their current and past persistent behaviors: “If it is necessary to reduce the risk, because there are always new cases emerging. The host paid attention: “You all need it.” “There are so many people in need.” Xie Weijun reiterated that the original intention of this approach was to prevent people with different political views, especially radicals, from “taking the content for autopsy”: “Then (hand it over) to the National Security Bureau , (ask) Anyway, I broke the law and caused a lot of embarrassment. If I help myself, I will also help law enforcement.

The host asked Xie Weijun if this move would cause problems and called the Article 23 legislation a scourge. Xie Weijun said: “There is nothing to worry regarding. » Everyone should have their legal responsibilities: “For example, IKEA does not allow the use of plastic knives and forks. Are we going to put too many plastic knives and forks in the store and among our colleagues? won’t we notice it? If we are deported, we are breaking the law. I think every citizen should have this responsibility.

Tse Wai-jun finally said: “I think I am one of the few pro-establishment factions, and sometimes I have voices that the government does not listen to. Or maybe I’m even the only one. in the Legislative Council. Every time there is an exemption, there is criticism that I am more careful when I speak.”

1713790906
#asked #shocked #removing #sensitive #content #page #Xie #Weijun #preventive #work

Share:

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Articles:

Table of Contents