Pablo Echarri was denounced for inciting violence after his statements about Cristina Kirchner

Paul Echarri reported Wednesday night on his Twitter account that He was denounced for “inciting violence” together with relevant personalities of the ruling party, such as Alberto Fernandez, Andrew “The Crow” Larroque, James Cafiero, Edward “Wado” Of Peter and Hebe De Bonafini.

“Good evening, bon appetit”wrote the actor and open Kirchnerist militant next to the image that shows the system for consulting the cause of the Judiciary, where the main data of the complaint can be accessed.

Though at the moment it is unknown who promoted the complaint and the arguments that support it, it is known that it was presented yesterday before the Justice, in the Federal Criminal and Correctional Court 10, where the officials mentioned above are accused of “abuse of authority and violation of the duties of a public official”; and to the actor of the crimes of “incitement to collective violence” and “other attacks once morest public order.”

Echarri joined on Monday at Kirchnerist voices that denounced “Lawfare” and “proscription”on the day that prosecutors Diego Luciani and Sergio Mola finished their argument once morest Cristina Kirchner in the cause National Highway. If they touch Cristina, what a mess is going to be made…”, he wrote in Twitter.

Hours later, upon meeting that they asked 12 years in prison and disqualification life to hold public office For the vice president, the actor used the same social network once more to go out and repudiate the judicial situation that the leader of Kirchnerism is going through. and to demonstrate, once once more, his unconditional support for her.

“The only conservative thought has a problem that is difficult to solve: it hates so much that it persecutes ‘whatever it takes’, it tries to silence, proscribe, extinguish to the political opponent. The shot always backfires. Always”, reflected.

The actor’s words generated controversy in the social network and, once once more, the polarity of opinions regarding this case and the judicial process became evident.

Leave a Replay