The Khon Kaen Provincial Court sentenced “Ae-Parina” to 16 months in prison, suspended for two years, fined 80,000 baht, and paid 100,000 baht in compensation for insulting “Head Teacher”, the leader of the Khon Kaen clan.
On November 30, 2022 at 9:30 a.m., reporters reported that Khon Kaen Provincial Court Made an appointment to read the verdict of the Black Case No. 998/63 between the plaintiff, Mr. Atthaphon Buapat or the head teacher, the leader of the Khon Kaen group, together with Ms. Parina Kraikup, a former MP for Ratchaburi. Palang Pracharat Party for defamation through From the fact that Ms. Parena posted a picture while reporting the complaint at Photharam police station, Ratchaburi province, along with a message on Facebook that Today, come to prosecute the head teacher or Mr. Atthaphon Buapat, incitement, sedition and vendetta once morest the King according to section 112, along with hashtags. #Do not cancel 112 #Malicious murder is illegal. Since November 23, Ms. Parina traveled with Mr. Sira Jenjaka, a former MP for Bangkok, People’s Power Party and a lawyer as soon as she arrived to report. wasp court Immediately at the courtroom 3, while the plaintiff had only a lawyer coming to listen to the court’s verdict.
by Khon Kaen Provincial Court It took regarding an hour to read the verdict before the defendant’s lawyer took Ms. Pareena and Mr. Sira return immediately Without giving any interviews to the press, while Mr. Sira only said that he had come to support Ms. Pareena.
On the side of Mr. Atthaphon Buapat or the head teacher, the leader of the Khon Kaen group, together said that the Khon Kaen court had a verdict. On charges of defamation with two counts of because Ms. Pareena posted messages twice, she was sentenced to imprisonment for 8 months per count, guilty twice, totaling 16 months, with a suspension of imprisonment of 2 years and an order. Fine 80,000 baht, pay compensation 100,000 baht and interest, pay court fees and attorney fees 20,000 baht, and order to post apology notices in 2 daily newspapers for 3 consecutive days.
according to the process of fighting in court Which as being done, I wish it was the right that I should have. Which, if actually appealing, asks the court to consider the matter of publishing in the newspaper for longer. Because I was being treated, it caused a great disgrace to my reputation, “said Mr. Auttapol.
