The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What are the potential long-term effects of President Bukele’s landslide victory on democratic practices in El Salvador?
**Interview with Political Analyst María Torres**
*Interviewer:* Thank you for joining us today, María. With President Nayib Bukele proclaiming himself the winner of the recent elections, receiving over 85% of the votes, how do you interpret this landslide victory?
*María Torres:* It’s a significant moment for El Salvador, but it raises important questions about democracy and electoral integrity. Bukele’s legal maneuver to run again, despite constitutional barriers, complicates the narrative.
*Interviewer:* Indeed. Many have praised his leadership, while critics argue this sets a concerning precedent for democratic norms. How do you think this victory will impact the political landscape in El Salvador moving forward?
*María Torres:* It solidifies Bukele’s grip on power, but it also intensifies the debate over the future of democracy in the country. The opposition parties, like FMLN and Arena, need to reassess their strategies. If they fail to rally significant support, it could lead to a more polarized environment.
*Interviewer:* Interesting perspective. Given these developments, what do you think the general public’s sentiments are? Are they more supportive of Bukele’s populist approach, or do they have reservations about his methods?
*María Torres:* While many citizens feel he brings a fresh perspective and has initiated progress, there’s a growing concern about governance without checks and balances. It will be crucial for voters to maintain a dialogue about what kind of leadership they want, especially in light of these controversial tactics.
*Interviewer:* Thank you, María. As a takeaway, how do you think citizens should engage in this political climate to ensure their voices are heard?
*María Torres:* It’s vital for citizens to stay informed and participate actively, whether through voting, local activism, or discourse on social media. The future of democracy in El Salvador hinges on a well-informed electorate that holds leaders accountable.
*Interviewer:* The implications of Bukele’s re-election are profound. What do you think readers will take away from this situation regarding their own perceptions of democracy?
*María Torres:* That’s a crucial question—readers might reflect on how easy it can be for leaders to manipulate laws for personal gain. It fosters debate about the importance of constitutional integrity versus popular approval. How far are we willing to go to support a leader whose methods might compromise democratic principles?
*Interviewer:* Thank you, María, for your insights today. This is certainly a topic that will spark debate among our readers.
