The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, declared himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What are the potential consequences of Nayib Bukele’s re-election for democratic principles in El Salvador?
**Interview with Political Analyst**
**Interviewer:** Today, we have political analyst Maria Lopez to discuss the recent electoral developments in El Salvador, where President Nayib Bukele declared himself the winner of the general elections with over 85% of the votes. Thank you for joining us, Maria.
**Maria Lopez:** Thank you for having me.
**Interviewer:** Bukele’s announcement certainly has generated quite a buzz. He claimed victory during a speech to his supporters, but there are significant questions regarding the constitutionality of his candidacy. What are your thoughts on his re-election and the legalities surrounding it?
**Maria Lopez:** It’s a complex situation. While Bukele’s popularity is undeniable—having received over 1.2 million votes—his method of securing the presidency for a second term raises serious constitutional questions. The Constitution prohibits consecutive re-election, and critics argue that his legal maneuvering undermines democratic principles. This situation could set a concerning precedent for political integrity in El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** Indeed, many are concerned about the implications for democracy. The preliminary results show a stark difference between Bukele and his opponents, with the next closest party, FMLN, securing just over 110,000 votes. How should we interpret this gap?
**Maria Lopez:** The significant lead reflects Bukele’s strong support base, which he has cultivated through various social and economic reforms. However, it could also indicate a lack of viable alternatives for the electorate, as the traditional parties have struggled to regain public trust since the civil war. This skewed landscape could lead to complacency in governance if opposition voices are stifled.
**Interviewer:** Some may argue that the landslide victory is a clear mandate from the people. How should we balance the idea of popular support with the principles of a constitutional democracy?
**Maria Lopez:** That’s a vital question. While public support can bolster a leader’s legitimacy, it must exist within the framework of constitutional governance. Voter enthusiasm should not eclipse the rule of law. The dangers of populism are well-documented, and it’s crucial for both leaders and citizens to uphold democratic norms, even when faced with charismatic leadership.
**Interviewer:** As we look to the future, what do you think these elections mean for the stability of El Salvador and its democratic institutions?
**Maria Lopez:** The outcome poses a double-edged sword. If Bukele continues on a path of reform while respecting democratic institutions, it could lead to stability. However, if he consolidates power and sidelines opposition, we might see increased tensions and potential unrest. The role of civil society and the media will be critical in holding the government accountable.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Maria, for sharing your insights. It certainly invites a debate about the balance of power and democratic values in El Salvador.
**Maria Lopez:** Thank you. It’s an essential conversation that will shape the country’s future.
**Interviewer:** To our readers, how do you feel about Bukele’s sweeping victory and the implications of his constitutional maneuvering? Do you believe his methods will strengthen or undermine democracy in El Salvador? Share your thoughts in the comments below!