The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What implications does President Bukele’s re-election have for the future of democracy in El Salvador?
**Interview with Political Analyst Maria Lopez**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us today, Maria. Following President Nayib Bukele’s recent proclamation of victory in the general elections with over 85% of the votes, what are your thoughts on the implications of such a significant win in a country with a history of contentious political dynamics?
**Maria Lopez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s overwhelming support can indicate a strong endorsement from the electorate for his political agenda. However, it raises questions about the electoral process, especially considering he utilized a legal loophole to run for re-election against the constitutional norm.
**Editor:** That’s a good point. Given this situation, do you believe this sets a precedent for future leaders in El Salvador, or could it lead to potential backlash among the opposition and the public?
**Maria Lopez:** It certainly could set a concerning precedent. If leaders believe they can manipulate legal frameworks to bypass restrictions, we might see more attempts to consolidate power. This could fuel dissent among those who value democratic principles, leading to increased polarization and unrest in the future.
**Editor:** As we reflect on these developments, how do you think the international community will respond to Bukele’s re-election and the methods he employed to secure it?
**Maria Lopez:** The international response will be crucial. Many countries prioritize democratic integrity and may scrutinize Bukele’s tactics. Depending on their reactions, we could see diplomatic consequences or, conversely, support if they view him as a stabilizing force in the region.
**Editor:** Interesting insights, Maria. To our readers, what do you think about Bukele’s re-election under such circumstances? Do you view it as a legitimate victory that reflects the people’s will, or does it concern you that he sidestepped constitutional limitations? Let’s discuss.
