The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What are the potential long-term consequences of Nayib Bukele’s re-election for democratic institutions in El Salvador?
**Interview with Political Analyst Maria Rodriguez on Nayib Bukele’s Re-election**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Maria. Following President Nayib Bukele’s recent proclamation of victory in El Salvador’s general elections, with over 85% of the votes, what are your initial thoughts on this overwhelming support?
**Maria Rodriguez:** Thank you for having me. It’s quite remarkable, isn’t it? Bukele’s ability to secure such a high percentage suggests a significant level of support among the electorate, despite the controversial nature of his re-election bid. His administration has leveraged social media effectively, connecting with voters in a way that resonates with younger generations.
**Editor:** Speaking of the controversy around his re-election, Bukele used a legal loophole to run again, despite the constitutional prohibition against consecutive terms. How does this impact the perception of democracy in El Salvador?
**Maria Rodriguez:** This is indeed a critical point. Many political analysts argue that by circumventing constitutional constraints, Bukele is undermining the democratic process. It raises questions about the rule of law and the integrity of electoral institutions. While his supporters may see him as a strong leader, opponents view this as a threat to democratic principles.
**Editor:** Lastly, what do you think the implications are for El Salvador moving forward, especially when considering the stark difference in votes received by Bukele’s New Ideas party and his closest competitors?
**Maria Rodriguez:** The disparity in votes is telling. It suggests that Bukele’s administration may have a strong mandate to continue its policies, but it also means he could face significant pressure to deliver on his promises. However, if his approach to governance disregards dissent or political pluralism, we might see growing divisions in the country. I believe this will spark a debate on the balance between strong leadership and democratic accountability.
**Editor:** To our readers, what do you think about Bukele’s re-election and the implications of his legal maneuvering? Does overwhelming support validate his actions, or does it signal a troubling trend for democracy in El Salvador? We want to hear your thoughts!
