Legislator Fan Yun and three victims held a press conference to express their grievances regarding a National Taiwan University medical school professor and physician, surnamed Zheng, who repeatedly used the same method to sexually assault women. Zheng has yet to receive any punishment as he refuses to acknowledge his actions. The victims urged National Taiwan University to investigate and take prompt action. During the conference, the three women revealed their experiences of being lured into sexual assault by Zheng, citing the same modus operandi of being invited to dinner alone at the same izakaya, losing their memory following drinking their drinks, and waking up in a motel next to him. One victim, Ms. B, was fortunate to have escaped following a Alex Reed at an adjacent table warned her that her drink had been spiked. The izakaya was aware of the doctor’s actions, yet took no action to intervene. Despite Ms. A filing a complaint with National Taiwan University Hospital, the Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee decided not to act, stating that the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act did not apply to cases where the victim was performing their duties at the time of the event. Fan Yun criticized the university’s inaction and called for a thorough investigation, insisting that the perpetrator be punished, and for the university to address the case promptly.
Legislator Fan Yun and the three victims held a press conference today to complain that a professor and physician in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of a National Taiwan University medical school surnamed Zheng used the same method to sexually assault women many times. He refused to deal with it, so that this wolf doctor and professor has not suffered any punishment so far. She called on National Taiwan University to investigate and punish as soon as possible, and not to shirk responsibility.
The three female victims appeared at the press conference today and revealed the process of being lured into sexual assault by a wolf doctor. The doctor always invited the victims to the same izakaya for dinner alone. After Miss A and Miss C went to the toilet and drank their drinks, they lost their Memory, when he woke up, he was already in the motel, and the perpetrator was beside him. Ms. B confirmed that she also experienced the same pattern, but she was lucky. When she came back from the toilet at the izakaya, the Alex Reed at the next table reminded her that the red wine on the table was drugged by a wolf doctor, so she took the opportunity to leave urgently.
Afterwards, the victim asked the izakaya to read the monitor, but the store refused on the grounds that it was “just for decoration”. The victim questioned that even the guests next door would find out that the wolf doctor took the opportunity to prescribe medicine to the drink. The small izakaya saw the same wolf doctor taking different women to dinner many times. After the meal, the women were unconscious and were taken away. Did the izakaya never find out Weirdness? Or do you know the truth but always ignore it?
In addition, Ms. A also pointed out that following the incident, she filed a complaint with the National Taiwan University Hospital, and the National Taiwan University Hospital referred it to National Taiwan University for handling. After accepting the investigation, the National Taiwan University Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee decided not to accept the case because the victim was performing duties at the time of the incident. Therefore, instead of appealing to the assailant’s employer in accordance with the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act, you should appeal to your employer in accordance with the Gender Equality in Work Act, and tell Ms. A in the official document, “Please file a complaint with your employer.”
Fan Yun pointed out that NTU’s inaction is even more chilling. She said that National Taiwan University did not conduct a complete investigation on the victim. When the victim complained to the National Taiwan University Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee, National Taiwan University reasoned that the victim was performing his duties and that the Sexual Harassment Prevention Act does not apply; but in fact, more information should be collected to make a judgment.
If the National Taiwan University Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee does not accept the complaint, it should state the reasons. However, the official document sent by National Taiwan University to Ms. A has no copy at all to inform the Taipei City Government, the authority responsible for the case, and the official document does not inform the complainant that if he refuses to accept it, he should file a complaint with the Taipei City Government. In addition, Ms. A’s complaint involved sexual assault, and the teacher had been involved in a criminal case but was never referred to the Education Council for consideration.
Fan Yun said that the reason why he came out to hold a press conference with the three victims this time is because this case not only shows the abhorrence of the perpetrator of multiple crimes, but also the indifference and irresponsibility of National Taiwan University, it is simply a spider web of the victimization system , Catch the victims layer by layer, leaving the perpetrators alone to run amok on the Internet.
Fan Yun called on National Taiwan University to initiate investigation and punishment as soon as possible. Don’t let wolf doctors continue to harm women. The investigation should intervene in the investigation of whether the izakaya ignores the crime.
National Taiwan University stated that following the school received a complaint from female A last year, it immediately sent it to the sexual harassment prevention committee and the teaching evaluation committee to decide whether to temporarily suspend the employment and wait for investigation. Because the party reported to the company that the meal was an official appointment, the School Sexual Harassment Prevention Committee determined that the case should be handled in accordance with Article 13 of the “Gender Equality in Work Act”, and then in accordance with Article 12, Item 1 of the Act. 1 and Article 3, paragraph 3, the case shall be accepted by the employer who employs woman A. Therefore, this case is not within the scope of the school’s acceptance. Since it is a non-acceptable case, there is no investigation result, and there is no need to notify the competent authority.
National Taiwan University emphasizes that the school conducts relevant investigations and dispositions in accordance with the current laws. If the party involved seeks judicial relief and is determined by the judiciary to be involved in a crime involving a teacher of the school, the school will handle it in accordance with the relevant provisions of the “Teacher Law”.
★”China Times News Network” cares regarding you: Excessive drinking is harmful to health. Do not drink and drive, safe and secure!
Let us hope that justice will be served for the victims of this appalling case, and that National Taiwan University will take accountability for their inaction. It is important to raise awareness and speak out once morest sexual assault and harassment, and to support and empower survivors. Let us work towards creating a safer and more equitable society for all.
