The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might the international community respond to concerns about democratic erosion in El Salvador following Bukele’s victory?
**Interview with Political Analyst, Dr. Maria Gonzalez**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Gonzalez. President Nayib Bukele has just proclaimed a significant re-election victory, claiming over 85% of the votes. What are your initial thoughts on this outcome?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s overwhelming claim to victory is striking, especially considering the context of his re-election. It raises questions about the legitimacy of the electoral process, especially since he circumvented constitutional barriers to run again.
**Editor:** That’s a crucial point. Many Venezuelans are concerned about the rule of law in situations like this. What implications could Bukele’s re-election have for democracy in El Salvador?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** If Bukele continues to undermine constitutional provisions, it could set a dangerous precedent for future governance. His popularity might shield him for now, but it raises serious concerns about the erosion of democratic institutions and norms.
**Editor:** Given the context of more than 1.2 million votes in his favor, how do you think the opposition parties—FMLN and Arena—should respond to such a decisive result?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** The opposition needs to re-evaluate their strategies. They face a monumental challenge in mobilizing support and countering Bukele’s narrative. Engaging in dialogue about constitutional reforms or grassroots movements could be a starting point.
**Editor:** With such a disparity in vote counts, do you believe this situation will fuel political polarization in El Salvador?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** Absolutely. When a leader claims such a dominant victory, it often exacerbates divisions. Supporters may feel emboldened while opponents could feel disillusioned. This polarization can hinder collaborative efforts to address national issues.
**Editor:** That leads us to our question for the readers: How do you feel about Bukele’s re-election and the implications it has for democratic practices in El Salvador? Are you optimistic about the future of democracy in the country, or do you see this as a concerning trend? Let the debate begin!
