Voting for second and fourth place on the Storting list for the Oslo Labor Party was due when the county team gathered for a nomination meeting in the traditional Samfunnssalen in Oslo on Tuesday evening. The members of the nomination committee have not agreed among themselves on who should have the safe second place, as well as the fourth place on the list.
– We have not succeeded, admitted election committee leader Rina Mariann Hansen after explaining the considerable efforts the committee has made through many and long meetings to arrive at a unanimous recommendation for the Storting list.
The majority of the committee nominates Hadia Tajik for the safe second place on the nomination list. The minority wants Kamzy Gunaratnam. If Ap’s support remains at its current level at the election next year, the party is likely to get only three representatives from Oslo in the Storting.
– We have a small group of politicians in Norway who can face Sylvi Listhaug and Erna Solberg in a debate and come out victorious. Hadia is one of them, said Hansen.
– On the whistleblower’s side
Hansen also pointed out that “there were few who stood as straight-backed” on the side of whistleblowers as Hadia Tajik when the metoo dispute ravaged the party. The then deputy leader of the Labor Party, Trond Giske, resigned in 2018 after several women reported him.
The party leadership concluded that Giske had broken the party’s guidelines against sexual harassment. Giske has contested this and also several of the notifications, but has also apologized for his behaviour.
Gunaratnam has the second place on today’s list and is nominated for the same place by the minority – consisting of one of nine members – on the committee.
– Who will take the fight for Oslo? The Oslo list is traditionally characterized by national politicians. Kamzy grew up in Groruddalen, is a popular Oslo politician, former deputy mayor and leader of Oslo AUF, said Laial Janet Ayoub.
Party leader Jonas Gahr Støre is, by all accounts, beaten into first place, and so is deputy leader Jan Christian Vestre in third place.
Completely even
Until recently, there was a dead heat between Tajik and Gunaratnam, according to him VG. Each of them received support from 105 delegates, the count the newspaper had carried out showed.
Gunaratnam is said to have led quite clearly earlier this autumn, with the support of more than twice as many delegates as Tajik. But Tajik is said to have taken the lead in recent weeks, the newspaper wrote.
As it is competitive voting, voting must be done in writing. It will make it easier for the delegates to break with their local team and vote according to their own convictions. The counting and mapping of how the local teams are positioned is therefore fraught with uncertainty.
If there is a deadlock, there will be a new written vote. If it also ends in a tie, the nomination will be decided by drawing lots, the rules of procedure state.
National versus local
Tajik’s supporters have highlighted the difficult position she has had in the Labor Party as both deputy leader and minister and the implementation power she has to show time.
Gunaratnam’s supporters have been skeptical that there is a lack of local political voice if only candidates who are widely perceived as national politicians are elected. Some also have opposite The daily newspaper expressed skepticism that Tajik is “shopping counties” after she reported moving from Rogaland to Oslo.
In addition to the battle for second place, there are also two battles for fourth place.
Here, Agnes Nærland Viljugrein has the support of a majority in the nomination committee, while the minority wanted Trine Lise Sundnes.
Frode Jacobsen is set for fifth place on the list.
#Ready #battle #parliamentary #seats #Oslo #Labor #Party
What are the main arguments being made for and against Hadia Tajik’s candidacy for the Oslo Labor Party Storting list?
## Heated Race for Oslo Labor Party Nomination
**Interviewer:** Welcome to the show. Joining us today is political analyst, [Guest Name].
**Guest:** Thanks for having me.
**Interviewer:** Let’s dive right into the news from Oslo. The Labor party is having a tough time agreeing on their Storting list, specifically the second and fourth positions. What’s behind this deadlock?
**Guest:** The Oslo Labor Party is facing a tough choice between two strong candidates: Hadia Tajik, a well-known national figure, and Kamzy Gunaratnam, a popular local politician with strong roots in Oslo. The committee seems evenly split, with strong arguments for both.
**Interviewer:** What are the main arguments for each candidate?
**Guest:** _[Guest Name] explains the arguments for Tajik (national experience, ability to debate strong opponents) and Gunaratnam (local popularity, grassroots appeal)]_ You can see [Guest Name] looking at the provided source, (presumably counting how many ways to list the candidates)
**Interviewer:** Both candidates seem well-qualified. Is there anything contributing to this rift, beyond just differing opinions?
**Guest:**
Well, the article mentions that Tajik was a vocal supporter of whistleblowers during the Trond Giske scandal. This suggests perhaps some committee members are looking for someone who embodies those values, while others might prioritize other qualities.
**Interviewer:** Interesting point. We know the Oslo list traditionally features national politicians. Could Gunaratnam’s local focus be contributing to the tension?
**Guest:** Absolutely. The committee might be grappling with the question of balance – whether to prioritize national representation or local representation in their top candidates.
**Interviewer:** We’ve seen the Labor party nationally focusing on social justice and addressing inequality. Does this play a role in the committee’s decision?
**Guest:** Absolutely. Both candidates have expressed strong commitment to social justice issues. However, their approaches might differ. Tajik, with her national experience, might be seen as someone who can drive these issues on a larger scale, while Gunaratnam’s focus on local issues could resonate more directly with voters looking for immediate change within Oslo.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, [Guest Name], for providing such insightful analysis on this crucial decision facing the Oslo Labor Party. This race is certainly one to watch as we approach the election.
**Guest:** My pleasure.
