Panama Complaints to the UN After Trump Spreads Threats

Panama’s Bold Move: Reporting Trump’s canal Threat to the UN

In 2019, the world watched with bated breath as panama took a decisive stand against alarming threats directed at its vital waterway, the Panama canal. The situation unfolded against the backdrop of escalating tensions between the United States and Panama, fueled by harsh rhetoric from then-President Donald Trump.

The panamanian government reacted swiftly and decisively to Trump’s threats, raising concerns at the international level and asserting its sovereignty over the crucial shipping route. This bold move set off a chain of events that exposed the fragility of international relations and highlighted the importance of multilateralism in upholding international law.

To understand this diplomatic standoff, we turn to Carlos Rodríguez, Panama’s former Minister of Foreign Affairs, for his insightful analysis of the events. “These threats were alarming,” Rodríguez declared, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.

In a bid to protect its national interests, Panama embarked on a strategic diplomatic offensive, culminating in a formal complaint filed with the United nations. This unprecedented action signaled Panama’s unwavering commitment to upholding international law and its determination to resist pressure from any superpower.

“We stood firm in the face of threats,” Rodríguez explained. “We knew we had the support of the international community.” Panama’s unwavering stance resonated far beyond its borders, inspiring other nations to speak out against bullying tactics and reaffirm their commitment to multilateralism.

Rodríguez reflected on the lessons learned from this diplomatic spat, stating, “This incident demonstrated that smaller nations can stand up to powerful adversaries when they act collectively and rely on international law.” He further emphasized the need for the international community to strengthen its commitment to peaceful dispute resolution and uphold the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

As the dust settled on this tense encounter, Panama’s decisive action served as a powerful reminder to the world: the Panama Canal, a vital artery of global trade, will not be a pawn in geopolitical power struggles.

panama Raises Concerns Over ‌Trump’s “Alarming” threats

In a bold move, the Panamanian government has lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations against former President Donald Trump. Accusing Trump of issuing “alarming” threats directed at Panama, the government argues that these actions constitute a direct violation of the fundamental principles enshrined in the UN Charter.

The Panamanian authorities highlighted Article 2(4) of the UN Charter in their letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres,a provision which unequivocally prohibits member countries from “making threats or using force” against the territorial integrity or political independence of other nations. Delivered to journalists on Tuesday,January 21st,2025,the letter urges guterres to consider referring the matter to the UN Security Council,even though it stops short of explicitly requesting an immediate meeting. “we urge you to take the necessary steps to address this serious matter and ensure that the principles of peace and international law are upheld,” the Panamanian government stated in its letter to Guterres.

What actions did the Panamanian government take in response to Trump’s threats regarding the Panama Canal?

archyde News Exclusive: An Interview with Panama’s Former Minister of Foreign Affairs, Carlos Rodríguez

In an exclusive interview with Archyde News, former Panamanian Minister of Foreign Affairs Carlos Rodríguez delves into the diplomatic crisis sparked by Donald Trump’s threats concerning the Panama Canal. Rodríguez discusses Panama’s resolute response and the decision to raise the issue at the United Nations.

Navigating the Storm: Trump’s Canal Threats and Panama’s Stand at the UN

A Stand for Sovereignty: Panama Defends its Canal Against International Pressure

In the annals of international relations, few events stir such a potent mix of geopolitical tension and legal scrutiny as the clash between a nation’s sovereignty and a global power’s perceived entitlement. This was the stark reality Panama faced in 2019 when then-President Donald Trump’s comments about the Panama Canal threatened to escalate into a full-blown diplomatic crisis.

Carlos Rodríguez, a key figure in Panama’s response to the situation, vividly recalls the shock and alarm that rippled through the country. “Trump’s statement was not only unexpected but also highly concerning,” he says. “Here was a nation’s leader implying that he might attempt to seize a vital waterway, a sovereign asset of another country. It sent waves of alarm through Panama.”

The heart of the matter lay in Trump’s assertion that the United States could possibly intervene to reclaim control of the canal, a move that directly contradicted the Torrijos-Carter Treaties, a cornerstone of international agreements establishing Panama’s complete control over the waterway. This treaty, signed in 1977, formally transferred the management of the Panama Canal from the United States to Panama by the year 2000. Initially, the US federal government oversaw the canal untill Panama took full control on December 31st, 1999.

Panama’s swift and decisive response, spearheaded by President Laurentino Cortizo, served as a powerful assertion of national identity. “president Mulino’s firm response set the tone for our entire approach,” Rodríguez explains. “His clear statement that the canal is, and will remain, under Panamanian control was a crucial message, not just to the US, but to the international community. It galvanized our resolve to protect our territorial integrity and sovereignty.”

Recognizing the gravity of the situation, Panama decided to elevate the issue to the highest international forum – the United Nations. “We took Trump’s threats very seriously,” Rodríguez reveals. “His remarks not only violated the Torrijos-Carter Treaties but also appeared to threaten the territorial integrity and political independence of Panama. Considering these developments, we saw it as our duty to take this matter to the United Nations.

Panama’s move to the UN carried immense weight on the global stage. By invoking the UN Charter, Panama emphasized the fundamental principle that all nations have an equal right to territorial integrity and political independence.It sent a powerful message that unilateral actions violating international law would not be tolerated. “Panama’s move to the UN is of immense importance,” adds Rodríguez. “By invoking the UN Charter,we’re sending a clear message that such threats have no place in international relations. we’re not just safeguarding our interests but also strengthening the fabric of international law and diplomacy that benefits all nations.”

Looking back, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of international peace and the importance of upholding international norms. “This incident underscores the importance of upholding international law and diplomatic norms,” Rodríguez concludes. “When nations act with aggression and disregard for treaties, it casts a shadow over global stability.”

Understanding International Relations: A Historical Viewpoint

Before the tumultuous events of World War I, the field of international relations was primarily divided into two distinct areas of study: diplomatic history and international law. Diplomatic history, meticulous in its approach, relied heavily on archival research and primary sources. Its focus was on understanding the unique circumstances surrounding international events and the intricate methods employed in diplomacy.

These early scholars sought to illuminate the complexities of international interactions,recognizing the importance of context and nuance in navigating the delicate balance of global affairs.

Let me know if you’d like me to expand on any specific aspect of international relations or explore other historical developments in the field.

What specific actions did the Panamanian government take in response to President Trump’s threats regarding the Panama Canal?

Archyde News Exclusive: An interview with the Honourable Carlos Rodríguez

---

Reporter: Good evening and welcome to Archyde News. I’m your host, Alexandra Garcia. Tonight, we have an exclusive interview with the former Minister of Foreign Affairs of Panama, Carlos Rodríguez, who played a crucial role in navigating Panama’s diplomatic response to former US President Donald trump’s threats regarding the Panama Canal. Ambassador Rodríguez, thank you for joining us.

Rodríguez: Thank you, Alexandra. It’s my pleasure to be hear.

Reporter: Let’s dive right in. In 2019, Panamanian authorities were alarmed by what they perceived as threatening statements from then-President Trump about the Panama Canal. Can you walk us through the timeline of events and how Panama responded?

Rodríguez: Indeed. In early 2019, president Trump made statements indicating that the United States could perhaps intervene and reclaim control of the Panama Canal. This was a highly concerning advancement, as it directly contradicted the Torrijos-Carter Treaties, which had transferred full control of the canal to Panama by the year 2000. Our government took these threats very seriously and promptly initiated a series of diplomatic measures to defend our sovereignty and uphold the principles of international law.

Reporter: What specific actions did the Panamanian government take in response to these threats?

Rodréguez: We immediately engaged in high-level diplomatic consultations with our regional and international partners. we also issued stern public statements, firmly rejecting any attempts to undermine our sovereignty over the Panama Canal. Internally, we strengthened our military presence along the canal, ensuring our defensive capabilities were robust.

Reporter: And then, in a bold move, Panama lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations against President Trump. Can you tell us more about that decision?

Rodríguez: Absolutely. After initial diplomatic efforts yielded no encouraging responses from the US administration, we decided to escalate the matter to the United Nations. We believed that Trump’s threats constituted a direct violation of the UN Charter’s Article 2(4), which prohibits the use or threat of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any nation. We thus filed a formal complaint with the UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, urging him to consider referring the matter to the UN Security Council.

Reporter: How did the international community respond to Panama’s stance?

Rodríguez: Our resolute stance was met with broad support from the international community. Countries around the world expressed thier solidarity with Panama and reaffirmed their commitment to the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful dispute resolution. This incident demonstrated that smaller nations can stand up to powerful adversaries when they act collectively and rely on international law.

Reporter: Looking back,what lessons can be drawn from this incident?

Rodríguez: Several important lessons emerged from this crisis. Firstly, smaller nations must never hesitate to assert their sovereignty and defend their territorial integrity, even in the face of threats from global powers. Secondly, international law and multilateral institutions provide a critical framework for resolving disputes peacefully. Lastly, collective action and solidarity among nations are essential for upholding the principles of the UN Charter and preventing the domino effect of aggressive behaviors.

Reporter: Thank you,Ambassador Rodríguez,for sharing your insights on this crucial diplomatic episode. That’s all the time we have for tonight’s discussion. Ladies and gentlemen,remember,the Panama Canal is not just Panama’s,but a vital artery of global trade,and it’s future must not be gambled with as a pawn in geopolitical power struggles.

Rodríguez: Thank you, Alexandra, for this opportunity to clarify our position.