The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
How might President Bukele’s re-election influence the political engagement of Salvadoran youth in the upcoming years?
**Interview with Political Analyst Dr. Maria Lopez on Nayib Bukele’s Recent Victory in El Salvador**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Lopez. President Nayib Bukele has announced a resounding victory in the recent elections, claiming over 85% of the votes. What are your thoughts on the legitimacy of this election given that Bukele used a legal loophole to run for re-election, despite constitutional restrictions?
**Dr. Lopez:** Thank you for having me. This situation raises significant questions about the health of democracy in El Salvador. While Bukele’s claim of victory is impressive in terms of numbers, the method through which he secured his candidacy undermines the constitutional framework designed to promote fair electoral processes. It challenges the integrity of democratic institutions.
**Editor:** Many of Bukele’s supporters argue that his leadership has brought stability and progress to El Salvador. Do you think this public approval can genuinely justify bypassing constitutional rules?
**Dr. Lopez:** That’s a complex issue. Supporters often prioritize immediate results over constitutional adherence, especially in a post-conflict society like El Salvador. However, a strong democracy should not compromise its rules for the sake of results. It creates a dangerous precedent where leaders could feel empowered to disregard established laws when facing opposition.
**Editor:** The opposition parties seem to be far behind in the vote count. What does this signify about the political landscape in El Salvador moving forward?
**Dr. Lopez:** It indicates a troubling polarization in Salvadoran politics. With the New Ideas party leading by such a margin, we might see further weakening of opposition parties, which raises concerns about pluralism and representation. If dissenting voices are marginalized, it can lead to a less vibrant political dialogue and potential unrest.
**Editor:** how do you believe this situation could impact international perceptions of democracy in El Salvador?
**Dr. Lopez:** The international community is closely watching. Bukele’s methods could either be perceived as authoritarian or as an innovative approach to governance, depending on one’s perspective. This scrutiny may lead to diplomatic repercussions, including sanctions or support, which would significantly impact El Salvador’s international relations moving forward.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Lopez, for shedding light on these critical issues.
**Discussion Question for Readers:** Do you believe that President Bukele’s notable election victory despite constitutional challenges undermines the democratic process in El Salvador, or do you see it as a necessary evolution in leadership?
