The president of El Salvador, Nayib Bukele, proclaimed himself the winner of the general elections held on Sunday “with more than 85% of the votes,” according to what he published on the social network democratic history of the world.
“We have won the presidency of the Republic for the second time with more than 85% of the votes,” Bukele said before hundreds of his followers in his victory speech in the Historic Center of San Salvador.
Bukele, who ran for re-election despite the fact that the Constitution prevents it, used a legal trick to run in an election in which all polls showed him as the favorite.
The preliminary scrutiny of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) of El Salvador had reached 31.49% until midnight this Sunday, with which President Nayib Bukele added 1,295,888 votes.
With these results, which must be ratified in a final scrutiny with the physical records, Bukele would obtain an overwhelming advantage over his opponents.
Behind the New Ideas party (NI), the Farabundo Martí National Liberation Front (FMLN, left) is placed with 110,244 votes and the National Republican Alliance (Arena, right), with 96,700 votes.
#Nayib #Bukele #proclaimed #winner #general #elections #Salvador
– What are the potential risks to democracy in El Salvador following Bukele’s re-election victory and his exploitation of legal loopholes?
**Interview with Political Analyst Carlos Mendoza on Bukele’s Re-election Victory**
**Interviewer:** Carlos, Nayib Bukele has claimed victory in the recent elections, stating he received over 85% of the vote. What are the implications of this overwhelming support for his presidency and his controversial re-election?
**Carlos Mendoza:** Well, it really marks a significant moment in El Salvador’s political landscape. Bukele’s ability to secure such a high percentage of votes reflects his popularity, but it also raises questions about the democratic process in the country. You mentioned the legal loophole he exploited to run again despite constitutional restrictions. This sets a dangerous precedent for governance and rule of law in El Salvador.
**Interviewer:** Absolutely. With the preliminary results showing him far ahead of the opposition, do you think this victory could embolden him to further consolidate power?
**Carlos Mendoza:** It certainly could. A mandate like this might give him the justification to push through more controversial policies or reforms. However, we must consider how opposition parties and civil society will respond. If they view this as an erosion of democracy, we could see increased unrest or resistance.
**Interviewer:** That’s a vital point. Some might argue that such a decisive victory can stabilize the government and address pressing issues like crime and economic challenges. What do you think readers should consider in that context?
**Carlos Mendoza:** It’s a double-edged sword. While a strong mandate can lead to swift action on critical issues, it can also lead to authoritarianism if checks and balances are undermined. Readers should debate whether the ends justify the means in Bukele’s case. Is a strong leader worth compromising democratic norms, or should the integrity of the electoral process be upheld at all costs? This is a discussion that needs to happen, as the long-term implications for El Salvador are significant.
**Interviewer:** Thank you, Carlos. It’s clear that Bukele’s victory is setting the stage for intense discussions about democracy and governance in El Salvador. How do you feel readers can actively engage in this conversation?
**Carlos Mendoza:** I encourage readers to voice their opinions, whether in local forums, social media, or community discussions, and to consider the future of their democracy critically. Engaging with different perspectives is crucial in such a pivotal moment for El Salvador.
