American newspaper New York Times Chat GPT The manufacturer is OpenAI and Microsoft A case has been filed for alleged copyright infringement.
The newspaper accuses the companies in the lawsuit of using the newspaper’s intellectual property to train large language models used by ChatGPT.
In the lawsuit filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the New York Times says it is seeking “statutory and actual damages” for “unlawful copying and use of The Times’ uniquely valuable work.” Billions of dollars’ should be paid.
Chat is a large model of the GPT language that allows users to receive human-generated text, images, or videos even though the content is Artificial intelligence Creates.
The lawsuit claimed that ‘millions’ of New York Times articles were used to train ChatGPT and that it was now competing with the newspaper as a source of information.
This section contains related reference points (Related Nodes field).
The paper added in its statement that it “recognizes the power and potential of Jane AI for the public and journalism,” but the paper also said its content should not be used for commercial gain by other companies. should
The New York Times added that ‘Muslim copyright law protects our journalism and content. If Microsoft and OpenAI want to use our work for commercial purposes, by law they should first get our permission, (however) they didn’t.’
A spokesperson for OpenAI, on the other hand, said they were ‘surprised and disappointed’ by the lawsuit.
A spokesperson for the company told The Independent: ‘We respect the rights of content creators and owners and are committed to working with them to ensure that they can use artificial intelligence technology and new revenue streams. Take advantage of the models.’
The spokesperson added, ‘Our discussions with The New York Times have been productive and are moving forward constructively. Therefore, we are surprised and disappointed by this development. We hope to find a mutually beneficial way to work together, as we are doing with many other publishers.’
The Independent has contacted Microsoft for comment.
The lawsuit accuses Microsoft and OpenAI of ‘massive copyright infringement’, saying their artificial intelligence systems were used ‘to make numerous copies of The Times’ intellectual property rights in order to GPT models can be developed, which take advantage of the copyright in these works and in some cases retain a large part of them.’
Microsoft has invested more than $10 billion in OpenAI.
The lawsuit said the newspaper attempted an “amicable resolution” of the issue with the companies in April, which failed.
Join Independent Urdu’s WhatsApp channel for authentic news and current affairs analysis Here Click
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘2494823637234887’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
#Copyright #York #Times #OpenAI #lawsuit #Microsoft
2024-09-08 18:29:27
OpenAI New York Times lawsuit
Table of Contents
New York Times Sues OpenAI and Microsoft for Copyright Infringement Over ChatGPT
The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the manufacturer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, its partner, alleging copyright infringement. The lawsuit claims that the companies used the newspaper’s intellectual property to train large language models used by ChatGPT without permission.
According to the lawsuit, “millions” of New York Times articles were used to train ChatGPT, which has now become a competitor to the newspaper as a source of information. The New York Times is seeking “statutory and actual damages” of billions of dollars for the alleged “unlawful copying and use of The Times’ uniquely valuable work.” [[2]]
ChatGPT, a large language model, allows users to receive human-generated text, images, or videos, even though the content is created using artificial intelligence. The lawsuit accuses Microsoft and OpenAI of “massive copyright infringement,” saying their artificial intelligence systems were used to make numerous copies of The Times’ intellectual property rights to develop GPT models.
The New York Times recognizes the power and potential of artificial intelligence for the public and journalism, but argues that its content should not be used for commercial gain by other companies without permission. The newspaper says it attempted an ”amicable resolution” of the issue with the companies in April, which failed.
A spokesperson for OpenAI expressed surprise and disappointment at the lawsuit, stating that the company respects the rights of content creators and owners and is committed to working with them to ensure they can use artificial intelligence technology and new revenue streams. [[2]]
Meanwhile, OpenAI is reportedly in talks to complete a deal that would value the company at $100 billion or more, a $20 billion increase from previous valuations. [[1]]The company is also testing an A.I.-powered search engine, which could potentially further exacerbate the competition with traditional news sources like The New York Times. [[2]]
The lawsuit highlights the tension between traditional content creators and AI-powered models that rely on their work to function. As AI technology continues to evolve, it raises important questions about copyright law and the role of content creators in the development of these models.
In a related development, the Italian edition of Wired reported on the ongoing “war” between OpenAI and The New York Times, noting that OpenAI hopes to emerge unscathed from the legal battle. [[3]]
The case has significant implications for the future of AI development and content creation, and will likely be closely watched by industry experts and stakeholders.
Keywords: OpenAI, Microsoft, New York Times, ChatGPT, copyright infringement, artificial intelligence, AI-powered search engine, content creation, intellectual property.
Meta Description: The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement over ChatGPT, alleging that the companies used the newspaper’s intellectual property without permission. The case has significant implications for AI development and content creation.
New York Times OpenAI lawsuit pdf
The New York Times vs. OpenAI and Microsoft: A Landmark Copyright Infringement Case
The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, the manufacturer of ChatGPT, and Microsoft, accusing them of copyright infringement by using the newspaper’s intellectual property to train large language models used by ChatGPT. This lawsuit marks a significant milestone in the debate over artificial intelligence and copyright law, and has sparked intense interest in the tech and legal communities.
The Allegations
According to the lawsuit, OpenAI and Microsoft used “millions” of New York Times articles to train ChatGPT, a large language model that generates human-like text, images, and videos using artificial intelligence [[3]]. The New York Times alleges that this unauthorized use of their content constitutes “massive copyright infringement” and is seeking “statutory and actual damages” to the tune of billions of dollars [[2]]. The lawsuit claims that OpenAI and Microsoft copied and used the newspaper’s uniquely valuable work without permission, violating the newspaper’s intellectual property rights.
The Response from OpenAI and Microsoft
OpenAI has expressed surprise and disappointment at the lawsuit, stating that they respect the rights of content creators and owners and are committed to working with them to ensure that they can use artificial intelligence technology and new revenue streams [[2]]. A spokesperson for OpenAI said that their discussions with The New York Times had been productive and were moving forward constructively, and that they hoped to find a mutually beneficial way to work together [[2]].
Microsoft has also been contacted for comment, but has not yet responded.
The Implications
This lawsuit has significant implications for the future of artificial intelligence and copyright law. As AI technology continues to evolve and become more prevalent, questions about ownership and fair use of copyrighted material are likely to arise. The outcome of this case will set a precedent for how AI companies can use and compensate content creators for their work.
The Legal Background
The lawsuit highlights the tension between copyright law and the development of artificial intelligence. While copyright law protects the intellectual property rights of content creators, it is unclear how these laws apply to AI systems that generate new content based on existing works. This case will test the limits of copyright law and its application to AI technology.
Expert Opinion
According to a Harvard Law expert, this lawsuit is the first big test for AI in the copyright space [[1]]. The expert notes that the case raises important questions about the limits of copyright law and how it should be applied to AI systems.
Conclusion
The New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft is a landmark case that will have significant implications for the future of artificial intelligence and copyright law. As the case unfolds, it will be important to watch how the legal system grapples with the complex issues raised by AI technology and its use of copyrighted material.
References:
