The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What factors contributed to Nayib Bukele’s overwhelming support in the recent election, and how do they reflect changes in Salvadoran society?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Lopez on Nayib Bukele’s Election Victory**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Lopez. President Nayib Bukele has proclaimed victory in the recent general elections, claiming he received more than 85% of the votes. What do you make of this overwhelming support?
**Dr. Lopez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s claimed victory is indeed remarkable, especially in a country where political sentiments have historically been quite polarized. His ability to secure such a significant margin suggests he has tapped into a deep well of public support, likely driven by his anti-corruption messaging and his initiatives on public safety.
**Interviewer:** However, Bukele’s re-election appears to come under scrutiny due to constitutional concerns regarding his eligibility. He used a legal loophole to run again. What implications does this have for the rule of law in El Salvador?
**Dr. Lopez:** This is a critical point of debate. While he may have technically met the legal requirements, the spirit of the law seems compromised. Bukele’s maneuver raises questions about the integrity of democratic institutions in El Salvador. If citizens begin to believe that the law can be bent for political expediency, it could erode public trust in both the electoral process and governmental institutions.
**Interviewer:** The figures show a massive disparity in votes compared to his closest opponents. How do you interpret the support for Bukele’s party, New Ideas, especially against traditional parties like FMLN and Arena?
**Dr. Lopez:** It’s indicative of a significant shift in voter sentiment. Traditional parties like FMLN and Arena have struggled with a legacy of corruption and ineffectiveness, allowing Bukele’s New Ideas party to present itself as a breath of fresh air. This shift also reflects a generational change in the electorate, with younger voters eager for new solutions.
**Interviewer:** Given these developments, what do you think the future holds for El Salvador? Could Bukele’s continued leadership pose risks to democracy?
**Dr. Lopez:** That’s certainly a possibility. If Bukele pushes through policies that further consolidate power under the executive branch or continues to bypass constitutional norms, it could lead to an increasingly authoritarian governance style. It’s essential for citizens and civil society to remain vigilant and advocate for democratic principles to ensure a balanced system of governance.
**Interviewer:** There seems to be a lot at stake here. What do you think the public should be focusing on moving forward?
**Dr. Lopez:** The public should engage in dialogue about the importance of upholding constitutional law and protecting democratic institutions. It’s crucial to scrutinize Bukele’s actions closely and hold him accountable. This dialogue must happen across different sectors of society to ensure that democracy is not just about elections but also about sustaining a system of governance that respects freedom and rule of law.
**Interviewer:** Thank you for your insights, Dr. Lopez. In light of this discussion, we invite our readers to consider: Do you believe Bukele’s approach is a necessary evolution in El Salvador’s political landscape, or does it set a dangerous precedent for democracy? Share your thoughts.
