The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What are the potential long-term impacts of Nayib Bukele’s reelection on El Salvador’s democratic institutions?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Elena Morales on Nayib Bukele’s Election Victory**
**Interviewer**: Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Morales. President Nayib Bukele has claimed victory in the recent general elections with over 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on the implications of this decisive win for El Salvador?
**Dr. Morales**: Thank you for having me. Bukele’s victory is significant—not just for the numbers, but for what it means for the country’s political landscape. Claiming such a large share of the vote suggests a strong consolidation of power, but it raises questions about the state of democracy in El Salvador, especially given his controversial legal maneuver to run for re-election despite constitutional barriers.
**Interviewer**: Indeed, many are concerned about the legitimacy of the election considering Bukele’s methods. How do you think the public perceives this situation? Are they supportive, or is there growing dissent?
**Dr. Morales**: It’s a mixed bag. His supporters celebrate what they see as a clear endorsement of his policies and leadership. However, there are segments of the population and the opposition that view this as a dangerous precedent for authoritarianism. It opens up an important debate about the balance between governance effectiveness and democratic integrity.
**Interviewer**: Speaking of the opposition, with the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN) and the National Republican Alliance (Arena) trailing far behind, what does this say about the future of these political parties?
**Dr. Morales**: Their struggle to connect with voters raises critical questions about their relevance moving forward. If they cannot adapt and present a viable alternative to Bukele’s approach, we might see a continued polarization in Salvadoran politics. The larger question is whether a two-party system can thrive in an environment like this, or if it will lead to more fragmentation.
**Interviewer**: Lastly, how should the international community approach this situation? What actions would be appropriate in the face of these developments?
**Dr. Morales**: The international community must tread carefully. While it’s crucial to advocate for democratic principles, any intervention should be in solidarity with the Salvadoran people and their voices. Encouraging dialogue among parties and supporting civil society initiatives could be a positive step, but outright condemnation or sanctions could exacerbate tensions.
**Interviewer**: Thank you, Dr. Morales. Your insights really underscore the complexity of this election and its aftermath.
As readers, what do you think about Bukele’s claim to victory? Does overwhelming electoral support justify the means of securing power, or does it undermine democratic principles? Let the debate begin.