The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How should citizens respond to leaders who prioritize popularity over constitutional adherence in a democratic society?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Rodriguez**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Rodriguez. President Nayib Bukele has declared victory in the recent elections with over 85% of the votes. Given that he used a legal maneuver to run despite constitutional prohibitions, what does this say about the state of democracy in El Salvador?
**Dr. Rodriguez:** It’s quite concerning. Bukele’s actions raise questions about respect for constitutional norms and the health of democratic institutions in El Salvador. While his popularity is undeniable, the way he sidestepped the law suggests a troubling trend where leaders prioritize their political ambitions over democratic principles.
**Interviewer:** Many supporters argue that his leadership has brought about significant improvements. How do you respond to those who believe that his popularity justifies his re-election strategy?
**Dr. Rodriguez:** Popularity should not come at the expense of constitutional integrity. While it’s true that some of his policies may have garnered public support, it sets a dangerous precedent when leaders feel empowered to bend the rules. This could lead to authoritarian tendencies in the long run.
**Interviewer:** As we await the final scrutiny of the election results, what should the citizens of El Salvador consider when grappling with these developments?
**Dr. Rodriguez:** Citizens need to be vigilant and prioritize the health of their democracy. They should ask themselves whether they are comfortable with a leader who circumvents constitutional limitations. Should they support a government that disregards the foundational rules of democratic governance, even if it claims to deliver results?
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Dr. Rodriguez. This certainly prompts important discussions about governance and democracy in our region.
**Debate Prompt for Readers:** With Nayib Bukele’s victory and the controversial means by which he achieved re-election, how do you think this will impact the future of democratic norms in El Salvador? Should the ends justify the means in a democracy, or is adherence to constitutional law paramount, regardless of popularity?
