The person in charge of the Pentagon’s investigation of unidentified aerial intrusions recently co-authored an academic paper with scholars from Harvard University, proposing a set of “outside this world” theories for these currently unexplainable phenomena, and believes that these unidentified objects are actually A probe ship sent by an alien “mothership” to explore the earth.
The political news website “Politico” reported on the 14th that Sean Kirkpatrick, director of the Pentagon’s “All-Area Anomaly Analysis Office (AARO)” and Harvard University professor Avi Loeb, discussed in this March In the draft of the paper on the 7th, the above theory was put forward. While officials in the past have not ruled out the possibility of extraterrestrial life when asked regarding these unidentified objects, it is unusual for government officials, especially those involved in gathering intelligence regarding events, to discuss such a possibility.
More than half of the five-page paper is devoted to the possibility that UFOs in the U.S. military’s research are alien mothership “probes.” The paper explained that “Oumuamua”, the first interstellar object in the solar system discovered in 2017, “may be a mothership that released many small probes during the close pass of the earth”, and these probes were like “dandelion seeds”. It can be separated from the mothership by the gravity of the sun, and can be “charged” by starlight, using the water on the earth as fuel.
The paper also explores the physics of how a probe travels through Earth’s atmosphere to the surface, and speculates on the motivations of aliens sending probes to Earth for exploration.
The authors acknowledge that they cannot be sure that there are alien ships operating in the vicinity of Earth, but Rob is personally funding the Galileo Project to investigate this possibility.
Experts say Kirkpatrick’s alleged participation in the academic paper shows the Pentagon’s openness to scientific debate regarding the origin of UFOs, an important signal to the academic community, but as the “mothership” theory remains Considered highly unsubstantiated by much of the academic community, his doing so also raises questions regarding AARO’s credibility.
“It does look like (the Ministry of Defense is) supporting some of what, until now, has been considered A wild idea with no basis in fact.” The U.S. Department of Defense did not respond to requests for comment. Free Times 0415
