Talking to Trump: A Comedy of Errors
Ah, talking to Trump! It’s like attending an open parliament where you can present your case—but let’s be honest, they’ve already decided the outcome before you even open your mouth. It’s not that you’re being heard; no, that would imply a two-way conversation! More like you’re being graciously tolerated while he’s figuring out how to pivot your points into a 10-minute tirade about how great he is. Remember Thursday’s delightful little tête-à-tête between Sheinbaum and Trump? I might describe it as refreshingly uneventful—no dirty bombs, no theatrics, just two folks trying to dust off a “clean notebook.”
Now, let’s dissect this platform for dialogue they’re trying to construct—one that is apparently going to manage the complexities of their relationship like a toddler managing crayons! Let’s face it; Trump’s playbook is as simple as it is ruthless. He’ll put the heat on trade to garnish a few security perks, much akin to a toddler bargaining with his parents: “If I let you take the last cookie, you let me stay up late.”
Any bets on how long it takes for Sheinbaum to start rolling over on those trade advantages? You’d think they were negotiating the fate of the universe! Meanwhile, Mexico needs to dust off its border and customs control like your grandma dusts off her favorite chair—meticulously and just in time for a guest. If they can impress Trump with their metrics on immigration and fentanyl smuggling, maybe, just maybe, he’ll go easy on them when he breathes down their neck for trade concessions.
But let’s get real here. We’ve got some juicy issues on the table, such as Mexico’s relentless obsession with overcomplicating the energy relationship. Honestly, it’s like watching a soap opera that just won’t end! And then there’s the disappearance act of autonomous bodies and the little legal reforms that even Schrödinger would marvel at. Let’s not forget those under-the-radar Chinese investments either—nothing like a good ol’ squeeze on telecoms and cyberspace to heat things up!
The irony is delicious: Trump thrives on the reality of stability and submission from Mexico while ignoring any semblance of democratic idealism. It’s a bit like trying to serve a five-star meal to someone whose idea of fine dining is a fast food drive-thru!
Ah, the “anti-Mexicanismo” that fueled Trump’s campaign eight years ago—what a gem! You’d think after all this time we’d be working on fixing our image, but no! Instead, we have a Mexico in 2024 that’s the equivalent of grandma’s old car—rusty, full of aches, and a little shaky. What’s more alarming is the level of violence that refuses to play nice despite the façade of progress.
The government’s victory over the judiciary was celebrated like winning a game of Monopoly but loyalty is still with the extortionists and drug traffickers! Oh, the glorious irony: a self-inflicted pyrrhic victory. I’m not saying we should have fireworks for mere survival; I mean, what’s a triumph without a bit of celebration?
No amount of propaganda will enhance our foreign image unless our government learns the magic tricks of efficiency, order, and security. In the words of a poet, what we need are “concrete bridges, big turbines, tractors, silver barns, and good governments.”
So, as we draw the curtains on this political comedy, let’s remember: we can improvise all we want in a farcical play, but until we hit the right notes of governance, we’re stuck on the same old stage, surrounded by the same old problems!
Engaging in conversation with Trump resembles participating in an open parliament; while he may listen to your concerns due to the nature of the dialogue, it is likely that his decisions are already set in stone. Nevertheless, Thursday’s brief 12-minute call between Sheinbaum and Trump presented an opportunity devoid of major controversies, indicating a willingness to start fresh.
It is now imperative to establish a constructive dialogue platform that effectively manages the complexities inherent in U.S.-Mexico relations without overly conflating various channels of communication. Trump’s approach typically revolves around leveraging trade pressures to gain concessions on security and migration issues. Considering his age of 78 and his past accomplishments in dealings with three successive Mexican administrations, it would be unwise for him to alter his established methods.
I anticipate that Sheinbaum will concede areas where he can appease a transactional leader. Our national interest aligns with enhancing border and customs controls, aiming for improved metrics related to immigration and fentanyl smuggling. If the Mexican government succeeds in these areas, Trump may refrain from applying excessive pressure on trade matters, except regarding certain unavoidable issues. Among these are Mexico’s persistent inclination to complicate energy relations, the dismantling of autonomous agencies and alterations posed by the new judicial reforms, and the underreporting of Chinese investments in Mexico, particularly concerning telecommunications and cyberspace. However, it appears that Trump is unconcerned about the Mexican government’s erosion of rights like access to information or the politicization of judicial institutions. His primary expectations revolve around stability from Mexico and compliance with his agendas, which starkly contrasts democratic ideals.
The lingering challenge in the bilateral relationship is that Trump’s election victory eight years ago was significantly fueled by anti-Mexican sentiment, a narrative which intensified as his campaign progressed; nearly 90% of his speeches during the final stretch featured an anti-Mexican tone. This raises pertinent questions about our enduring unfavorable reputation in the United States: Why has this nation not advanced in terms of security, infrastructure, or territorial control over the past eight years? Mexico in 2024 remains a nation riddled with issues—aging infrastructure, rampant violence, and unfulfilled promises of progress. Changing perceptions in the U.S. requires tangible improvements within Mexico itself; without pacification, functional ports, reliable roadways, and an enforcement of the rule of law against extortionists and drug traffickers, reform is unattainable. Currently, the government has only managed to exert authority over the judiciary, a success akin to an older sibling monopolizing a toy belonging to a younger. Such hollow victories do little to inspire national pride or elevate our standing internationally. Effectiveness in governance, security, and infrastructure are crucial for rehabilitating Mexico’s image. As one poet poignantly articulated: “concrete bridges, big turbines, tractors, silver barns, good governments.”
Analyst. @leonardocurzio
Join our channel
EL UNIVERSAL is now on Whatsapp! From your mobile device, find out about the most relevant news of the day, opinion articles, entertainment, trends and more.
**Interview with Political Analyst Leonardo Curzio on U.S.-Mexico Relations and the Recent Trump-Sheinbaum Conversation**
**Interviewer:** Thank you for joining us, Leonardo. Let’s dive into the recent conversation between Claudia Sheinbaum and Donald Trump. Many described the exchange as uneventful. What were your impressions?
**Leonardo Curzio:** Thank you for having me. Yes, the call was a refreshing break from the usual drama we associate with Trump. It felt more like a polite inquiry than a heated negotiation, which is a departure from our expectations. However, while it lacked controversy, it showcases that both parties seem willing to start afresh.
**Interviewer:** You mentioned a “platform for dialogue” that needs to be established. What challenges do you foresee in creating effective communication between the two leaders?
**Leonardo Curzio:** The challenge lies in the complexity of U.S.-Mexico relations. Trump’s negotiating style has often been transactional; he links trade concessions to security and immigration issues like leveraging trade pressures to exact compliance. It’s essential that Sheinbaum finds ways to manage these expectations without losing sight of Mexico’s democratic ideals.
**Interviewer:** Given Trump’s established methods, do you think Sheinbaum will be pressured into making concessions, especially regarding trade?
**Leonardo Curzio:** Absolutely. It would be naive to think otherwise. She’ll likely find herself needing to roll over on some trade advantages just to maintain balance in their relationship. However, it’s crucial for Mexico to present strong metrics on immigration and fentanyl smuggling to lessen Trump’s trade demands. This could create a more conducive environment for dialogue moving forward.
**Interviewer:** You have touched on intriguing points regarding Mexico’s energy relations and judicial reforms. How do you see these issues impacting the overall dialogue with Trump?
**Leonardo Curzio:** Mexico’s energy complexities and recent judicial reforms have certainly drawn scrutiny. Trump is not likely to prioritize issues like the politicization of judicial institutions unless they escalate dramatically. He’s focused more on stability and compliance with his agendas rather than ensuring democratic practices are upheld. These foundations need addressing if any long-term solutions are to be discussed.
**Interviewer:** Lastly, how do you assess the state of safety and governance in Mexico as it relates to the ongoing pressures from Trump?
**Leonardo Curzio:** The situation is precarious. Despite the facade of progress, violence persists, capturing the struggle around governance and public safety. The government’s focus on controlling narratives rather than genuinely addressing these issues will only lead to more instability. Efficient governance and security measures are crucial to improve Mexico’s international image and, consequently, its bargaining power with the U.S.
**Interviewer:** Fascinating insights, Leonardo. Thank you for sharing your perspective on this evolving relationship.
**Leonardo Curzio:** Thank you for having me! It’s a complex but vital topic that deserves ongoing attention.
