The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might Nayib Bukele’s election victory impact U.S.-El Salvador relations in the coming years?
**Interview with Political Analyst Maria Gonzalez on Nayib Bukele’s Election Victory**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us today, Maria. President Nayib Bukele has proclaimed himself the winner of the recent elections in El Salvador, claiming over 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on his re-election, especially considering the constitutional controversy surrounding his candidacy?
**Maria Gonzalez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s claim to victory indeed raises important questions. His ability to circumvent constitutional restrictions on re-election by using a legal trick has sparked debates not only about his legitimacy as a leader but also about the strength of democratic institutions in El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** Speaking of debates, there seems to be a significant divide in public opinion. Supporters may view his victory positively, while critics express concern about the implications for democracy. How do you think this will shape the political landscape moving forward?
**Maria Gonzalez:** That’s an excellent question. While Bukele’s strong support is evident with over a million votes, the constitutional issues could lead to increased polarization. His supporters might see this as a mandate for his policies, whereas opponents might argue that his actions undermine democracy. This division could either consolidate his power if he continues to deliver on his promises or lead to civil unrest if dissent grows against what many perceive as authoritarian behavior.
**Interviewer:** Given this context, do you believe that the international community will respond differently depending on their stance on Bukele’s governance style?
**Maria Gonzalez:** Absolutely, the international response will vary significantly. Some nations may view him as a reformer and a leader willing to take bold actions for his country, while others might see him as a threat to democracy. Opinions on human rights practices and freedom of the press under his administration will also play a crucial role in shaping international relations.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, what would you say to our readers who might be unsure about how to feel regarding Bukele’s presidency?
**Maria Gonzalez:** I would encourage readers to consider both sides of the debate. Reflect on what Bukele’s leadership means for democratic norms, social justice, and economic development in El Salvador. As we engage in this discussion, let’s not forget that the true essence of democracy lies in our ability to express diverse opinions and critically assess our leaders.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Maria, for your insights. To our readers, how do you view Bukele’s overwhelming electoral victory? Is it a sign of strong leadership or a threat to democracy? We invite you to share your thoughts below.
