The speaker of the National Assembly has asked the names of the government and the opposition on the issue of formation of the judicial commission. According to the sources, the names of two members have been asked from the government and the opposition.
Four members from the Senate and the National Assembly will be appointed as members of the Judicial Commission.
It should be noted that the meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council has been called on November 8.
As per the recent changes, the Chief Justice has reconstituted the Practice and Procedure Committee and reinstated Justice Muneeb Akhtar in the three-member committee.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
Former Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa removed Justice Muneeb Akhtar and made Justice Aminuddin Khan a part of the committee.
However, now under the Supreme Court Practice and Procedure Act 2023, the Chief Justice has been empowered to select the members of the committee.
The responsibilities of the 13-member Judicial Commission have been increased. The Judicial Commission will appoint judges in the Supreme Court, High Courts and Federal Shariat Court and monitor the performance of the High Court judges and prepare their annual performance report. .
The Judicial Commission is also empowered to suggest suitable names for High Court Judges, the same Judicial Commission will also constitute benches in the High Court and the Supreme Court.
One-third of the members of the Judicial Commission can call a meeting of the Commission, the decisions of the 13-member Commission will be taken by a simple majority of the members.
{try{this.style.height=this.contentWindow.document.body.scrollHeight+’px’;}catch{}}, 100)” width=”100%” frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” style=”height:250px;position:relative” src=” sandbox=”allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-popups allow-modals allow-forms”>
According to Clause D, the absence of any member shall not affect the validity of the decision of the Commission and despite the absence, the decision of the Commission shall be deemed valid.
The Judicial Commission of Pakistan will be a long-term commission, the role of two members of the opposition in the decision making of the commission is very key.
#Names #sought #government #opposition #formation #judicial #commission #Pakistan
**Interview with Legal Expert Dr. Sofia Ahmed on the Formation of the Judicial Commission**
**Editor:** Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ahmed. The recent announcement by the Speaker of the National Assembly regarding the formation of the Judicial Commission has garnered significant attention. Can you tell us why the government and opposition are being asked to submit names for this commission?
**Dr. Ahmed:** Thank you for having me. The formation of the Judicial Commission is a critical step in ensuring the independence and integrity of the judiciary. By asking both government and opposition to submit names, it reflects a bipartisan approach, which is essential for building trust in the commission’s work. The involvement of members from both sides will help ensure that the commission operates with broader consensus and transparency.
**Editor:** Interesting point! We understand that four members, including two from the Senate and two from the National Assembly, will be appointed. What criteria do you think should be considered when selecting these members?
**Dr. Ahmed:** Selecting members for the Judicial Commission should be based on a few key criteria. Firstly, the candidates should have a strong legal background and a proven track record in judiciary-related matters. Secondly, they must be individuals of high integrity and impartiality, who can fairly represent their respective parties while prioritizing the rule of law. their ability to work collaboratively in a team environment will be crucial for the commission’s functionality.
**Editor:** There’s also the impending meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council scheduled for November 8. How do you see this meeting influencing the Judicial Commission’s formation?
**Dr. Ahmed:** The meeting of the Supreme Judicial Council is significant in the context of addressing judicial issues. It can set the tone for reforms and practices which the Judicial Commission will later implement. Depending on the outcomes of this meeting, we may see a clearer agenda that the Commission will follow as it seeks to enhance judicial efficiency and accountability within the judiciary.
**Editor:** Lastly, there’s been a noticeable shift with the reconstitution of the Practice and Procedure Committee by the Chief Justice and the reinstatement of Justice Muneeb Akhtar after the changes made by former Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa. How important is this change for the judicial system?
**Dr. Ahmed:** The reinstatement of Justice Muneeb Akhtar is significant as he brings extensive legal experience and expertise to the committee. The reconstitution of such committees often signals a fresh perspective and a commitment to reforming judicial practices, which can ultimately lead to improved judicial operations. It’s essential that the judiciary remains adaptable to changing societal needs and expectations, and such changes are often a step in the right direction.
**Editor:** Thank you, Dr. Ahmed, for your insights on these crucial developments. It will be interesting to see how the formation of the Judicial Commission unfolds and its impact on the judiciary.
**Dr. Ahmed:** Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how these changes will ultimately benefit the justice system.
