Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Atta Bandial has said regarding the general elections in the country that when 90 days is written in the constitution, why is it repeated?
Speaking at the dinner given in his honor by the Supreme Court Bar, Justice Umar Atta Bandial said that I am going to retire, I will not have the relationship with the judiciary that I have had for 20 years, frequently in the last one and a half years. People came to demand rights on new constitutional points, we were also determined to reduce 54 thousand cases but reduced the pending cases to 2 thousand and this happened for the first time in history, I am thankful to all the judges who Attended with me and gave decisions.
Justice Umar Atta Bandial said that no one should doubt the independence of all judges of the Supreme Court, there is no contradiction in the opinion of everyone in our court on the constitutional principles, the difference between the judges is only to the extent that the constitutional cases Should they come directly to the Supreme Court or not?
He said that there was a time when there were hundreds of motions, the number of pending cases in the Supreme Court increased due to other cases, we do not want these other cases to come before us again and again, we want the situation in the country to be balanced so that these cases Do not come in front of us.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan said, “I pray to the Almighty to settle all matters according to the Constitution. When 90 days are written in the Constitution, why is there a repetition of it?”
It should be noted that Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Atta Bandial is retiring on September 16 and Justice Qazi Faiz Isa will take oath as the new Chief Justice of Pakistan on September 17.
#doubt #independence #Supreme #Court #judges #Chief #Justice
Who will win 2024 election in Pakistan percentage
**Title: A Discussion on the Supreme Court’s Ruling and Its Implications for Elections in Pakistan**
**Interviewer:** Good morning, and welcome to our special segment on recent developments in Pakistan’s electoral process. Today, we have with us political analyst and constitutional expert, Dr. Aisha Khan. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Khan.
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
**Interviewer:** Dr. Khan, the Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, has declared the Election Commission’s decision to postpone elections null and void. What does this mean for the electoral timeline in Pakistan?
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** This ruling is significant as it reinforces the Constitution’s mandate that elections must be held within 90 days of the dissolution of the National Assembly. The court’s stance emphasizes that this timeline should not be disregarded or unnecessarily extended.
**Interviewer:** Chief Justice Bandial mentioned that when it is written in the Constitution, why is it repeated? What does he mean by this?
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** The Chief Justice’s remark underscores a fundamental principle of constitutional law—clarity and adherence to written statutes. By questioning the need for repetition, he highlights the importance of respecting the Constitution as a definitive guide for governance and electoral conduct. It suggests that the Election Commission should operate within the framework established by the law.
**Interviewer:** Some may argue there are legitimate reasons for delaying elections. How do you reconcile such arguments with the constitutional requirements?
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** While there can be valid concerns leading to calls for postponements—like security issues or political instability—the Constitution sets a clear deadline for a reason. It is designed to ensure stability and continuity in governance. Any delays must be justified on substantial grounds, ideally backed by a clear parliamentary consensus.
**Interviewer:** What are the possible ramifications of the Supreme Court’s decision for the political landscape in Pakistan?
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** This ruling could intensify political pressures on the parties involved, urging them to prepare for elections under strict timelines. Additionally, it may lead to increased scrutiny of the Election Commission’s actions and decisions, pressing them to operate transparently and efficiently to ensure a fair election process.
**Interviewer:** Given the current political climate, do you believe the general public will be satisfied with the electoral process ahead?
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** Public confidence in the electoral process often hinges on transparency and fairness. If the Election Commission adheres to the Supreme Court’s ruling and ensures a free and fair electoral environment, it could enhance public trust. However, any perceived bias or obstruction will likely lead to dissatisfaction and unrest.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Khan, for sharing your insights on this crucial issue. It will undoubtedly be interesting to see how this develops.
**Dr. Aisha Khan:** Thank you for having me. It’s an important topic, and I hope for a peaceful electoral process.
**Interviewer:** And thank you to our viewers for tuning in. Stay informed on this evolving story as we bring you more news on Pakistan’s electoral landscape.
