The United Nations has announced that the warring parties in war-torn Libya have agreed to a permanent ceasefire and signed the agreement in a ceremony.
According to the World News Agency, a permanent ceasefire agreement has been reached in Geneva between the UN-backed government and the opposition armed forces in Libya, which will ensure the implementation of a ceasefire in every area of Libya.
The United Nations Mission in Libya confirmed the agreement on a permanent ceasefire on social networking sites Facebook, stating that the UN-brokered ceasefire agreement has been signed, which is a historic achievement.
Under the agreement, all foreign fighters in Libya will leave their respective countries within three months, while prisoner exchanges between the parties will be completed on a priority basis.
As a result of negotiations with UN Ambassador Stephen Turco Valium, five military commanders of the internationally recognized government of Libya and the rebel leader General Khalifa Haftar arrived in Geneva and an agreement was reached between the parties.
It should be noted that Muammar Gaddafi, who ruled Libya without participation for 42 years, was brutally killed by the rebels in October 2011, after which a UN-backed government was formed, but peace has not been established in Libya. It was possible and thousands of lives were lost during the war.
#Parties #wartorn #Libya #agree #permanent #ceasefire
**Interview with Dr. Sarah Mahmoud, Middle East Analyst**
**Interviewer**: Dr. Mahmoud, thank you for joining us today. The recent announcement of a permanent ceasefire in Libya has sparked hope for many. What are your thoughts on the significance of this agreement?
**Dr. Mahmoud**: Thank you for having me. This ceasefire agreement is indeed a historic moment for Libya. It marks the first substantial step towards ending nearly a decade of conflict since the fall of Gaddafi. However, while the agreement is promising, the real challenge lies in its implementation. Trust between the parties has been deeply eroded, and maintaining a lasting peace will require not only the withdrawal of foreign fighters but also a commitment to political reconciliation.
**Interviewer**: You mentioned the trust factor. How can the international community contribute to rebuilding trust among the warring parties?
**Dr. Mahmoud**: International validation and support are crucial. The UN’s role as a mediator in this process needs to be bolstered by a broader international coalition that emphasizes not just reconciliation, but also economic support and infrastructure rebuilding. Clear timelines and consequences for non-compliance should also be established to ensure accountability.
**Interviewer**: With the agreement calling for the withdrawal of foreign fighters, do you think this is feasible within the proposed timeframe of three months?
**Dr. Mahmoud**: It’s a tall order. Many foreign fighters have entrenched interests in Libya, and expelling them will require effective coordination and pressure from both the Libyan parties and the international community. Without a strong enforcement mechanism, the deadline could easily be missed.
**Interviewer**: This brings us to a critical point: do you believe that the ceasefire can lead to genuine peace, or is it merely a pause in the conflict?
**Dr. Mahmoud**: That’s the million-dollar question. A ceasefire without a political resolution is often just a breathing space. For lasting peace, there needs to be a concerted effort to address the root causes of the conflict—not just the symptoms. This could involve extensive dialogue among various local factions, addressing grievances, and establishing a new inclusive governance structure.
**Interviewer**: Thank you, Dr. Mahmoud. As we wrap up, what do you think readers should consider when reflecting on this ceasefire agreement?
**Dr. Mahmoud**: I encourage readers to think critically about the long-term implications of this ceasefire. Will it genuinely foster a political settlement, or could it be a temporary reprieve? Engaging in this discussion could shed light on the complexities of foreign intervention, national sovereignty, and the prospects for democratic governance in post-conflict states like Libya.
**Question for Debate**: Given the structural and historical complexities in Libya, do you believe the recent ceasefire is a genuine path to peace, or just a temporary measure? What are your thoughts on the viability of external intervention in facilitating lasting stability?
