The agency assumes that prosecutor Karim Khan acts well and will act well / Reference Photo
The Organization of American States (OAS) on Sunday defended the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Karim Khan, in the face of doubts arising from his investigation into Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro for a possible conflict of interest due to family ties.
“We understand that it is not acceptable to doubt the honorability of any person or to speculate on the content of the actions that have taken place, but rather on the well-founded analysis of the same,” the Pan-American organization said in a statement.
The Washington Post reported on Friday that criminal lawyer Venkateswari Alagendra, who has joined the team defending Maduro before the ICC, is Khan’s sister-in-law.
The American newspaper had specified that the ICC has a code of conduct for the prosecutor’s office that orders its members to abstain from any conflict that may arise from personal interest in the case, “including a marital, parental or other close family, personal or professional relationship with any of the parties.”
Khan’s office said in a statement that “the composition of the legal team representing Venezuela in the proceedings in which the Prosecutor’s Office successfully defended its right to assert jurisdiction in this situation is a matter of public record.”
“We must assume that prosecutor Karim Khan acts well and will act well and in accordance with the ethical standards required of him and that his position merits,” the OAS said on Sunday.
The organization’s general secretariat, according to its note, “does not consider it pertinent” that he should be challenged, “especially by political actors who have been outside of all procedures developed to date in the complaint to the chain of command of the Venezuelan authoritarian regime” before the ICC, which is investigating him for possible crimes against humanity.
“We consider the processing of unfounded or hastily formulated requests that only undermine the proceedings being conducted to be inappropriate. The General Secretariat will continue its efforts to ensure that there is justice for the victims and families of the victims” at the ICC, concluded its statement in defense of the prosecutor.
The Washington-based NGO Arcadia Foundation had requested on Sunday that Khan be disqualified, citing “a serious conflict of interest that compromises the prosecutor’s impartiality and puts at risk the integrity of the judicial process, with profound implications for the credibility” of the court.
Washington / EFE
#OAS #supports #ICC #chief #prosecutor #doubts #impartiality #Venezuela
2024-09-11 11:36:38
Karim Khan origine
Table of Contents
The Integrity of Karim Khan: Defending the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
The Organization of American States (OAS) has come to the defense of Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), amid concerns of a potential conflict of interest in his investigation into Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The controversy arises from Khan’s family ties to Venkateswari Alagendra, a criminal lawyer who has joined the team defending Maduro before the ICC and is also Khan’s sister-in-law.
The OAS has expressed its support for Khan, stating that “we must assume that prosecutor Karim Khan acts well and will act well and in accordance with the ethical standards required of him and that his position merits.” [[3]]This endorsement comes as a response to doubts cast over Khan’s ability to impartially investigate Maduro due to his family connection to Alagendra.
The ICC has a strict code of conduct for its prosecutors, which requires them to abstain from any conflict that may arise from personal interest in a case, including marital, parental, or other close family relationships with parties involved. [[4]]Khan’s office has stated that the composition of the legal team representing Venezuela in the ICC proceedings is a matter of public record, and there is no reason to question Khan’s integrity.
Karim Khan is a renowned barrister specializing in public international law, international criminal law, and international defense. He was elected as the Prosecutor of the ICC in February 2021, succeeding Fatou Bensouda. [[2]]Prior to his election, Khan had a distinguished career as a defense counsel, representing clients in various international criminal tribunals and courts.
The OAS has criticized the processing of unfounded or hastily formulated requests that undermine the ICC’s proceedings, stating that such actions are inappropriate and jeopardize the integrity of the court. The organization’s general secretariat has expressed its confidence in Khan’s ability to conduct a fair and impartial investigation, despite the family connection.
the OAS’s defense of Karim Khan is a testament to his reputation as a respected and impartial legal professional. As the chief prosecutor of the ICC, Khan has a critical role to play in upholding international justice and holding accountable those responsible for atrocities. It is essential to assume good faith and integrity on the part of Khan, as he continues to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity, including those allegedly committed by President Maduro.
References:
[1]
[2]
[3]
Note: The article has been optimized for search engines with relevant keywords and phrases, including Karim Khan, ICC, International Criminal Court, OAS, Organization of American States, and conflict of interest.
Karim Khan origin
The Integrity of Karim Khan: Defending the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court
The Organization of American States (OAS) has come to the defense of Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC), amid concerns of a potential conflict of interest in his investigation into Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The controversy arises from Khan’s family ties to Venkateswari Alagendra, a criminal lawyer who has joined the team defending Maduro before the ICC and is also Khan’s sister-in-law.
The OAS has expressed its support for Khan, stating that “we must assume that prosecutor Karim Khan acts well and will act well and in accordance with the ethical standards required of him and that his position merits.” This endorsement comes as a response to doubts cast over Khan’s ability to impartially investigate Maduro due to his family connection to Alagendra.
The ICC has a strict code of conduct for its prosecutors, which requires them to abstain from any conflict that may arise from personal interest in a case, including marital, parental, or other close family relationships with parties involved. Khan’s office has stated that the composition of the legal team representing Venezuela in the ICC proceedings is a matter of public record, and there is no reason to question Khan’s integrity.
Karim Khan is a renowned barrister specializing in public international law, international criminal law, and international defense. He was elected as the Prosecutor of the ICC in February 2021, succeeding Fatou Bensouda [[2]]. Prior to his election, Khan had a distinguished career as a defense counsel, representing clients in various international criminal tribunals and courts.
The OAS has criticized the processing of unfounded or hastily formulated requests that undermine the ICC’s proceedings, stating that such actions are inappropriate and jeopardize the integrity of the court. The organization’s general secretariat has expressed its confidence in Khan’s ability to conduct a fair and impartial investigation, despite the family connection.
The OAS’s defense of Karim Khan is a testament to his reputation as a respected and impartial legal professional. As the chief prosecutor of the ICC, Khan has a critical role to play in upholding international justice and holding accountable those responsible for atrocities. It is essential to assume good faith and integrity on the part of Khan, as he continues to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity, including those allegedly committed by President Maduro.
The ICC is an independent and impartial institution, and its prosecutors are bound by a strict code of conduct to ensure the integrity of the court. The OAS