2024-08-17 03:01:00
Last Tuesday, within the framework of the insult complaint I filed against Javier Mire, which was pending before the Second Federal Court of Criminal and Correctional Services, before Judge Sebastian Ramos and Secretary Es Turban Murano, the president’s defender who raised the exception to the lack of action, basically tried to explain that he was taking advantage of free speech and that the word “encapsulation” did not mean saying or not saying something in exchange for money, But it means from the country… (sic).
With such an explanation, all state providers, including judges, would be “under siege.” This argument of Milley’s attorney does not withstand any serious analysis. Likewise, regarding the use of the word “ensobrado”, the President received another similar complaint from journalist Jorge Lanata, whose lawyers were Elba Marcovecchio and Patricio Cabares.
To Millay’s lawyers, “package” does not mean saying or not saying something in exchange for money…
Dictators don’t like this
The practice of professional and critical journalism is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That’s why it bothers those who think they have the truth.
Javier Milei’s extraordinary use of free speech in a lengthy tweet on Friday titled “‘Journalists’ are on fire,” the full text of which appears at the end of this column, echoed by his lawyers The arguments at the hearing coincided with each other. Regarding free speech, the Constitution provides for no prior censorship, but we are all (if applicable) held judicially accountable for the consequences of our speech.
Javier Millay’s defense lawyer is Francisco Oneto, a former candidate for deputy governor of the province of Buenos Aires in 2023, running on behalf of La Libertad Avanza. His clients include those convicted of the gang murder of student Ba Convicted rugby player Maximo Thomson Generación Zoe former leader Leonardo Cositorto was arrested in the Dominican Republic in April 2022 on charges of He is suspected of a Ponzi scheme and fraud and illegal association crimes related to his company. Cositotto announced a donation to the La Libertad Avanza movement and asked Javier Millay to pardon him.
Francisco Oneto, Javier Millay’s defense attorney, declared that “his remarks constituted the broadest exercise of freedom of expression and could not be subject to censorship, let alone criminal censure for expressing them.” (… ) “For journalists who are bloated and live outside the agenda (he thinks), this is exactly what it means. Our client refers to the guidelines given by official entities as “about” without doing anything to Fontevecchia’s honor hint.
My attorney, Dr. Fernando A. Bosch Fragueiro, responded that Milei’s remarks “clearly meet the type requirements set out in Article 110 of the Criminal Code, as they constitute objectively insulting public statements that are highly offensive and dishonorable” ”. Damage Fontevchia’s reputation by making clearly derogatory and derisive accusations against him. (…) On the other hand, it cannot be ignored that Jorge Fontevchia explicitly asked the President of the country to endorse the authenticity of his remarks in order to confirm the facts stated in Chapter 3, Section a) of the document. Action reinforces the unacceptability of inaction.
There is a contradiction in terms of Javier Milei’s assertion of unrestricted free speech and his lawyer’s belief that judicial action should not be taken, given that the president himself, while still a candidate in 2022, sued someone from Five journalists from different media: Pablo Duggan, Fabián Doman, Débora Plager, Paulo Vilouta and Martin · Martín Candalaft, the first of whom came from C5N and the remaining four from American television, when they linked the “aesthetic superiority” of liberals to Nazism, a lawsuit that ended with a year’s apology In the end, the defendant’s explanation was accepted by Mire. It’s worth remembering that Jorge Lanata said he would also stop the lawsuit if Millay apologized for calling him duplicitous.
…but get funding from the state (sic). Therefore, all state providers and even judges are “surrounded”
It is also worth remembering that John Stuart Mill, the father of liberalism, wrote in On Liberty: “The most serious offense is to denounce as bad and immoral those who hold contrary opinions. People. (…) Any petition that shows malice, evil, fanaticism or intolerance must be condemned, regardless of the part on which its arguments are based.
Today, August 17, it is worth asking what the liberator José de San Martín would think of our president’s concept of freedom.
“‘Reporters’ are popular”*
The events unfolding in our country are exposing much of the underground garbage that is sinking us. While the chorus of voices from journalists about the role of social networks is not new, these days have given us a clearer view of the totalitarian side of many of them.
The network crying about losing their microphone monopoly is a classic. In this sense, they cry because they have lost the power to lie, slander, insult, slander and even blackmail without paying a price. Today, the Internet provides access to information, allows verification of what is stated, and provides instant archiving. Obviously, there is no doubt that the dirtier the reporter, the darker his past, the greater his hatred of social networks.
However, some behaviors always surprise people. It’s almost an irony of life that those who actively care for someone who has ruined so many people’s lives are crying from the rooftops, more vulnerable than glass in the face of online criticism and self-pain. Deep down, they’re great for fucking, but extremely difficult to replicate. They are very harsh and ruthless when they act as judges, and they are crybabies when they have to take a moment to face some of the barbaric behavior they themselves inflict on others. Deep down, they don’t like having just a little bit of their own medicine.
What’s more, I never expected to see them so against free speech and cry censorship every time they are criticized for showing the fact that they are liars. In this sense, the views expressed about Network X are a good example. The most wonderful thing that @elonmusk has brought to us is the complete freedom to use social networks, when the woke censorship of the old days ruled and if a comment was not on the line, it would be reported and could even mean losing an account. Therefore, it is clear that he was freed. So the craziest thing is that there are people who are simultaneously denying statements that have to do with these hypocritical frauds. Deep down, for them, freedom is the ability to speak freely without verification, even to lie, slander, insult and slander without paying any price, and if you don’t think like them, they will shut you down. Mouth.
Journalists, you have chosen the noble duty of reporting. You know if you lie it’s wrong and as much as you like to have control don’t complain if people tell the truth and want control. Is it too much to ask them to tell the truth? Why do those who expose fake journalists, liars, and operators remain silent? Is there anything wrong with freedom where everyone can express their opinion with complete freedom like you? Ultimately, the best thing about freedom is that competition will marginalize those who don’t provide quality service and elevate honest professionals.
Free speech belongs to everyone, not just journalists.
Long live damn freedom…!!!
* Javier Millay
1723865622
#Journalists #fire #Milley
