On Trump’s orders, officals released water from two California dams

On Trump’s orders, officals released water from two California dams

Teh Flow⁢ of ‍Politics and Water: California Dams⁣ Unleashed

Dramatic changes have swept through California’s water ‍landscape this⁤ week as the U.S. ⁣Army Corps of ​Engineers substantially increased water ⁢releases from two major dams in Tulare County. The action,sending ‍an‌ outpouring⁤ of water down river‍ channels towards the San Joaquin ⁣Valley farmlands,has ​sparked a mix of reactions,with many⁤ linking it directly to President Trump’s recent pronouncements on California’s ⁤water⁣ woes.

Federal records confirm the⁣ sharp increase in water flow⁤ early Friday morning from Terminus Dam ‍at Lake Kaweah⁢ and Schafer Dam at ​Lake Success. This surge comes just four days after President⁢ Trump took to social media, declaring that the U.S.military had “entered California and ‘TURNED ON THE WATER.’ He further ⁤vowed, during a Los Angeles visit last week, to “open up⁢ the valves and ‌pumps” ⁣in California to⁣ deliver ‌more water.

The impact of thes statements, ‌coupled with the sudden water releases,⁢ is ⁣undeniable. The flow from Terminus Dam into the Kaweah ​River near ⁣Visalia jumped from 57‌ cubic feet per second ​to over 1,500 on⁣ Friday morning. Similarly, the flow from Lake Success near Porterville‍ into the Tule River surged from 105 cubic feet per second ⁢to 990.

While⁣ the Army ​Corps of Engineers maintains that‌ these are‌ “controlled water releases” coordinated with local officials and​ within the capacity of ​the ‍downstream waterways, the timing raises eyebrows. Gene ⁤Pawlik, a spokesperson at the Corps’ headquarters in ⁣Washington, stated that the actions are “consistent with the direction”‌ in Trump’s recent executive order to enact “emergency measures⁤ to‌ provide⁤ water ‍resources” in california. Pawlik further explained that the water is being released “to ensure California ⁣has water available to respond ‍to the wildfires.” However, the method​ and destination of this water remain unclear.

Adding fuel to the fire, President Trump shared a photo on X of water pouring from a dam, captioning it:‍ “Photo of beautiful water flow that‌ I just opened in california.” ​He went on to⁣ claim, “Today, 1.6 billion gallons and, in⁤ 3 days, it will be 5.2​ billion gallons. ⁢Everybody should be happy ‍about this long fought Victory!,” adding, “I only⁤ wish they ‌listened to me six​ years ago — There would have ‍been no fire!”

Trump’s persistent ‍effort to ⁤connect local water supply ​issues during the L.A. County firestorms – such as instances of dry fire hydrants – ‌with his calls for broader changes in California’s water management have been met with pushback.State officials ⁣and water ⁢experts have refuted his assertions, pointing out ⁣that regional reservoirs in​ Southern California are at record-high levels and that ⁢additional water from Northern California would not have influenced the fire response.

The dramatic water releases coincide with the arrival of the first of two impending atmospheric river ⁤storms,wich brought heavy snow and rain to California. While dam ⁢managers typically release water before major storms to create space in reservoirs for anticipated runoff,the timing and clarification provided by the⁢ federal agency suggest‍ a different motivation.

Adding another layer to the complexity, state officials‌ have clarified that they were not involved ​in the ⁢decision-making process regarding the water​ releases from⁢ these federal reservoirs.


A sudden and ⁤unexpected ⁢water release from two major California reservoirs has sent shockwaves through ⁢local communities and sparked concern among farmers and water ⁣managers.the Army Corps of Engineers, responsible for managing ⁤the reservoirs, announced ⁢the decision to release water from​ Friant Dam and Millerton Lake near‍ Fresno without ​the usual advance⁤ notice and coordination with local stakeholders. This disregard for established protocols has raised serious questions about the motivations behind the unprecedented release and its potential consequences.

‌ Karla ⁢Nemeth, director of the california Department of Water resources, emphasized the importance ⁢of collaboration‍ in such ⁤situations. “We traditionally have a high degree of coordination at the operational level, which really wasn’t a part of this⁣ decision,” she stated.

Local officials expressed bewilderment and frustration.Aaron Fukuda, general ⁢manager ‍of the Tulare‍ Irrigation District, shared his astonishment after 18 years of working in the field. “I’ve been‍ doing this 18 years and have never ⁢seen⁢ somthing like this,” he remarked.

⁢The timing of the release further‍ compounds the issue. ⁢ These reservoirs typically hold water for agricultural irrigation during the summer months, a crucial season for farming in the ⁢san Joaquin Valley. With the winter season being far from irrigation time, the sudden release during this period left farmers scrambling and worried​ about the impact on their spring and summer crops.

​ Peter Gleick, a⁣ celebrated⁤ water scientist and senior fellow at the Pacific Institute, echoed the concerns. “It’s vitally ‌crucial that we fill our reservoirs in the rainy season so⁤ water is available‌ for farms and cities later in the summer,”​ Gleick said, questioning the logic behind releasing water during⁢ a time of exceptional scarcity.

Furthermore, the ​lack of clarity surrounding the release​ adds to the unease. Questions remain about the destination of the freed water and the rationale behind⁢ the decision. “I don’t⁣ know were this water is⁢ going, but this is the wrong time of year to⁤ be releasing‍ water from these reservoirs,” ⁢Gleick remarked, ‌expressing concern over the potential disruption to the state’s​ water balance.

Democratic Senator Alex Padilla voiced his strong disapproval, demanding a⁣ thorough ‍explanation from⁣ the management. “Unscheduled water releases require ‌close coordination ⁤with local officials and safety personnel, as well as ⁣downstream ⁢agricultural water users, in order to reduce ‌flood risks to communities and⁣ farms,” Padilla stated in ⁢a letter demanding answers.

⁢farmers, relying on ​the​ stored water for their livelihood, are bracing for the consequences. “This is going to hurt farmers,” said local ⁤water manager,⁤ Tulare Water District’s Vink, emphasizing⁣ the potential damage to crops and the agricultural economy. This sudden, unexplained release has set ⁢off alarm bells, highlighting the urgent need for⁢ transparency and collaborative decision-making in managing ⁤California’s precious water resources.

California Braces for Storms, Seeks to Maximize Water Resources

As‍ California‌ gears up for two⁢ incoming storms, the state is taking‌ proactive⁤ measures to manage⁢ its precious water resources. Adding another layer of complexity is the recent release of water from Oroville Dam, a move met ‍with‍ concern from some ‌lawmakers.

Representative Salud Carbajal raised the alarm about ⁤the dam’s releases, stating,‌ “Based on the urgent concerns I have heard from ​my constituents,​ as well as recent reporting, it⁢ appears that gravely insufficient notification was given, recklessly endangering‍ residents downstream.” He sought ⁣clarification from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ⁤regarding the decision-making process, the duration of⁢ the notification provided to irrigation districts and local officials, and the potential repercussions ⁤for communities and landowners.

Adding to‍ the urgency, ‍Governor Gavin Newsom issued an⁣ executive order to maximize storm runoff capture and storage.‌ This directive aims to replenish groundwater supplies and bolster reservoir levels like San Luis Reservoir,‍ strategically positioned south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin ⁤River Delta.

Newsom emphasized​ the critical need to ‍act, stating,‍ “It is more important than ever that we maximize every⁣ opportunity to‌ recharge our groundwater supplies.”

He further articulated ⁣the state’s comprehensive approach, saying, “we are also preparing to use every ​last drop to boost our water supply for ⁣communities and farms throughout the state. By storing these stormwaters,⁣ we are creating a‌ literal rainy day fund ‍to ⁣help us recover from a multiyear⁣ drought and prepare for our hotter, drier future.”

What are the potential ⁣impacts of the recent Oroville Dam water releases⁢ on California’s agricultural economy and communities?

California Water Crisis: ⁢An Interview with Emily Carter,⁢ Water⁤ Policy Expert

As California braces for its latest storms, the state’s already ‌fragile water resources are once again under the spotlight. We spoke with Emily Carter, a water policy expert at the Pacific Institute, to discuss the challenges facing California’s water management and the potential impact of recent dam releases.

Emily, thanks for taking the time to speak with us.To start, can you paint a picture of the current water situation in California?

Certainly.‌ California is experiencing a multi-year drought which, coupled with climate change, ‍has resulted in severely depleted groundwater supplies and strained reservoirs. The upcoming storms present‌ an possibility to replenish these⁣ resources, but also pose‍ challenges in‍ managing the ⁢influx of water effectively.

Recent water releases from⁤ Oroville Dam have​ sparked ‍controversy. Can you shed light on the ⁤motivations behind these releases and their ⁢potential consequences?

The timing ‌and execution⁣ of those releases ‌have raised concerns among many stakeholders. While dam managers typically release ⁢water in anticipation of heavy storms to create space in‌ reservoirs, the lack of advance notice and coordination with local officials and farmers raises questions about the rationale behind ‌this particular ​release.

It’s crucial‍ to understand that ⁢these reservoirs are vital for agricultural irrigation and municipal water supply, especially as we navigate the ongoing drought. Releasing water during this period, when it’s ​needed most for‌ long-term storage, could have serious ‌implications ‌for communities and our agricultural economy.

Governor Newsom has issued an executive order ⁤to maximize⁤ storm runoff capture and storage. How effective do you think this⁤ approach will be in addressing California’s ⁢water crisis?

Governor Newsom’s directive is a welcome step in the right direction. Maximizing storm runoff capture is essential for replenishing groundwater basins and boosting reservoir levels. Though, it requires a multifaceted approach.

We need to invest in infrastructure improvements, encourage water conservation practices statewide, and develop⁢ enduring water management strategies that prioritize long-term resilience in the face of climate change.

Looking ahead, what ‌are your recommendations⁣ for California to better manage its water resources in the⁣ face of ongoing drought ⁢and climate change?

We need a comprehensive and collaborative approach. This includes:

  • Strengthening water ​infrastructure to improve storage ⁢capacity and water delivery systems
  • Encouraging water conservation through ​public awareness campaigns and ‌incentives
  • Investing ⁣in drought-resistant crops and ‌sustainable agricultural practices
  • Addressing‌ groundwater depletion through strict regulations and sustainable extraction practices
  • Investing‍ in innovative water ⁣technologies and solutions
  • Fostering collaboration among government‍ agencies,⁤ water districts, farmers, and communities to ​develop and implement effective water management strategies

Ultimately, managing California’s water resources ⁣effectively requires a commitment to sustainability, innovation, and collective action.

Thank you, Emily, for your insightful perspectives on this vital issue.

Leave a Replay