It is worth noting that Mike Waltz, 50 years old, is a Republican representative from Florida, and was elected to Congress in 2018, where he succeeded the other Republican, Ron DeSantis, in the House of Representatives.
If he is appointed to the position of National Security Advisor to the US President, which is currently held by Jake Sullivan, Waltz will manage many security files and crises, including the conflict in Ukraine and Israel’s wars in the Middle East against the Palestinian and Lebanese faction movements.
It is noteworthy that Waltz is a retired colonel in the US Army, and participated in US military operations in Afghanistan.
Waltz has been a long-time supporter of Trump, as he supported the lawsuit over alleged violations during the 2020 presidential elections in several states, which was rejected by the Supreme Court, and he voted against forming a commission to investigate the storming of the Capitol by Trump supporters on January 6, 2021, and also supported Trump. During this year’s Republican primaries.
He is known as one of the “hawks” within the Republican Party regarding policies towards China. Waltz stated in 2021 that the United States is “in a state of cold war with the Chinese Communist Party.”
It should be noted that Trump, who won the presidential elections that took place on November 5, will have to present his candidates to assume various positions in his new administration to Congress following his inauguration as President of the United States on January 20.
Source: “Wall Street Journal” + RT
#Newspaper #Trump #chooses #Representative #Mike #Waltz #position #National #Security #Advisor
**Interview with Mike Waltz: Potential National Security Advisor**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Mike. With potential appointment as National Security Advisor, how do you plan to tackle the pressing security issues facing the U.S., such as the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East?
**Mike Waltz:** Thank you for having me. The current security landscape is incredibly complex. My military background gives me a unique perspective on these situations. I believe in a strong, proactive approach to supporting our allies and countering aggression from state and non-state actors alike.
**Interviewer:** You have been described as a “hawk” within the Republican Party, especially regarding China. How do you envision the U.S.’s relationship with China evolving during your potential tenure, considering you described it as a “cold war”?
**Mike Waltz:** We must approach China with both caution and strength. Engagement is crucial, but we must also protect our interests and those of our allies. A firm stance against the Chinese Communist Party’s aggressive policies is necessary to ensure global stability.
**Interviewer:** There’s much discussion around former President Trump’s influence and the direction he wants to take the administration. Given your support for him during controversial times, how do you reconcile that with the need for a unified front in national security matters?
**Mike Waltz:** Support for Trump reflects a commitment to an America-first approach. However, national security transcends politics; it is about protecting the American people and our values. If appointed, I would prioritize the interests of the U.S. above all, striving for bipartisan support where possible.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, with your military background and previous political stance, how do you respond to the critics who say that increased militarization in foreign policy may not lead to long-term solutions?
**Mike Waltz:** Critics often overlook the importance of strength in deterrence. History shows us that weakness can invite aggression. However, I agree that we must also incorporate diplomacy and partnerships as essential tools in our strategy. Balance is key.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Congressman Waltz. As readers consider the implications of this potential appointment, how do you think Americans should weigh their perceptions of military intervention against diplomatic efforts in light of your hawkish stance?
—
**Question for Readers:** As discussions surrounding Mike Waltz’s potential appointment as National Security Advisor unfold, do you think the U.S. should favor a more militarized approach to foreign policy, especially regarding tensions with nations like China and the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East? Or do you believe that diplomacy should take precedence in addressing these crises? Your thoughts could shape the direction of our national dialogue.
