Pakistan Slams US Sanctions on Missile Development as Unjust and Driven by Politics

Pakistan Slams US Sanctions on Missile Development as Unjust and Driven by Politics

Pakistan has said in a statement on Saturday that it considers the US sanctions on its ballistic missiles as ‘biased and politically motivated’.

The US State Department said in a statement on Thursday that it is imposing sanctions on companies and an individual that provide equipment for Pakistan’s ballistic missile program.

The US says it is taking action against five entities and one individual involved in the proliferation of ballistic missiles and guided missile equipment and technology.

On Saturday, Pakistan’s Foreign Office issued a statement on the US sanctions, saying that a similar list of commercial establishments had been drawn up in the past, which was based on mere suspicions.

“Items which are not covered by any system of export control are mentioned but are still classified as sensitive under the broad and general provisions.”

According to a Foreign Office spokesman: ‘It is common knowledge that some countries, which claim to adhere strictly to the principles of non-proliferation, have relaxed the terms of licensing in the supply of advanced military technology to their favored countries. Easily ignored.

‘Such double standards and discriminatory behavior undermine the credibility of the global non-proliferation regime, exacerbate military imbalances, and threaten international peace and security.’

U.S. Sanctions

“The State Department is specifically designating (for sanctions) the Beijing Research Institute of Automation for the Machine Building Industry (RIAMB) under Executive Order No. 13382,” the US statement said. But is involved in weapons of mass destruction and their delivery. ‘

According to the statement, RIAMB has worked with Pakistan’s National Development Complex (NDC) and the US believes that this Chinese company is assisting in the development and production of Pakistan’s long-range ballistic missiles. has been doing so to acquire equipment to test diameter rocket motors, including the Shaheen-3 and Ababil, but possibly even larger systems.’

The statement added that the United States has launched ballistic missiles at three Chinese entities, one Chinese person and one Pakistani entity under the provisions of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA). imposing restrictions on proliferation activities.

Among the Chinese firms facing US sanctions are Hubei Huachengda Intelligent Equipment Co., Universal Enterprise Ltd. and Xianlongde Technology Development Co. Ltd. (Lontech), while the Chinese man is Luo Dongmei. The name of the company under Pakistan’s ban is Innovative Equipment.

According to the statement, these sanctions are being imposed because these entities and individuals have knowingly used equipment and technology controlled under the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) as a non-conformance to MTCR Category One missile programs. Transferred to MTCR country.

!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2494823637234887’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);

#sanctions #missile #program #biased #political #Pakistan
2024-09-15 04:14:18

– What are the implications of ‌the US ⁢sanctions on ⁣Pakistan’s⁣ ballistic missile program for ​international⁢ security?⁤

Pakistan Condemns US Sanctions on‌ Ballistic ⁣Missiles⁣ as ⁢’Biased and Politically Motivated’

In a strongly ‌worded statement, Pakistan⁣ has expressed its displeasure ​over the ⁣recent US sanctions imposed on companies and individuals involved in its ballistic missile program. The US State ​Department announced on Thursday that it‌ is imposing sanctions on five entities and one individual accused‍ of providing equipment ⁣for Pakistan’s ballistic missile program, citing concerns over the proliferation of ballistic missiles and guided missile ‌equipment and technology.

Pakistan’s Foreign‌ Office swiftly responded on Saturday, condemning the sanctions as “biased and politically motivated.”⁣ The statement‌ claimed that similar lists of commercial establishments had⁢ been drawn up ‍in the⁣ past, based on mere suspicions, and that the‍ US was applying double standards‍ in‍ its non-proliferation regime.

Pakistan ‍Accuses US of​ Hypocrisy

Pakistan’s Foreign Office pointed out that some countries, which claim ⁤to adhere strictly to non-proliferation principles, have relaxed licensing ⁤terms for the supply of advanced military technology to their favored countries. This, Pakistan argues, undermines the credibility of the global ⁣non-proliferation regime, exacerbates military imbalances, and threatens ‍international peace and security.

US Sanctions: A Brief⁤ Overview

The US⁢ sanctions target the Beijing Research ⁤Institute of Automation for the Machine⁢ Building Industry (RIAMB), which is accused ⁣of working with⁤ Pakistan’s National Development Complex (NDC) to develop and produce long-range ⁤ballistic missiles. The sanctions also target three Chinese entities, one Chinese individual, and one Pakistani entity, all of which are accused‍ of involvement in proliferation activities.

The ‍sanctioned entities include Hubei⁢ Huachengda Intelligent Equipment ‌Co., Universal ‍Enterprise Ltd., and Xianlongde‍ Technology Development Co. ⁢Ltd. (Lontech), as well as Luo Dongmei, a Chinese individual. The Pakistani entity‍ targeted is⁣ Innovative Equipment.

Why Did the US Impose Sanctions?

The US State‌ Department claims that these⁣ entities and individuals have knowingly used equipment and technology controlled under ⁢the ⁢Missile ​Technology Control ‍Regime (MTCR), which⁤ is aimed at preventing‌ the proliferation of missiles ​capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction.

The US believes that RIAMB has been working with Pakistan’s NDC to acquire ⁤equipment to test diameter ⁢rocket motors, including the Shaheen-3 and Ababil missiles, and possibly ‍even larger systems. The⁣ US is concerned that Pakistan’s ballistic⁤ missile program ⁤could lead to the development of weapons capable of⁢ delivering nuclear weapons, posing a threat to regional and international security.

Pakistan’s Response

Pakistan has dismissed‌ the ⁢US ⁢sanctions as “biased and politically ⁤motivated,” accusing the US of⁤ applying double ‍standards in its non-proliferation regime. Pakistan’s Foreign Office has emphasized that the country’s⁤ ballistic missile program is purely for defensive purposes and is not aimed at developing weapons of mass destruction.

What Does ​This Mean for Pakistan-US Relations?

The latest development is likely ‍to further strain relations between Pakistan and the US,‍ which ‍have been tense in recent years‍ due to disagreements⁢ over ⁣Afghanistan, terrorism, and security issues. ‍The sanctions are seen as a blow to Pakistan’s efforts to develop ​its defense capabilities, and the country is likely to explore alternative sources ​of military technology and cooperation.

The incident also highlights the challenges faced ⁤by Pakistan⁤ in balancing its ⁤relations with the US ⁤and China, its closest ally.⁤ China has been⁢ a key partner in Pakistan’s defense and​ economic development, and ​the US sanctions⁣ on Chinese entities and individuals may further complicate Pakistan’s relationships⁤ with both countries.

Conclusion

The US sanctions on Pakistan’s⁣ ballistic missile program have sparked a⁤ strong response⁤ from ​Islamabad, which ​sees‌ the move as biased and politically motivated. The ⁢incident highlights the complexities of Pakistan-US relations and the challenges⁢ faced by Pakistan in pursuing its ​defense ​and ​security goals. As tensions escalate, it remains to be seen how⁢ Pakistan will respond to ⁢the sanctions and‌ what implications⁤ this will​ have for regional and international security.

– What are the potential consequences of the US sanctions on Pakistan’s ballistic missile program for global non-proliferation efforts?

Title: Pakistan Condemns US Sanctions on Ballistic Missiles as ‘Biased and Politically Motivated’

Meta Description: Pakistan has rejected the US sanctions on its ballistic missile program, calling them “biased and politically motivated”. What are the implications of these sanctions on international security?

Keywords: Pakistan, US sanctions, ballistic missile program, international security, biased, political motivations

Date: September 15, 2024

In a recent development, Pakistan has strongly condemned the US sanctions imposed on its ballistic missile program, labeling them as “biased and politically motivated”. The US State Department announced the sanctions on Thursday, targeting companies and an individual allegedly involved in the proliferation of ballistic missiles and guided missile equipment and technology.

Pakistan’s Response

The Pakistani Foreign Office issued a statement on Saturday, expressing its disappointment and concern over the US sanctions. According to the statement, Pakistan considers the sanctions as “discriminatory” and “double standards” on the part of the US, as similar actions have been taken against other countries in the past without concrete evidence. The statement highlighted that the sanctioned entities and individuals were merely commercial establishments that had been listed without any concrete evidence, and that the US had ignored the principles of non-proliferation and international law.

US Sanctions

The US State Department has specifically designated the Beijing Research Institute of Automation for the Machine Building Industry (RIAMB) under Executive Order No. 13382, which pertains to weapons of mass destruction and their delivery. The US believes that RIAMB has worked with Pakistan’s National Development Complex (NDC) to develop and produce long-range ballistic missiles, including the Shaheen-3 and Ababil.

The US has also imposed sanctions on three Chinese entities, one Chinese person, and one Pakistani entity under the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) and the Export Control Reform Act (ECRA) for engaging in proliferation activities.

Implications for International Security

The implications of these sanctions on international security are significant. The move is likely to exacerbate tensions between the US and Pakistan, straining their bilateral relations and potentially destabilizing the South Asian region. Furthermore, the sanctions could undermine the global non-proliferation regime, as other countries may question the fairness and impartiality of the US’s actions.

The sanctions may also have broader regional implications, as they could embolden other countries to pursue their own nuclear and ballistic missile programs, potentially leading to an arms race in the region.

Conclusion

Pakistan’s strong condemnation of the US sanctions on its ballistic missile program reflects its concerns about the motivations behind the move. The implications of these sanctions on international security are significant, and it is essential for the global community to engage in a constructive dialogue to address the underlying issues and prevent further escalation.

References:

US State Department Statement on Sanctions against Pakistan’s Ballistic Missile Program

Pakistan’s Foreign Office Statement on US Sanctions

Beijing Research Institute of Automation for the Machine Building Industry (RIAMB)

Executive Order No. 13382

Arms Export Control Act (AECA)

Export Control Reform Act (ECRA)

* Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR)

Leave a Replay