The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might Nayib Bukele’s leadership style influence future political developments in Central America?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Gonzalez on Nayib Bukele’s Re-Election**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Gonzalez. President Nayib Bukele has declared victory in the recent elections, claiming over 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on this overwhelming mandate, considering the controversy over his legal maneuvering to seek re-election?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s claim of winning with such a significant majority undoubtedly reflects a level of public support; however, it raises fundamental questions about democracy and the rule of law in El Salvador. His approach to circumventing the constitutional ban on consecutive re-elections can set a concerning precedent for future leaders who might attempt similar tactics.
**Interviewer:** That’s an interesting point. Many supporters praise his leadership and results, particularly in terms of security and economic policies. Do you think these achievements justify the means he used to secure his re-election?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** That’s a complex issue. While many citizens are benefiting from improved security and economic initiatives, we must weigh these achievements against the principles of democratic governance. If a leader can manipulate the rules to serve their interests, it undermines the foundation of democracy. The long-term implications could be detrimental, leading to authoritarianism.
**Interviewer:** Given the results—his party, New Ideas, far outpacing the traditional parties—how do you see the political landscape changing in El Salvador?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** The fragmentation of traditional parties like FMLN and ARENA signals a significant shift. Bukele’s populist appeal has attracted many disillusioned voters. However, this could also lead to polarization and conflict, particularly as opposition parties regroup. The success of New Ideas raises questions about whether this trend will endure or if voters will seek alternatives in future elections.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, with opinions divided, how do you think the international community should respond to Bukele’s re-election and his approach to governance?
**Dr. Gonzalez:** The international community must balance its response. While it is crucial to respect the democratic choices of the Salvadoran people, vigilance is essential in advocating for democratic norms. Engaging with Bukele while also promoting respect for constitutional boundaries and human rights will be crucial to ensure El Salvador does not slide further into authoritarianism.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Gonzalez. To our readers: What do you think about Bukele’s re-election and the implications of his legal strategies? Does the end justify the means? We invite you to share your opinions in the comments below.