Pedro Castillo: Patricia Chirinos constitutionally denounces the president for curfew last Tuesday, April 5 RMMN Congress | POLITICS

the congresswoman (Avanza País) filed a new constitutional complaint once morest the President of the Republic, this time for approving a curfew in Lima and Callao last Tuesday, April 5.

LOOK: Waldemar Cerrón on early general elections: “Let those who don’t want to work go”

According to the document, with this decision, Castle Lumps failed to comply with its duty to respect the rule of law and the Constitution, as established by the Constitutional Court (TC).

It also points out that the president adopted “disproportionate measures” that they finished “Affecting fundamental rights, protected by the dichotomy regarding which principle should prevail, that of authority or that of freedom”.

LOOK: Aníbal Torres rules out having resigned from the PCM: “The Cabinet is very solid”

Chirinos also questioned that the repeal of Supreme Decree 034-2022-PCM, which remained in force throughout April 5, was never published. “Preventing the freedom of movement and assembly of the population and the exercise of their fundamental rights”.

“Finally, it is necessary to take into account that this totally arbitrary, discretionary and disproportionate measure is aggravated by the fact that, to date, the motivation for it has not been made public”he expressed.

LOOK: Acción Popular collects signatures to present an interpellation motion once morest Aníbal Torres

“This acquires special relevance in this situation, since when the State intends to limit the freedom of citizens, the decision must be properly motivated and substantiated, that is, provide a clear and reasonable explanation”he added.

In the same way, the complaint assures that the alarms of looting and massive disturbances in the city of Lima -which according to the version of the head of state justified the measure- turned out to be “psychosocial incited by fake news.

Patricia Chirinos also questioned peter castle for the six deaths left by the strike of carriers, for which he accused him of violating fundamental rights, the duty to be at the service of the nation and the primary duties of the State.

Finally, the legislator also denounced Castle Lumps for violating his prerogative as President of the Republic and the prerogative to declare a state of emergency, for which he requested his dismissal and disqualification from holding public office for 10 years.

Leave a Replay