The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
What are the potential long-term consequences of Nayib Bukele’s re-election on El Salvador’s democratic institutions?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Torres on Nayib Bukele’s Re-election**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Torres. President Nayib Bukele has proclaimed victory in the recent elections with over 85% of the votes, despite constitutional restrictions on re-election. What are your thoughts on the implications of this move for democracy in El Salvador?
**Dr. Torres:** Thank you for having me. Bukele’s actions raise significant concerns about the state of democracy in El Salvador. While his high approval ratings and populist support are evident, the manner in which he maneuvered around the constitution could undermine democratic norms and set a troubling precedent for future leaders.
**Editor:** In your opinion, how should the Salvadoran electorate respond to a government that bends the rules to maintain power?
**Dr. Torres:** The electorate plays a crucial role in holding leaders accountable. It’s essential for citizens to engage in dialogue about the importance of upholding constitutional limits to power. Historically, when leaders exploit legal loopholes, it can lead to authoritarian governance, which affects not just politics but social justice and human rights as well.
**Editor:** Given the current political climate and high levels of dissatisfaction with traditional parties, could Bukele’s popularity indicate a longing for change regardless of the means?
**Dr. Torres:** Absolutely, and that’s the crux of the debate. While voters may have rallied behind Bukele out of frustration with previous administrations, it’s critical to question whether we want change at any cost or if we should prioritize the integrity of our democratic institutions. This scenario poses a broader question: How far are voters willing to go in sacrificing democratic principles for perceived stability and progress?
**Editor:** Lastly, what should be the next steps for both the government and the opposition in light of these election results?
**Dr. Torres:** Moving forward, it’s vital for the government to consider dialogue with opposition parties and civil society to foster unity and stability. The opposition, on the other hand, must regroup, reassess their strategies, and work towards presenting a credible alternative that resonates with voters without compromising democratic values. This situation should spark a larger conversation about the role of citizens in safeguarding their democracy.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Torres, for your insights. As readers reflect on these developments, how do you think this situation might impact their views on democracy in El Salvador?
**Dr. Torres:** I encourage your readers to think critically about the balance between leadership effectiveness and adherence to democratic principles. It’s a conversation worth having, particularly in a time when global norms around democracy are constantly evolving.