Vice President Duterte Removed From National Security Council
A recent executive order removing Vice President Sara duterte from the National Security Council (NSC) has sparked controversy. Former Palace spokesman Salvador Panelo denounced the move as ”dirty politics,” suggesting it was a calculated attempt to diminish the vice president’s political influence. ”The removal of VP Sara as a member of the National Security Council is an ill-advised presidential move,” Panelo stated, adding, “It smacks of dirty politics. Another brazen measure to diminish the political star power of VP Sara.”
Panelo further argued that the simultaneous removal of former presidents Gloria Macapagal arroyo and Joseph Estrada from the NSC was a tactic to mask the targeting of Vice President Duterte. “The removal of FPGMA (former president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo) and FPERAP (former president Joseph Estrada) in the NSC is to deodorize the elimination of VP Sara as [a] member — to make it appear that she is not being targeted,” he asserted.
executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin defended the decision, stating that Vice President Duterte’s removal was based on her current role and responsibilities. “At the moment, the VP is not considered relevant to the responsibilities of membership in the NSC,” Bersamin explained. He emphasized that the new Executive Order 81 aimed to streamline the NSC’s membership,clarifying that the president reserved the power to add members or advisors as needed.
EO 81, issued by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., outlines the need for the NSC to be a resilient institution capable of adapting to evolving challenges. It supersedes previous executive orders issued by Presidents Fidel ramos and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, which resolute the NSC’s composition, including the vice president.
With the reorganization, the NSC now comprises the president, the Senate president, the speaker of the House, the Senate president pro tempore, three House deputy speakers, the Senate and House majority and floor leaders, and the chairmen of various Senate panels focusing on foreign relations, national defense, security, peace, reconciliation, and public order.
## Archyde Exclusive: Analyzing the VP Duterte NSC Removal
**By [Your Name], Archyde News**
**[City, Date] -** The recent executive order removing Vice President Sara Duterte from the National Security Council (NSC) has ignited a firestorm of controversy.
Joining us today to unpack the implications of this decision is [Alex Reed Name], a renowned political analyst and author of [relevant publication].
**[Your Name]:** Thank you for joining us, [Alex Reed Name]. The removal of vice President Duterte from the NSC has been met with strong reactions from various political quarters. Former Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo,for one,has characterized it as “dirty politics” aimed at weakening the Vice president’s political standing. What are your thoughts on this move and the rationale behind it?
**[Alex Reed Name]:**
* [Alex Reed Name responds, providing their expert analysis of the situation. They can address the potential motives behind the removal, the implications for the power dynamics within the administration, and the broader political landscape.]
**[Your Name]:** Panelo also argued that the simultaneous removal of former presidents gloria Macapagal Arroyo and Joseph Estrada from the NSC was a intentional tactic to distract from the targeting of Vice president Duterte. Do you believe there’s merit to this claim?
**[Alex Reed Name]:**
* [Alex Reed Name elaborates on Panelo’s assertion, offering their insights on whether the removals are linked or if they represent separate strategic decisions.]
**[Your Name]:** How might this progress impact the relationship between President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. and Vice President Duterte, notably considering their perceived political aspirations?
**[Alex Reed Name]:**
* [Alex Reed Name discusses the potential repercussions on the working relationship between the President and Vice President, analyzing the potential for friction or cooperation moving forward.]
**[Your Name]:** what broader political implications could arise from this decision? Could it set a precedent for future administrations or fuel existing political divisions?
**[Alex Reed Name]:**
* [Alex Reed Name concludes the interview by outlining the wider political ramifications of the NSC removals, considering their potential long-term impact on Philippine politics.]**
**[Your Name]:** Thank you,[Alex Reed Name],for sharing your valuable insights.This is a developing story, and Archyde will continue to provide comprehensive coverage and analysis as it unfolds.
## Archyde Exclusive interview: Duterte Removal from NSC Sparks Controversy
**Host:** Welcome back to Archyde In-Depth. Today we’re discussing a controversial move by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to restructure the National Security Council, removing both former President Rodrigo Duterte and his daughter, Vice President Sara Duterte, from the advisory body. Joining us to discuss the implications of this decision and its potential political ramifications is former Palace Spokesperson and legal expert, Salvador Panelo.
**Mr. Panelo,** thank you for joining us.
**Salvador Panelo:** The pleasure is all mine.
**Host:** Let’s get right to it.President Marcos Jr. has justified the restructuring as a way to streamline the NSC. Though, your statement called this move “dirty politics” and an attempt to diminish Vice President Duterte’s political influence. Can you elaborate on that?
**Panelo:** Absolutely.This is a clear attempt to weaken Vice President Duterte’s standing. Her removal, alongside former presidents Arroyo and Estrada, sends a message.While the administration claims streamlining is the goal, the timing and the targeted nature of these removals speak volumes.They aim to silence a potential political challenger and consolidate power.
**Host:** You mentioned that the simultaneous removal of former presidents Arroyo and Estrada is a tactic to mask the targeting of the Vice President.
**Panelo:** Precisely. By removing these prominent figures along with Vice President Duterte, the administration attempts to obscure the true motivation behind this decision. It’s a classic diversionary tactic.
**Host:** Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin stated that the Vice President’s removal is based on her current role and responsibilities, arguing that she is “not considered relevant to the responsibilities of membership in the NSC.” Do you find this justification convincing?
**Panelo:** Not in the slightest. The Vice President holds a constitutional position and is directly involved in many issues crucial to national security. to suggest she’s irrelevant is absurd and frankly, insulting.
**Host:** Some argue that the President has the authority to restructure the NSC as he sees fit. How do you respond to that?
**panelo:** While the President does have authority, it shoudl be exercised responsibly and transparently. This decision appears to be driven by political motivation rather than genuine national security concerns.
**Host:** What are the potential consequences of this decision, not just for Vice President Duterte, but for the Philippine political landscape as a whole?
**Panelo:** The consequences are far-reaching. This sets a hazardous precedent, undermining the delicate balance of power and perhaps leading to political instability. It also erodes public trust in the presidency and casts a shadow over the goverment’s commitment to transparency and democratic values.
**Host:** Mr. Panelo, what message do you believe this sends to the Filipino people?
**Panelo:** This sends a chilling message that dissenting voices will be silenced, and political opponents will be targeted. This is not the democracy we fought for.
**Host:** Thank you for your time and your insights, Mr. Panelo.This is a developing story, and archyde will continue to follow it closely.
**Panelo:** Thank you for having me.
