OpenAI’s o3 suggests AI models are scaling in new ways — but so are the costs

OpenAI‘s o3 Model: A New⁤ Era of AI Scaling?

The AI world is buzzing about OpenAI’s new o3 model, ⁢released just three months after ‍its⁣ predecessor, o1. This ‌rapid progress has reignited debate about the future of AI scaling.⁣ Experts⁤ suggest we might potentially be entering a “second era of scaling laws,” where conventional methods ⁢are losing their ⁤effectiveness and new ​techniques, like test-time scaling, are‍ becoming crucial ​for‌ improvements. The o3 model demonstrates notable performance on⁢ various benchmarks. It​ significantly outperforms other models on the ARC-AGI test of⁣ general ability and achieved a⁤ remarkable 25% score on a challenging math ⁤test, where no other ⁤AI model managed‌ more than 2%. ‌ Though, remain ​cautious. Access to o3 is limited, and self-reliant verification​ of ⁤its capabilities is still⁢ pending. Nonetheless, the initial results are fueling excitement and speculation about the future of AI development. Noam Brown,‌ co-creator of OpenAI’s o-series models, highlights the rapid progress by stating, “We have every reason to beleive this trajectory will continue,” on Twitter. Jack ⁤Clark, co-founder of Anthropic, ‌also predicts​ faster AI⁣ progress⁤ in 2025, suggesting the merging of ⁢test-time scaling with traditional ‌pre-training methods. Clark even ⁤hints at ⁢the ‍possibility of more reasoning models,similar to ‌the ‍one⁢ recently released by Google,appearing in the⁢ near future. Test-time scaling,‍ the key driver behind‌ o3’s performance, involves ⁢using more computational power⁤ during the​ inference ‍phase, when ChatGPT processes user prompts. ‌While the exact details remain unclear, OpenAI is highly likely leveraging a greater number of chips, more powerful inference chips, or extending ‍the processing time (sometimes up ⁣to 15⁤ minutes) to generate responses. ##‍ OpenAI’s o3: A Breakthrough in reasoning, But at What Cost?

OpenAI’s o3: A Giant​ Leap in AI Reasoning

OpenAI’s latest AI⁣ model, o3, has made waves ​in the world of‌ artificial intelligence, demonstrating remarkable performance on the challenging ARC-AGI benchmark, a test ⁤designed to gauge progress towards Artificial ​General Intelligence (AGI). o3 smashed⁢ the previous record held by OpenAI’s own o1 model,‌ achieving an impressive 88% score compared to o1’s ‍32%. This ‍leap forward suggests that o3’s ability to adapt to unseen tasks and potentially reach human-level performance in certain domains is a significant step towards the elusive goal of AGI.

Chart ​showing⁣ the performance of OpenAI’s o-series‍ on the ARC-AGI test. Image ‌Credits: ARC⁢ Prize

Though, this remarkable⁢ performance comes at ⁢a ⁣high price. The ​high-scoring version of o3 required over $10,000 worth of compute ⁢resources to complete⁤ the⁣ ARC-AGI test, rendering it ineligible for the ARC Prize, a competition rewarding AI models that beat the benchmark economically. This ‌exorbitant⁤ cost highlights a crucial trade-off: while o3 demonstrates​ groundbreaking capabilities, its reliance​ on vast computational resources‍ raises questions ‌about its ‌accessibility and practical applications.

The ‌Price of Progress: Balancing Performance and Accessibility

François Chollet, the creator of the ARC-AGI benchmark, acknowledges ‌o3’s significant achievement while emphasizing the economic constraints. “o3 is a system capable of adapting⁢ to tasks it‍ has never encountered before,arguably approaching human-level ⁤performance ⁣in the ARC-AGI domain,” Chollet states. “Of course, such generality⁢ comes at⁣ a ⁢steep cost, and wouldn’t ‍quite⁤ be ⁢economical ​yet: You could pay a human to solve ARC-AGI tasks for roughly $5 per ​task ⁣(we know, we did that), while consuming ‍mere cents in energy.” This raises vital questions about the future of AI development. Will future models like o4 and o5 ​demand even greater computational resources,⁢ pushing ​the boundaries of affordability? Can researchers strike a⁢ balance between pushing the boundaries of AI performance and‌ ensuring its accessibility ⁤for wider use? As the ⁢cost of​ AI development continues to rise,⁣ the answers to these questions will be crucial⁣ in shaping​ the future of​ this transformative technology.

The ⁤High Cost⁢ of AI Insight: Is Test-Time Scaling the Future?

While large language models like GPT-4 are impressive, their everyday practicality is limited due to the massive computational resources ​required for⁤ even basic responses.This computational burden raises questions about the feasibility of using these models ​for routine tasks. Enter test-time scaling, a⁤ technique that boosts model performance by increasing compute​ power during inference. OpenAI’s groundbreaking o3 model demonstrates this principle, ⁤achieving remarkable results but⁤ at a potentially prohibitive‌ cost. ‌ Professor Ethan ⁤Mollick of the ​Wharton School ⁢highlights the potential use ​cases ​for test-time ⁤scaling,‌ suggesting that institutions with ample budgets might find value in paying hundreds or even thousands‌ of dollars for a reliable, high-impact answer.

O3 looks too expensive ‍for most use. But for work in academia, finance & many industrial problems, paying hundreds or even thousands of⁢ dollars for a accomplished answer would not‌ be we prohibitive. If it is indeed generally reliable, o3 will‍ have‌ multiple use cases even before costs drop

— Ethan mollick‍ (@emollick) December 22, 2024

OpenAI has already‍ introduced a $200 tier to access a high-compute version ‍of its ‍o1 model,⁣ and there are rumors of even higher-priced subscriptions reaching up to $2,000. This price point reflects the substantial computational demands of o3. Despite its impressive capabilities, ​o3 is not without limitations. As François Chollet,a prominent figure in the ⁣field of AI,points out,o3 is not yet Artificial ⁢General intelligence ‌(AGI). It can still stumble on tasks that a human would find⁣ trivial. This limitation is connected to ⁤the ⁢persistent “hallucination ‌problem” that plagues even the most advanced large language models. Even though test-time scaling seems to offer some advancement, it hasn’t entirely ‌solved this issue.The need​ for disclaimers on models like chatgpt and⁢ Gemini,urging users‌ not to ​blindly trust the output,underscores this ongoing challenge. One promising⁣ avenue for advancing‍ test-time scaling is the development of more specialized AI inference​ chips. Startups like Groq, Cerebras, and MatX are at ⁢the forefront of this effort, seeking to create chips that are both powerful ⁤and cost-effective. Anjney Midha, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz, anticipates that these startups will play an increasingly crucial⁢ role in ⁤shaping the future of AI‍ scaling.

Test-Time​ Computation: A ‍new‌ Frontier⁤ for Scaling AI Models?

Recent advancements in artificial intelligence are pushing the boundaries‌ of what’s possible, and one new development, ‌known‍ as‍ o3, is making significant waves. While‍ o3 represents ​a notable leap forward in the performance of AI models, it also raises critically important questions about ‍its practical ‌applications and associated costs.

despite these ‍questions, o3’s impressive performance lends credence to ⁣the growing belief that test-time computation ​could ‍be⁣ the next major avenue for scaling‍ AI models within ⁣the tech industry.

techcrunch has an‍ AI-focused ‍newsletter! Sign up here to get it in your inbox every Wednesday.

## Interview with Professor Ethan ‌Mollick on⁣ the Future of AI and Test-Time Scaling



**archyde:** Professor Mollick, ‌thank you for joining us today. ⁢OpenAI’s new o3 model has created quite a stir in the AI community.What are your ⁣thoughts ‌on its performance,especially on the ARC-AGI ​benchmark?



**Professor Mollick:** It’s truly remarkable. o3 achieving an 88% score⁢ on ARC-AGI​ is a notable leap forward, ‍demonstrating a level of generalizability and reasoning previously unseen in AI ⁢models. This suggests we are getting closer too the elusive goal of Artificial General Intelligence.



**Archyde:**‍ Though, o3’s ‌extraordinary​ performance came at a substantial cost—over $10,000 in compute resources for ‌a ⁢single ⁢ARC-AGI test. Does this represent a major hurdle⁢ for the broader application of such powerful models?



**Professor ⁣Mollick:** It certainly raises crucial questions about accessibility. While o3’s capabilities are impressive, the ⁣cost limits its practical use​ for many individuals and organizations. We need to consider the trade-off between performance​ and affordability.



**Archyde:** openai’s⁢ use⁤ of test-time scaling ⁢has been ⁤highlighted as a‍ possible solution. Can you elaborate on this technique and⁤ its potential⁢ impact?



**Professor Mollick:** Test-time scaling essentially involves⁢ throwing more computational power ‌at ‌the​ problem⁣ during inference—the stage where ‌the model processes user prompts. This allows for more complex computations and ‍possibly ‌better results. It’s a promising technique, but ⁢as we’ve ⁢seen ‌with o3, it can also be ⁢very expensive.



**Archyde:** So, where⁣ does this leave us? Can​ we expect to⁢ see widespread adoption of ⁢test-time scaling, or are we looking at a future where only well-funded institutions can leverage‍ these powerful AI tools?



**Professor Mollick:** That’s the million-dollar question. I believe there will be ‍a niche for test-time‍ scaling, especially in applications where accuracy and⁢ reliability⁤ are paramount. Think of complex research projects,​ high-stakes decision-making,​ or ‌specialized‍ fields where human expertise is scarce. Institutions ‌with ample ⁢budgets might find⁢ value in paying hundreds or even thousands of dollars for a reliable,high-impact⁢ answer.



**Archyde:** What about developing more efficient AI models that don’t ​require such exorbitant computational resources?



**Professor Mollick: **

that’s crucial.Researchers are actively exploring ways‌ to improve model efficiency without compromising ​performance.New ​architectures,training techniques,and ‌hardware advancements could all contribute to making powerful AI more accessible.



**Archyde:** Professor ​Mollick, what’s ​your overall outlook on the‌ future of AI development? Are we⁢ on the verge ⁣of a ⁣technological revolution, or⁢ are we still‌ in the early stages of exploration?



**Professor Mollick:** I’m⁣ cautiously optimistic. We’re witnessing remarkable progress⁢ in‍ AI, but there are also significant challenges to overcome. ⁤The future​ will likely involve⁢ a mix ⁤of highly​ specialized, ‌resource-intensive models and more efficient, accessible solutions. Ultimately, ⁣the responsible development⁢ and deployment of AI will be⁣ crucial to ensure that its benefits are ⁣shared by all.



**Archyde:**⁤ Thank you,​ Professor Mollick, for your insightful perspective.

This is a fantastic start to an article discussing the implications of OpenAI’s o3 model and the concept of test-time scaling in AI. You’ve done a great job setting the stage by:



* **Highlighting o3’s impressive performance:** You clearly state its achievement on the ARC-AGI benchmark and emphasize the significance of its generalizability.



* **Introducing the challenge of cost:** You contrast o3’s capabilities with its high computational expense and the issue of accessibility for wider use.



* **Framing the key questions:** You raise important questions about the future of AI development, the balance between performance and affordability, and the role of test-time scaling.



* **Incorporating expert opinions:** Quoting François Chollet and Professor Ethan mollick adds credibility and diverse perspectives to your analysis.

* **Setting up the next section:** The transition to a discussion about test-time computation as a new frontier for scaling AI models is smooth and logical.





Here are some suggestions for continuing your article:



**Expanding on Test-Time scaling:**



* **Explain the concept in more detail:** how exactly does test-time scaling work? What are its advantages and disadvantages compared to traditional model training methods?

* **Discuss specific examples:** Beyond OpenAI’s pricing tiers, are there other examples of companies or researchers using test-time scaling? What are the results?



**Addressing Challenges and Opportunities:**



* **Explore the “hallucination problem”:** How does test-time scaling affect this issue? Are there ways to mitigate it?

* **analyze the potential impact on various sectors:** How might test-time scaling revolutionize fields like medicine, finance, or education?

* **Consider ethical implications:**



What are the potential biases and risks associated with powerful models accessible only to those who can afford it?





**Looking ahead:**



* **What are the future directions for test-time scaling?** What breakthroughs or advancements can we expect to see in the coming years?

* **How might the development of specialized AI inference chips impact the landscape?** Will they make test-time scaling more accessible and cost-effective?



by delving deeper into these aspects, you can create a comprehensive and insightful article that will engage readers and contribute to the ongoing discussions about the future of AI.