Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ijaz Ishaq issued a written decision on the petition against preventing the lawyers of the founder PTI from entering the jail, according to which the court established a three-member local commission consisting of lawyers.
Justice Sardar Ijaz Isaac issued a written judgment stating that there is a contradiction between the statements of the jail administration and the lawyers regarding the complaints of the lawyers.
According to the written decision, it is necessary for the court to appoint its eyes and ears for an impartial review.
The written decision said that the commission will ensure the availability of a commissioner on every court date, 10 thousand rupees will be paid for each visit of the local commissioner to Kwadiala Jail.
In the case of Imran Khan not meeting the lawyers, Adiala Jail Superintendent approached the Supreme Court
According to the decision, lawyers’ vehicles will be allowed to be taken to the inner gate instead of the outer gate of the jail.
The written decision said that the discussion between the lawyers and the undertrial prisoner will be in privacy, the local commissioner can stay during the consultation, the orders will apply only to those who have submitted the letter of attorney, the 3 assistants will also be able to take them to jail, the orders will apply to all jail trial cases. However, the court disposed of the petition of the founder PTI’s lawyers with orders.
Three officers were transferred from Adiala Jail
#case #preventing #Imran #Khans #lawyers #entering #jail #3member #commission #formed #Pakistan
2024-09-09 11:47:12
Table of Contents
- 1 Here are the PAA (People Also Ask) related questions for the title: **Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s Landmark Decision: Ensuring Transparency in Imran Khan’s Jail Meetings**.
- 2 How does Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s decision to appoint a three-member local commission impact the transparency of legal proceedings for Imran Khan?
Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s Landmark Decision: Ensuring Transparency in Imran Khan’s Jail Meetings
In a significant development, Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq has issued a written decision on a petition regarding the prevention of lawyers of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan from entering Adiala Jail. The decision has far-reaching implications for ensuring transparency and fairness in the proceedings.
Background of the Case
The petition was filed after allegations surfaced that lawyers of Imran Khan were being prevented from meeting their client in Adiala Jail. The Islamabad High Court took cognizance of the matter and decided to investigate the claims.
Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s Written Decision
In his written judgment, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq observed that there was a contradiction between the statements of the jail administration and the lawyers regarding the complaints made by the lawyers. To ensure an impartial review of the matter, the court deemed it necessary to appoint its “eyes and ears” in the form of a three-member local commission consisting of lawyers.
Terms of the Commission
According to the written decision, the commission will ensure the availability of a commissioner on every court date. Additionally, a sum of 10,000 rupees will be paid for each visit of the local commissioner to Adiala Jail. This move is aimed at guaranteeing transparency and accountability in the proceedings.
Other Key Decisions
In another significant development, the court has allowed lawyers’ vehicles to be taken to the inner gate of the jail instead of the outer gate. This decision is expected to facilitate easier access for lawyers to meet their clients in the jail.
Context: Imran Khan’s Case and the Islamabad High Court
Imran Khan, the founder of PTI, has been facing various legal challenges in recent times. In a related development, Adiala Jail Superintendent had approached the Supreme Court in the case of Imran Khan not meeting his lawyers.
It is noteworthy that Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq is a respected jurist who was appointed as an Additional Judge of the Islamabad High Court on December 17, 2021 [3]. He is also one of the six judges who had alleged interference by intelligence agencies in judicial matters in March 2024 [2].
Conclusion
Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s written decision is a significant step towards ensuring transparency and fairness in the proceedings related to Imran Khan’s jail meetings. The establishment of a three-member local commission consisting of lawyers and the terms of the commission are expected to guarantee a thorough and impartial review of the matter. This decision highlights the importance of an independent judiciary in upholding the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens.
SEO Keywords: Islamabad High Court, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq, Imran Khan, Adiala Jail, Lawyers, Transparency, Fairness, Judicial Matters, Intelligence Agencies, PTI Founder.
How does Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s decision to appoint a three-member local commission impact the transparency of legal proceedings for Imran Khan?
Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s Landmark Decision: Ensuring Transparency in Imran Khan’s Jail Meetings
In a significant development, Islamabad High Court Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq has issued a written decision on a petition regarding the prevention of lawyers of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan from entering Adiala Jail. The decision has far-reaching implications for ensuring transparency and fairness in the proceedings.
Background of the Case
The petition was filed after allegations surfaced that lawyers of Imran Khan were being prevented from meeting their client in Adiala Jail. The Islamabad High Court took cognizance of the matter and decided to investigate the claims.
Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq’s Written Decision
In his written judgment, Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq observed that there was a contradiction between the statements of the jail administration and the lawyers regarding the complaints made by the lawyers. To ensure an impartial review of the matter, the court deemed it necessary to appoint its “eyes and ears” in the form of a three-member local commission consisting of lawyers.
Terms of the Commission
According to the written decision, the commission will ensure the availability of a commissioner on every court date. Additionally, a sum of 10,000 rupees will be paid for each visit of the local commissioner to Adiala Jail. This move is aimed at guaranteeing transparency and accountability in the proceedings.
Other Key Decisions
In another significant development, the court has allowed lawyers’ vehicles to be taken to the inner gate of the jail instead of the outer gate. This decision is expected to facilitate easier access for lawyers to meet their clients in the jail.
Context: Imran Khan’s Case and the Islamabad High Court
Imran Khan, the founder of PTI, has been facing various legal challenges in recent times. In a related development, Adiala Jail Superintendent had
